Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

A forum to talk about other sites and things you've found in the jungle that is the internet.

Please take a moment to read the rationalia guidelines: http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3449
Locked
User avatar
Feck
.
.
Posts: 28391
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by Feck » Tue Oct 26, 2010 4:12 pm

So he honestly thought that it was appropriate for him to be taking 92% of the proceeds from a charity shop on top of the money he was already being paid ? and thought that it was fine to report that the shop was just ticking over to Richard ? Is it moral to market yourself under the umbrella and on the website of a charity and then claim you are a For Profits company separate from that charity even though your website says shop proceeds support the charity ? There are even options to Donate to the foundation on the shop web page furthering the impression .They are all on some very shaky legal ground and morally everyone involved in this should be ashamed of either their deliberate duplicity or criminal mismanagement of charity funds .

As for chilling out :pawiz:
:hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog:
Give me the wine , I don't need the bread

User avatar
Bella Fortuna
Sister Golden Hair
Posts: 79685
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require.
Location: Scotlifornia
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by Bella Fortuna » Tue Oct 26, 2010 4:13 pm

UPG is/was a company for hire - not solely dedicated to RDFRS productions.

Good questions about the inventory... it'll be interesting to see how things were organised.
Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Image
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Tue Oct 26, 2010 4:20 pm

Thinking Aloud wrote:Oh - we all need to chill out, by the way:
Trigger Warning!!!1! :
Someone on [url=http://www.rationalskepticism.org/news-politics/dawkins-sues-josh-timonen-t14455-1440.html#p537138]RatSkep[/url] wrote:I do not share the Dawkins hate that some here seem to have, although it's nothing compared to Ratz... Jesus, I was just there and I'm remembering where all the "OMG they killed 'Off Topic' " people went. Now that was a hysterical overreaction if ever I saw one. Some of those people need to chill the fuck out and get a sense of proportion.
Might as well have a little dig while we're talking about the same thing...
Gee, were they allowed to say that over there? I thought the staff had everybody on post approval during this "crisis"?
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

Trolldor
Gargling with Nails
Posts: 15878
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 5:57 am
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by Trolldor » Tue Oct 26, 2010 4:26 pm

I saw that too and :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
...oh yeah, that thing I stopped giving a shit about years ago.
*shrug* we all have to move on at some point Jack, just let it go.
but he didn't own the fucking wares, and had no permission to take a percentage of profits in addition to his already quite generous salary.
Allegedly. It was apparently a verbal contract, which could mean anything. It could mean something as simple as a misunderstanding. Frankly I don't give a flying fuck. I stopped caring years ago.
"The fact is that far more crime and child abuse has been committed by zealots in the name of God, Jesus and Mohammed than has ever been committed in the name of Satan. Many people don't like that statement but few can argue with it."

NamelessFaceless
Posts: 20
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 3:43 pm
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by NamelessFaceless » Tue Oct 26, 2010 4:30 pm

Bella Fortuna wrote:UPG is/was a company for hire - not solely dedicated to RDFRS productions.

Good questions about the inventory... it'll be interesting to see how things were organised.
Ok, if UBP is not solely dedicated to RDFRS, and depending on the answer to how the inventory was obtained, then UBP should be able to show a simple accounting of:

Sales of RDF items $XXXXX
Cost of RDF items $ (XXX)
Profit from RDF items $ XX
Donation to RDF $ (XX)
Remainder $ -0-

Any other expense the company had is not relevant. At least not to RDFRS. I'm sure it would still be relevant to the IRS and California Franchise Tax Board that the company was deducting what appears to be personal expenses of the shareholder. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if UBP and JT were audited as a result of this. In fact, the IRS has a tip hotline just for this sort of thing.

Meekychuppet
Seriously, what happened?
Posts: 4193
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 8:19 pm
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by Meekychuppet » Tue Oct 26, 2010 4:37 pm

The Mad Hatter wrote:Video? What Video?
Rum wrote:Does it occur to you that you have subscribed to the model of maleness you seem to be pushing in order to justify your innately hostile and aggressive nature? I have noticed it often and even wondered if it might be some sort of personality disorder. You should consider this possibility.

Rum wrote:Did I leave out being a twat? (With ref to your sig)
Things Rum has diagnosed me with to date: "personality disorder", autism, Aspergers.
eRvin wrote:People can see what a fucking freak you are. Have you not noticed all the disparaging comments you get?
rum wrote:What a cunt you are. Truly.

Meekychuppet
Seriously, what happened?
Posts: 4193
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 8:19 pm
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by Meekychuppet » Tue Oct 26, 2010 4:40 pm

The naivety here is rather surprising. There was no contract in writing as far as I know, he will get away with it.
Rum wrote:Does it occur to you that you have subscribed to the model of maleness you seem to be pushing in order to justify your innately hostile and aggressive nature? I have noticed it often and even wondered if it might be some sort of personality disorder. You should consider this possibility.

Rum wrote:Did I leave out being a twat? (With ref to your sig)
Things Rum has diagnosed me with to date: "personality disorder", autism, Aspergers.
eRvin wrote:People can see what a fucking freak you are. Have you not noticed all the disparaging comments you get?
rum wrote:What a cunt you are. Truly.

User avatar
kiki5711
Forever with Ekwok
Posts: 3954
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:51 am
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by kiki5711 » Tue Oct 26, 2010 4:41 pm

Thinking Aloud wrote:Oh - we all need to chill out, by the way:
Trigger Warning!!!1! :
Someone on [url=http://www.rationalskepticism.org/news-politics/dawkins-sues-josh-timonen-t14455-1440.html#p537138]RatSkep[/url] wrote:I do not share the Dawkins hate that some here seem to have, although it's nothing compared to Ratz... Jesus, I was just there and I'm remembering where all the "OMG they killed 'Off Topic' " people went. Now that was a hysterical overreaction if ever I saw one. Some of those people need to chill the fuck out and get a sense of proportion.
Might as well have a little dig while we're talking about the same thing...
wow, WTH? :shock: :shock:

User avatar
Equivokate
Posts: 219
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 8:12 pm
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by Equivokate » Tue Oct 26, 2010 4:43 pm

Better put in an appearance. I am so caught up on Ratskep I have ended up forgetting my *other half* so to speak of the RDF/Ratskep/Ratioanlia Experience. Bring on Justice Vindication and RESTORATION!!


devogue

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by devogue » Tue Oct 26, 2010 4:46 pm

Thinking Aloud wrote:
Someone on [url=http://www.rationalskepticism.org/news-politics/dawkins-sues-josh-timonen-t14455-1440.html#p537138]RatSkep[/url] wrote:I do not share the Dawkins hate that some here seem to have, although it's nothing compared to Ratz... Jesus, I was just there and I'm remembering where all the "OMG they killed 'Off Topic' " people went. Now that was a hysterical overreaction if ever I saw one. Some of those people need to chill the fuck out and get a sense of proportion.
Might as well have a little dig while we're talking about the same thing...[/spoiler]
Ha ha!

487 posts about Josh drama on Ratz.

1720 posts about Josh drama on Ratskep.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Tue Oct 26, 2010 4:48 pm

devogue wrote:
Thinking Aloud wrote:
Someone on [url=http://www.rationalskepticism.org/news-politics/dawkins-sues-josh-timonen-t14455-1440.html#p537138]RatSkep[/url] wrote:I do not share the Dawkins hate that some here seem to have, although it's nothing compared to Ratz... Jesus, I was just there and I'm remembering where all the "OMG they killed 'Off Topic' " people went. Now that was a hysterical overreaction if ever I saw one. Some of those people need to chill the fuck out and get a sense of proportion.
Might as well have a little dig while we're talking about the same thing...[/spoiler]
Ha ha!

487 posts about Josh drama on Ratz.

1720 posts about Josh drama on Ratskep.
But what about high-quality, rationally skeptical posts?
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

devogue

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by devogue » Tue Oct 26, 2010 4:50 pm

Gawdzilla wrote:
devogue wrote:
Thinking Aloud wrote:
Someone on [url=http://www.rationalskepticism.org/news-politics/dawkins-sues-josh-timonen-t14455-1440.html#p537138]RatSkep[/url] wrote:I do not share the Dawkins hate that some here seem to have, although it's nothing compared to Ratz... Jesus, I was just there and I'm remembering where all the "OMG they killed 'Off Topic' " people went. Now that was a hysterical overreaction if ever I saw one. Some of those people need to chill the fuck out and get a sense of proportion.
Might as well have a little dig while we're talking about the same thing...[/spoiler]
Ha ha!

487 posts about Josh drama on Ratz.

1720 posts about Josh drama on Ratskep.
But what about high-quality, rationally skeptical posts?
No such thing in drama. It has to burn hot.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Tue Oct 26, 2010 4:51 pm

devogue wrote:No such thing in drama. It has to burn hot.
Shouldn't be allow at RDF jr. :mod:
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Bella Fortuna
Sister Golden Hair
Posts: 79685
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require.
Location: Scotlifornia
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by Bella Fortuna » Tue Oct 26, 2010 4:52 pm

devogue wrote:
Thinking Aloud wrote:
Someone on [url=http://www.rationalskepticism.org/news-politics/dawkins-sues-josh-timonen-t14455-1440.html#p537138]RatSkep[/url] wrote:I do not share the Dawkins hate that some here seem to have, although it's nothing compared to Ratz... Jesus, I was just there and I'm remembering where all the "OMG they killed 'Off Topic' " people went. Now that was a hysterical overreaction if ever I saw one. Some of those people need to chill the fuck out and get a sense of proportion.
Might as well have a little dig while we're talking about the same thing...[/spoiler]
Ha ha!

487 posts about Josh drama on Ratz.

1720 posts about Josh drama on Ratskep.
Pots and kettles, eh? :awesome:
Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Image
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest