As for chilling out

Gee, were they allowed to say that over there? I thought the staff had everybody on post approval during this "crisis"?Thinking Aloud wrote:Oh - we all need to chill out, by the way:Trigger Warning!!!1! :
...oh yeah, that thing I stopped giving a shit about years ago.I saw that too and![]()
![]()
![]()
Allegedly. It was apparently a verbal contract, which could mean anything. It could mean something as simple as a misunderstanding. Frankly I don't give a flying fuck. I stopped caring years ago.but he didn't own the fucking wares, and had no permission to take a percentage of profits in addition to his already quite generous salary.
Ok, if UBP is not solely dedicated to RDFRS, and depending on the answer to how the inventory was obtained, then UBP should be able to show a simple accounting of:Bella Fortuna wrote:UPG is/was a company for hire - not solely dedicated to RDFRS productions.
Good questions about the inventory... it'll be interesting to see how things were organised.
The Mad Hatter wrote:Video? What Video?
Rum wrote:Does it occur to you that you have subscribed to the model of maleness you seem to be pushing in order to justify your innately hostile and aggressive nature? I have noticed it often and even wondered if it might be some sort of personality disorder. You should consider this possibility.
Things Rum has diagnosed me with to date: "personality disorder", autism, Aspergers.Rum wrote:Did I leave out being a twat? (With ref to your sig)
eRvin wrote:People can see what a fucking freak you are. Have you not noticed all the disparaging comments you get?
rum wrote:What a cunt you are. Truly.
Rum wrote:Does it occur to you that you have subscribed to the model of maleness you seem to be pushing in order to justify your innately hostile and aggressive nature? I have noticed it often and even wondered if it might be some sort of personality disorder. You should consider this possibility.
Things Rum has diagnosed me with to date: "personality disorder", autism, Aspergers.Rum wrote:Did I leave out being a twat? (With ref to your sig)
eRvin wrote:People can see what a fucking freak you are. Have you not noticed all the disparaging comments you get?
rum wrote:What a cunt you are. Truly.
wow, WTH?Thinking Aloud wrote:Oh - we all need to chill out, by the way:Trigger Warning!!!1! :
Ha ha!Thinking Aloud wrote:Might as well have a little dig while we're talking about the same thing...[/spoiler]Someone on [url=http://www.rationalskepticism.org/news-politics/dawkins-sues-josh-timonen-t14455-1440.html#p537138]RatSkep[/url] wrote:I do not share the Dawkins hate that some here seem to have, although it's nothing compared to Ratz... Jesus, I was just there and I'm remembering where all the "OMG they killed 'Off Topic' " people went. Now that was a hysterical overreaction if ever I saw one. Some of those people need to chill the fuck out and get a sense of proportion.
But what about high-quality, rationally skeptical posts?devogue wrote:Ha ha!Thinking Aloud wrote:Might as well have a little dig while we're talking about the same thing...[/spoiler]Someone on [url=http://www.rationalskepticism.org/news-politics/dawkins-sues-josh-timonen-t14455-1440.html#p537138]RatSkep[/url] wrote:I do not share the Dawkins hate that some here seem to have, although it's nothing compared to Ratz... Jesus, I was just there and I'm remembering where all the "OMG they killed 'Off Topic' " people went. Now that was a hysterical overreaction if ever I saw one. Some of those people need to chill the fuck out and get a sense of proportion.
487 posts about Josh drama on Ratz.
1720 posts about Josh drama on Ratskep.
No such thing in drama. It has to burn hot.Gawdzilla wrote:But what about high-quality, rationally skeptical posts?devogue wrote:Ha ha!Thinking Aloud wrote:Might as well have a little dig while we're talking about the same thing...[/spoiler]Someone on [url=http://www.rationalskepticism.org/news-politics/dawkins-sues-josh-timonen-t14455-1440.html#p537138]RatSkep[/url] wrote:I do not share the Dawkins hate that some here seem to have, although it's nothing compared to Ratz... Jesus, I was just there and I'm remembering where all the "OMG they killed 'Off Topic' " people went. Now that was a hysterical overreaction if ever I saw one. Some of those people need to chill the fuck out and get a sense of proportion.
487 posts about Josh drama on Ratz.
1720 posts about Josh drama on Ratskep.
Shouldn't be allow at RDF jr.devogue wrote:No such thing in drama. It has to burn hot.
Pots and kettles, eh?devogue wrote:Ha ha!Thinking Aloud wrote:Might as well have a little dig while we're talking about the same thing...[/spoiler]Someone on [url=http://www.rationalskepticism.org/news-politics/dawkins-sues-josh-timonen-t14455-1440.html#p537138]RatSkep[/url] wrote:I do not share the Dawkins hate that some here seem to have, although it's nothing compared to Ratz... Jesus, I was just there and I'm remembering where all the "OMG they killed 'Off Topic' " people went. Now that was a hysterical overreaction if ever I saw one. Some of those people need to chill the fuck out and get a sense of proportion.
487 posts about Josh drama on Ratz.
1720 posts about Josh drama on Ratskep.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests