Timebomb Game Thread
Moderator: Mafia Mods
-
- not too sweet to sledge
- Posts: 4088
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 2:03 am
- Contact:
Re: Timebomb Day 3
OK, I'm off for IRL stuff. I won't be online the rest of this game day. My vote is on gonzo and I'm very comfortable with that.
Later
Later
Re: Timebomb Day 3
did you miss what he posted yesterday morning when the code letters went up?Uselesstwit wrote:then why did this sense making take until day three to show upoblivion wrote:the set-up of this game kinda plays to his strengths and interests.irretating wrote:Maybe so, but the game I was briefly in at TR with him he didn't seem to actually, you know, play the game.oblivion wrote:this looks a little weak.irretating wrote:I'm getting suspicious of fuzzy, with the insatiable curiosity and the lockstep voting behind oblivion.
He actually got me curious enough to start a spreadsheet.

- Fuzzy Fungi
- Posts: 152
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 2:03 pm
- About me: Pchoo!
- Location: Toronto
- Contact:
Re: Timebomb Day 3
To be fair I'm pretty sure I was wrong yesterday morning.
Re: Timebomb Day 3
true, but it did spark my interest.
damn. deleted a paragraph on second thought.
damn. deleted a paragraph on second thought.
Re: Timebomb Day 3
oblivion, fuzzy's one of those zany people you seem to be a bit maternal about over at TR (don't blame you, I think they're cute as buttons, too), but best not to let it get in the way of your judgement, I think. 
I protected myself to prevent points being added. Unfortunately, if anyone tried to remove points from me they could not, so my tally is unchanged. I could not protect ob two nights in a row, or I would have protected her. Had I known the point addition on night one would be so high, I may well have played this the other way around.
I was in agreement with MZ's idea to put pressure on everyone in our bid to achieve no scum standing at end game and still think it has merit if there's still a vig on our side.
I also follow oblivion's rationale wrt her vote on Feck .. I think I've been with her on the theory since yesterday, if I understood her correctly then. I think we should be aiming to arm Feck today, and render him inactive at night.

I protected myself to prevent points being added. Unfortunately, if anyone tried to remove points from me they could not, so my tally is unchanged. I could not protect ob two nights in a row, or I would have protected her. Had I known the point addition on night one would be so high, I may well have played this the other way around.
I was in agreement with MZ's idea to put pressure on everyone in our bid to achieve no scum standing at end game and still think it has merit if there's still a vig on our side.
I also follow oblivion's rationale wrt her vote on Feck .. I think I've been with her on the theory since yesterday, if I understood her correctly then. I think we should be aiming to arm Feck today, and render him inactive at night.
You seem vehemently opposed to the possibility of us placing scum within arming range, UT.Uselesstwit wrote:actually you know, screw being nice about it, mz's theory is garbage. If we follow it scum will also be able to arm any of us in one night, we don't want that. make them spend two night actions instead of one if they want to arm someone. Let's stick with putting points on likely scum and not do 1/3 of the scums work for them.
no fences
- Magicziggy
- Posts: 4847
- Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:56 am
- Contact:
Re: Timebomb Day 3
irretating wrote:Both praying and aza are MIA. I think zigmen is looking for another sub, I'd guess for aza. Praying was here yesterday but she had the same access troubles as me, and now mantis and UT can't get on ratz.
Good sleuthing MZ, it does fit that authorized is a code word. If that's feck, what does it mean? Feck, need to hear from you.
Anybody else find these two remarks weird coming from the same person.irretating wrote:I thought you were referring to me, ob. That you haven't commented on me yet tells me volumes.
MZ and diva, I just don't get your posts. What are you both on about? MZ, you are going to vote for anyone without votes on them, is that right? How does that strategy help town? This sounds like the vote spreading scheme that I don't agree with. And why did you reveal feck as possibly being the owner of Authorized? That's not pro-town, so FoS you for that. Diva, can you cut back on the drama in your posts, and either FoS or vote for your suspect rather than dance around it? What is it about UT that has you doubting? He didn't come under fire yesterday.
vote gonzo because he's not yet armed and I think he should be
unvote; vote irre
Re: Timebomb Day 3
I didn't notice them ... good pick up. That certainly puts irre on the scum list in my mind.Magicziggy wrote:irretating wrote:Both praying and aza are MIA. I think zigmen is looking for another sub, I'd guess for aza. Praying was here yesterday but she had the same access troubles as me, and now mantis and UT can't get on ratz.
Good sleuthing MZ, it does fit that authorized is a code word. If that's feck, what does it mean? Feck, need to hear from you.Anybody else find these two remarks weird coming from the same person.irretating wrote:I thought you were referring to me, ob. That you haven't commented on me yet tells me volumes.
MZ and diva, I just don't get your posts. What are you both on about? MZ, you are going to vote for anyone without votes on them, is that right? How does that strategy help town? This sounds like the vote spreading scheme that I don't agree with. And why did you reveal feck as possibly being the owner of Authorized? That's not pro-town, so FoS you for that. Diva, can you cut back on the drama in your posts, and either FoS or vote for your suspect rather than dance around it? What is it about UT that has you doubting? He didn't come under fire yesterday.
vote gonzo because he's not yet armed and I think he should be
unvote; vote irre
no fences
Re: Timebomb Day 3
Charlou, you have cleared something up for me. If I wasn't sure before, I am positive now that you are town. Charlou's story clicks with my understanding of stuff that went on last night.charlou wrote:oblivion, fuzzy's one of those zany people you seem to be a bit maternal about over at TR (don't blame you, I think they're cute as buttons, too), but best not to let it get in the way of your judgement, I think.
I protected myself to prevent points being added. Unfortunately, if anyone tried to remove points from me they could not, so my tally is unchanged. I could not protect ob two nights in a row, or I would have protected her. Had I known the point addition on night one would be so high, I may well have played this the other way around.
I was in agreement with MZ's idea to put pressure on everyone in our bid to achieve no scum standing at end game and still think it has merit if there's still a vig on our side.
I also follow oblivion's rationale wrt her vote on Feck .. I think I've been with her on the theory since yesterday, if I understood her correctly then. I think we should be aiming to arm Feck today, and render him inactive at night.
You seem vehemently opposed to the possibility of us placing scum within arming range, UT.Uselesstwit wrote:actually you know, screw being nice about it, mz's theory is garbage. If we follow it scum will also be able to arm any of us in one night, we don't want that. make them spend two night actions instead of one if they want to arm someone. Let's stick with putting points on likely scum and not do 1/3 of the scums work for them.
vote feck
"I wanna exit how I entered: Between two legs."
The Hilltop Hoods.
The Hilltop Hoods.
- Magicziggy
- Posts: 4847
- Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:56 am
- Contact:
Re: Timebomb Day 3
I think gonzo is town. I think Irre is nailing him to the wall.
My ploy on picking on the scummiest player may have back fired but I had my reasons.
I can't reveal them now.
My ploy on picking on the scummiest player may have back fired but I had my reasons.
I can't reveal them now.
Re: Timebomb Day 3
oblivion wrote:I was targeted again, and I'm now armed. I don't think it's to town's benefit for scum to know exactly how many points I received last night. It was less than 4 and more than zero.Fuzzy Fungi wrote:I don't know who is or is not scummy, but I do know that I really want to know what happened last night.
I don't get this, you told them you are armed (provided that is true) so what else do they need to know, you are dead come end game one less townie, provided you are town. I can see keeping a secret if you are armed or not but once that cat is out of the bag then what is left?
Re: Timebomb Day 3
OMG praying posted!! 

- Magicziggy
- Posts: 4847
- Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:56 am
- Contact:
Re: Timebomb Day 3
There's one thing for sure. They'll be no bussing. So if Irre is scum, gonzo is town.
Re: Timebomb Day 3
Uselesstwit wrote:actually you know, screw being nice about it, mz's theory is garbage. If we follow it scum will also be able to arm any of us in one night, we don't want that. make them spend two night actions instead of one if they want to arm someone. Let's stick with putting points on likely scum and not do 1/3 of the scums work for them.

Re: Timebomb Day 3
Fuzzy Fungi wrote:irretating, who are you at TR?
pain in the ass?

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests