Zigmen wrote:4) Diva. Playing the noob card one post, then demonstrating advanced knowledge in the next post. I almost but her excuse about the different names for specials, but I can't trust her based on the spirit of her feigned innocence. In answer to her question, yes, I've played maybe 3-4 games at Ratskep as Zigmen. Not my cup of tea. The unwritten "rule" about no-lynch day 1s bit me on the ass, and it's a dumb rule to let Scum strike first.
Oh good grief. I have explained this several times. I will repost it in case you missed the giant sized letters in the last explanation.
I was asking whether or not a "seer" was the same as an investigator, because in the games that I played the "investigator role" came in the form of a prize of a one-night investigation to whomever it was awarded to. With the term "seer", I surmised that it was an assigned role, but I wanted to make sure and I would also like to know all of their capabilities. I had no idea that asking a question meant that you were scum...the logic of this still escapes me.
I was just hoping that it could be a prize that I might win, so that I could at least do something interesting in the game instead of pathetically wandering around in a state of semi-confusion, because I am unfamiliar with other players' style and everybody else is. I know to pay attention to the players who sit on the sidelines, definite scum tell and to watch for inconsistencies in stories. I also don't buy into every clue that is presented, as I got nailed with a lynch in a game because Irre provided a false clue and UT followed up with a factual one (I think) and there was only person whom it could have been; me.
Anyway, my FOS is pointed in Don't Panic's direction, as I am not buying the "too busy" gambit; I have seen it played so many times before. Especially since I have caught him reading the thread without contributing a couple of times.
But we have what appears to be a confirmed scum. I don't understand why the scum didn't take out MZ or Irre (although now I understand why) since he is so far is the sharpest player and is showing the most initiative as well as doing his research. I don't think I am flagging him by saying this, it should be pretty obvious to everyone.
So Higgz assassination makes no sense to me. i can only deduce it has something to do with previous games unless there was a potential there that I did not see.
Just my two cents at this point, not that anybody will read it, I am sure I will have to repeat it later. I
am going to go back and read through day one and day two now that I am a little bit more familiar with people's posting styles. It seems like we are still missing some posters participation.
Currently suffers from Cassandra's curse.