Timebomb Game Thread

Mafia Forum is visible to guests. Please note that game threads are limited to posts by players who are involved in each game. Non-player or derail posts will be moved to a gallery thread.

Moderator: Mafia Mods

Post Reply
irretating
not too sweet to sledge
Posts: 4088
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 2:03 am
Contact:

Re: Timebomb Day 3

Post by irretating » Fri Apr 08, 2011 1:40 am

OK, I'm off for IRL stuff. I won't be online the rest of this game day. My vote is on gonzo and I'm very comfortable with that.

Later

oblivion
Noble Savage
Posts: 5860
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 6:41 pm
Contact:

Re: Timebomb Day 3

Post by oblivion » Fri Apr 08, 2011 1:52 am

Uselesstwit wrote:
oblivion wrote:
irretating wrote:
oblivion wrote:
irretating wrote:I'm getting suspicious of fuzzy, with the insatiable curiosity and the lockstep voting behind oblivion.
this looks a little weak.
Maybe so, but the game I was briefly in at TR with him he didn't seem to actually, you know, play the game.
the set-up of this game kinda plays to his strengths and interests.
then why did this sense making take until day three to show up
did you miss what he posted yesterday morning when the code letters went up?

He actually got me curious enough to start a spreadsheet. :ab:

User avatar
Fuzzy Fungi
Posts: 152
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 2:03 pm
About me: Pchoo!
Location: Toronto
Contact:

Re: Timebomb Day 3

Post by Fuzzy Fungi » Fri Apr 08, 2011 1:54 am

To be fair I'm pretty sure I was wrong yesterday morning.

oblivion
Noble Savage
Posts: 5860
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 6:41 pm
Contact:

Re: Timebomb Day 3

Post by oblivion » Fri Apr 08, 2011 2:09 am

true, but it did spark my interest.

damn. deleted a paragraph on second thought.

User avatar
charlou
arseist
Posts: 32530
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am

Re: Timebomb Day 3

Post by charlou » Fri Apr 08, 2011 2:24 am

oblivion, fuzzy's one of those zany people you seem to be a bit maternal about over at TR (don't blame you, I think they're cute as buttons, too), but best not to let it get in the way of your judgement, I think. ;)


I protected myself to prevent points being added. Unfortunately, if anyone tried to remove points from me they could not, so my tally is unchanged. I could not protect ob two nights in a row, or I would have protected her. Had I known the point addition on night one would be so high, I may well have played this the other way around.

I was in agreement with MZ's idea to put pressure on everyone in our bid to achieve no scum standing at end game and still think it has merit if there's still a vig on our side.

I also follow oblivion's rationale wrt her vote on Feck .. I think I've been with her on the theory since yesterday, if I understood her correctly then. I think we should be aiming to arm Feck today, and render him inactive at night.
Uselesstwit wrote:actually you know, screw being nice about it, mz's theory is garbage. If we follow it scum will also be able to arm any of us in one night, we don't want that. make them spend two night actions instead of one if they want to arm someone. Let's stick with putting points on likely scum and not do 1/3 of the scums work for them.
You seem vehemently opposed to the possibility of us placing scum within arming range, UT.
no fences

User avatar
Magicziggy
Posts: 4847
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:56 am
Contact:

Re: Timebomb Day 3

Post by Magicziggy » Fri Apr 08, 2011 2:27 am

irretating wrote:Both praying and aza are MIA. I think zigmen is looking for another sub, I'd guess for aza. Praying was here yesterday but she had the same access troubles as me, and now mantis and UT can't get on ratz.

Good sleuthing MZ, it does fit that authorized is a code word. If that's feck, what does it mean? Feck, need to hear from you.
irretating wrote:I thought you were referring to me, ob. That you haven't commented on me yet tells me volumes.

MZ and diva, I just don't get your posts. What are you both on about? MZ, you are going to vote for anyone without votes on them, is that right? How does that strategy help town? This sounds like the vote spreading scheme that I don't agree with. And why did you reveal feck as possibly being the owner of Authorized? That's not pro-town, so FoS you for that. Diva, can you cut back on the drama in your posts, and either FoS or vote for your suspect rather than dance around it? What is it about UT that has you doubting? He didn't come under fire yesterday.

vote gonzo because he's not yet armed and I think he should be
Anybody else find these two remarks weird coming from the same person.

unvote; vote irre

User avatar
charlou
arseist
Posts: 32530
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am

Re: Timebomb Day 3

Post by charlou » Fri Apr 08, 2011 2:32 am

Magicziggy wrote:
irretating wrote:Both praying and aza are MIA. I think zigmen is looking for another sub, I'd guess for aza. Praying was here yesterday but she had the same access troubles as me, and now mantis and UT can't get on ratz.

Good sleuthing MZ, it does fit that authorized is a code word. If that's feck, what does it mean? Feck, need to hear from you.
irretating wrote:I thought you were referring to me, ob. That you haven't commented on me yet tells me volumes.

MZ and diva, I just don't get your posts. What are you both on about? MZ, you are going to vote for anyone without votes on them, is that right? How does that strategy help town? This sounds like the vote spreading scheme that I don't agree with. And why did you reveal feck as possibly being the owner of Authorized? That's not pro-town, so FoS you for that. Diva, can you cut back on the drama in your posts, and either FoS or vote for your suspect rather than dance around it? What is it about UT that has you doubting? He didn't come under fire yesterday.

vote gonzo because he's not yet armed and I think he should be
Anybody else find these two remarks weird coming from the same person.

unvote; vote irre
I didn't notice them ... good pick up. That certainly puts irre on the scum list in my mind.
no fences

User avatar
Bolero
Posts: 371
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 2:18 am
About me: Free
Contact:

Re: Timebomb Day 3

Post by Bolero » Fri Apr 08, 2011 2:33 am

charlou wrote:oblivion, fuzzy's one of those zany people you seem to be a bit maternal about over at TR (don't blame you, I think they're cute as buttons, too), but best not to let it get in the way of your judgement, I think. ;)


I protected myself to prevent points being added. Unfortunately, if anyone tried to remove points from me they could not, so my tally is unchanged. I could not protect ob two nights in a row, or I would have protected her. Had I known the point addition on night one would be so high, I may well have played this the other way around.

I was in agreement with MZ's idea to put pressure on everyone in our bid to achieve no scum standing at end game and still think it has merit if there's still a vig on our side.

I also follow oblivion's rationale wrt her vote on Feck .. I think I've been with her on the theory since yesterday, if I understood her correctly then. I think we should be aiming to arm Feck today, and render him inactive at night.
Uselesstwit wrote:actually you know, screw being nice about it, mz's theory is garbage. If we follow it scum will also be able to arm any of us in one night, we don't want that. make them spend two night actions instead of one if they want to arm someone. Let's stick with putting points on likely scum and not do 1/3 of the scums work for them.
You seem vehemently opposed to the possibility of us placing scum within arming range, UT.
Charlou, you have cleared something up for me. If I wasn't sure before, I am positive now that you are town. Charlou's story clicks with my understanding of stuff that went on last night.

vote feck
"I wanna exit how I entered: Between two legs."
The Hilltop Hoods.

User avatar
charlou
arseist
Posts: 32530
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am

Re: Timebomb Day 3

Post by charlou » Fri Apr 08, 2011 2:35 am

MZ, what do you think about Gonzo?
no fences

User avatar
Magicziggy
Posts: 4847
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:56 am
Contact:

Re: Timebomb Day 3

Post by Magicziggy » Fri Apr 08, 2011 2:37 am

I think gonzo is town. I think Irre is nailing him to the wall.
My ploy on picking on the scummiest player may have back fired but I had my reasons.
I can't reveal them now.

praying
Posts: 238
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 2:45 am
Contact:

Re: Timebomb Day 3

Post by praying » Fri Apr 08, 2011 2:40 am

oblivion wrote:
Fuzzy Fungi wrote:I don't know who is or is not scummy, but I do know that I really want to know what happened last night.
I was targeted again, and I'm now armed. I don't think it's to town's benefit for scum to know exactly how many points I received last night. It was less than 4 and more than zero.

I don't get this, you told them you are armed (provided that is true) so what else do they need to know, you are dead come end game one less townie, provided you are town. I can see keeping a secret if you are armed or not but once that cat is out of the bag then what is left?

praying
Posts: 238
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 2:45 am
Contact:

Re: Timebomb Day 3

Post by praying » Fri Apr 08, 2011 2:41 am

OMG praying posted!! :shock:

User avatar
Magicziggy
Posts: 4847
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:56 am
Contact:

Re: Timebomb Day 3

Post by Magicziggy » Fri Apr 08, 2011 2:42 am

There's one thing for sure. They'll be no bussing. So if Irre is scum, gonzo is town.

praying
Posts: 238
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 2:45 am
Contact:

Re: Timebomb Day 3

Post by praying » Fri Apr 08, 2011 2:44 am

Uselesstwit wrote:actually you know, screw being nice about it, mz's theory is garbage. If we follow it scum will also be able to arm any of us in one night, we don't want that. make them spend two night actions instead of one if they want to arm someone. Let's stick with putting points on likely scum and not do 1/3 of the scums work for them.
:cheers:

praying
Posts: 238
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 2:45 am
Contact:

Re: Timebomb Day 3

Post by praying » Fri Apr 08, 2011 2:46 am

Fuzzy Fungi wrote:irretating, who are you at TR?

pain in the ass? :ab:

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests