Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

A forum to talk about other sites and things you've found in the jungle that is the internet.

Please take a moment to read the rationalia guidelines: http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3449
Locked
User avatar
Gawd
Posts: 2140
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 7:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by Gawd » Wed Oct 27, 2010 11:18 am

Ilovelucy wrote:
devogue wrote:
Ilovelucy wrote:Banned from Ratskep for a cool off period. Think I'll respect that seeing as I'm actually quite calm. Very clever actually, seeing as it allows others to cool off and not be incited by actions such as mine.
Why is anger forbidden? :dono:
Probably was more to do with calling Timonen a lying cunt and adding that the best part of him trickled down his mother's leg.
And you didn't get perma-banned for that? I got perma-banned for much less and I've never called anyone things like that. I guess the Thought Police at RatSkep have different standards depending on who you are....

User avatar
Ilovelucy
Posts: 203
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:31 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by Ilovelucy » Wed Oct 27, 2010 11:26 am

Gawd wrote:
Ilovelucy wrote:
devogue wrote:
Ilovelucy wrote:Banned from Ratskep for a cool off period. Think I'll respect that seeing as I'm actually quite calm. Very clever actually, seeing as it allows others to cool off and not be incited by actions such as mine.
Why is anger forbidden? :dono:
Probably was more to do with calling Timonen a lying cunt and adding that the best part of him trickled down his mother's leg.
And you didn't get perma-banned for that? I got perma-banned for much less and I've never called anyone things like that. I guess the Thought Police at RatSkep have different standards depending on who you are....
I think the mods were very reluctant to ban me, I worked with a few of them back on RDF and I think there's still a bit of respect for the forum admin. Also, if it had been aimed at anyone else other than Timonen, it may indeed have received a sterner punishment, which kind of confirms the point I'm making. The fact that Timonen is not a normal member and should be treated differently is already implicitly accepted while being explicitly denied. That's the problem with those who are too wrapped up in the idea of rationalism, they are often blind to the implicit elements of human experience.
Forums are interesting and if you don't agree, you can fuck off.

User avatar
Xamonas Chegwé
Bouncer
Bouncer
Posts: 50939
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:23 pm
About me: I have prehensile eyebrows.
I speak 9 languages fluently, one of which other people can also speak.
When backed into a corner, I fit perfectly - having a right-angled arse.
Location: Nottingham UK
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by Xamonas Chegwé » Wed Oct 27, 2010 12:08 pm

Ilovelucy wrote:
devogue wrote:
Ilovelucy wrote:Banned from Ratskep for a cool off period. Think I'll respect that seeing as I'm actually quite calm. Very clever actually, seeing as it allows others to cool off and not be incited by actions such as mine.
Why is anger forbidden? :dono:
Probably was more to do with calling Timonen a lying cunt and adding that the best part of him trickled down his mother's leg.
Maybe. It's a really good job you didn't say that here. We wouldn't stand for anything like that. :biggrin:
A book is a version of the world. If you do not like it, ignore it; or offer your own version in return.
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing :nono:
Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by Hermit » Wed Oct 27, 2010 12:32 pm

Bella Fortuna wrote:...as unique as it gets...
95% unique? ;)


My opinion, as expressed a couple of days ago at RDF MarkII.
Seraph wrote:
riddlemethis wrote:
Seraph wrote:Looking at the document filed by the lawyer acting on behalf of the plaintiffs, a couple of points make me fear that RDFSR and Dawkins will not find this court case as easy to win as it should be. The first two items read "Breach of oral contract" and "Breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing".

The old saying that a verbal contract is not worth the paper it is written on is an exaggeration, but there is a kernel of truth in it.
What I wonder though Seraph is whether by acceptance of contracting fees JT has not explicity accepted/formalised the contract. I'm no legal expert, but coupled with the statements mentioned in the document as being caused by JT referencing the allocation of funds, this stands to reason I think. Given the burden of proof in a civil action, they might well have legs.
One big problem (this relates to the second point) is Timonen's ownership of the company that did a lot of the work in relation to the foundation's online retail outlet. He is alleged to have ripped off 92% of the profit. Timonen will undoubtedly argue that the withdrawals of moneys that he made are justifiable, notwithstanding the fact that those moneys were in addition to the fees and salaries he and his partner were getting. That, and the lack of a written contract will make it difficult to ascertain from a legal point of view, just how much - if any of those amounts - were excessive to the point of fraudulence. Terms of oral contracts are notorious for being disputed and so are implied covenants. The result will depend on the skill of the lawyers and on what kind of judge will finish up adjudicating the case even more so than if contracts and agreements were formally documented.
The only thing that has changed in the meantime is that I am now even less optimistic of Timonen being found guilty. Do you want me to tell you what I think of his behaviour from a moral point of view? Didn't think so.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41035
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by Svartalf » Wed Oct 27, 2010 12:37 pm

Xamonas Chegwé wrote:
Ilovelucy wrote:
devogue wrote:
Ilovelucy wrote:Banned from Ratskep for a cool off period. Think I'll respect that seeing as I'm actually quite calm. Very clever actually, seeing as it allows others to cool off and not be incited by actions such as mine.
Why is anger forbidden? :dono:
Probably was more to do with calling Timonen a lying cunt and adding that the best part of him trickled down his mother's leg.
Maybe. It's a really good job you didn't say that here. We wouldn't stand for anything like that. :biggrin:
no, most of us would be rolling on the floor, laughing their ass off
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
Bella Fortuna
Sister Golden Hair
Posts: 79685
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require.
Location: Scotlifornia
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by Bella Fortuna » Wed Oct 27, 2010 12:43 pm

Svartalf wrote:
Xamonas Chegwé wrote:
Ilovelucy wrote:
devogue wrote:
Ilovelucy wrote:Banned from Ratskep for a cool off period. Think I'll respect that seeing as I'm actually quite calm. Very clever actually, seeing as it allows others to cool off and not be incited by actions such as mine.
Why is anger forbidden? :dono:
Probably was more to do with calling Timonen a lying cunt and adding that the best part of him trickled down his mother's leg.
Maybe. It's a really good job you didn't say that here. We wouldn't stand for anything like that. :biggrin:
no, most of us would be rolling on the floor, laughing their ass off
And we would certainly never go around repeating such things... :coffee:
Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Image
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/

User avatar
Blondie
Forum Desperado
Posts: 1196
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 3:26 pm
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by Blondie » Wed Oct 27, 2010 1:31 pm

Ilovelucy wrote:Banned from Ratskep for a cool off period. Think I'll respect that seeing as I'm actually quite calm. Very clever actually, seeing as it allows others to cool off and not be incited by actions such as mine.
A 2 day suspension to "cool off"? I know that isn't in the FUA.

Are they just making shit up as they go along? It must be something in the "context". :twitch:
In this world there's two kinds of people: Those with loaded guns and those who dig. You dig.

When you have to shoot, shoot, don't talk.

Happy Trails. :)

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by Hermit » Wed Oct 27, 2010 2:06 pm

Disappointingly, Richard Dawkins' page in the encyclopedia dramatica has not been updated yet.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

User avatar
Bella Fortuna
Sister Golden Hair
Posts: 79685
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require.
Location: Scotlifornia
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by Bella Fortuna » Wed Oct 27, 2010 7:37 pm

Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Image
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Wed Oct 27, 2010 7:39 pm

Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

devogue

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by devogue » Wed Oct 27, 2010 7:43 pm

She looks much nicer there (in a Borg cube kind of way).

User avatar
Bella Fortuna
Sister Golden Hair
Posts: 79685
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require.
Location: Scotlifornia
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by Bella Fortuna » Wed Oct 27, 2010 7:47 pm

He's talking about how he opens the safe to take the money... :funny:
Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Image
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/

User avatar
klr
(%gibber(who=klr, what=Leprageek);)
Posts: 32964
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 1:25 pm
About me: The money was just resting in my account.
Location: Airstrip Two
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by klr » Wed Oct 27, 2010 7:48 pm

"This is how much profit we make ..." :demon:
God has no place within these walls, just like facts have no place within organized religion. - Superintendent Chalmers

It's not up to us to choose which laws we want to obey. If it were, I'd kill everyone who looked at me cock-eyed! - Rex Banner

The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression. - Gary Larson

:mob: :comp: :mob:

User avatar
Bella Fortuna
Sister Golden Hair
Posts: 79685
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require.
Location: Scotlifornia
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by Bella Fortuna » Wed Oct 27, 2010 7:51 pm

"Yeah.... I'm really the brains of the operation... you know, Dawkins is really hung like this."
Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Image
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/

User avatar
Feck
.
.
Posts: 28391
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by Feck » Wed Oct 27, 2010 7:57 pm

He looks like Dave Grohl ... and you know how Dave Grohl is in every video ever made ... holy shit I think I'm going have to start listening to dance music :ani:
:hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog:
Give me the wine , I don't need the bread

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests