I guess we don't have to worry about "religious right" closed mindedness here, then.Randydeluxe wrote: -- Christine O’Donnell, as a guest on The O’Reilly Factor, 2007
"I dabbled into witchcraft -- I never joined a coven. But I did, I did. ... I dabbled into witchcraft. I hung around people who were doing these things. I'm not making this stuff up. I know what they told me they do. [...] One of my first dates with a witch was on a satanic altar, and I didn't know it. I mean, there's little blood there and stuff like that. ... We went to a movie and then had a midnight picnic on a satanic altar."
The US elections in November, 2010.
- Warren Dew
- Posts: 3781
- Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
- Location: Somerville, MA, USA
- Contact:
Re: The US elections in November, 2010.
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: The US elections in November, 2010.
"Gallup's generic ballot for the week of Sept. 13-19 shows a 46% Democratic and 45% Republican split in registered voters' preferences for the midterm congressional elections. It is the second week out of the last three in which the two parties have been virtually tied."
http://www.gallup.com/poll/143132/Gener ... 0Headlines
http://www.gallup.com/poll/143132/Gener ... 0Headlines
Re: The US elections in November, 2010.
Ignore those numbers: there's a big difference between registered voters and likely voters, especially in mid-term elections.Deersbee wrote:"Gallup's generic ballot for the week of Sept. 13-19 shows a 46% Democratic and 45% Republican split in registered voters' preferences for the midterm congressional elections. It is the second week out of the last three in which the two parties have been virtually tied."
http://www.gallup.com/poll/143132/Gener ... 0Headlines
Re: The US elections in November, 2010.
This guy expresses my thoughts on the Tea Party and the potential for GOP ruin in 2012 very nicely!
Palin is the new McGovern
http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and- ... -mcgovern/
Palin is the new McGovern
http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and- ... -mcgovern/
Re: The US elections in November, 2010.
Let's hope they don't use voting machines:
[youtubeuk]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tSEOXRLSpVc[/youtubeuk]

[youtubeuk]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tSEOXRLSpVc[/youtubeuk]
-
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: The US elections in November, 2010.
Gallup’s astonishing numbers and the Lake Superior congressional districts
By: Michael Barone
Senior Political Analyst
10/04/10 11:55 PM EDT
Late yesterday, Gallup came out with new numbers on the generic ballot question—which party’s candidates would you vote for in the election for House of Representatives? Among registered voters Gallup shows Republicans ahead by 46%-42%, about as good a score as Republicans have ever had (and about as bad a score as Democrats have ever had) since Gallup started asking the question in 1942.
However, Gallup also shows the results for two different turnout models. Under its “high turnout model” Republicans lead 53%-40%. Under its “low turnout model” Republicans lead 56%-38%.
These two numbers, if translated into popular votes in the 435 congressional districts, suggest huge gains for Republicans and a Republican House majority the likes of which we have not seen since the election cycles of 1946 or even 1928. For months, people have been asking me if this year looks like ’94. My response is that the poll numbers suggest it looks like 1994, when Republicans gained 52 seats in a House of 435 seats. Or perhaps somewhat better for Republicans and worse for Democrats. The Gallup high turnout and low turnout numbers suggest it looks like 1894, when Republicans gained more than 100 seats in a House of approximately 350 seats.
Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opini ... z11VIOrBzd
Re: The US elections in November, 2010.
If Republicans get in it'll be like bloody 1984.
"The fact is that far more crime and child abuse has been committed by zealots in the name of God, Jesus and Mohammed than has ever been committed in the name of Satan. Many people don't like that statement but few can argue with it."
-
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: The US elections in November, 2010.
What does that mean, like 1984?The Mad Hatter wrote:If Republicans get in it'll be like bloody 1984.
Re: The US elections in November, 2010.
Coito ergo sum wrote:What does that mean, like 1984?The Mad Hatter wrote:If Republicans get in it'll be like bloody 1984.
Tonight we're gonna party like it's 1984. (Won't Christine O'Donnell tell me what a Wang Chung is?)
Who needs a signature anyway?
-
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: The US elections in November, 2010.
Working class whites shunning the Democrats: http://apnews.myway.com/article/20101006/D9IM5PT80.html


-
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: The US elections in November, 2010.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/10 ... latestnewsDAYTON, Minn. -- Vice President Joe Biden has told Democrats at a Minnesota fundraiser that he'll "strangle" members of the GOP who complain about the federal budget.
According to a pool report from Tuesday's event in Dayton, Biden was telling the crowd that Democrats know how to balance the budget. He said, "If I hear one more Republican tell me about balancing the budget, I am going to strangle them."
That's one way to win the elections!
-
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: The US elections in November, 2010.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-10-1 ... oters.html
Democrats are running AGAINST Obama's accomplishments, and bragging about voting with republicans 65% of the time! http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/ ... ml?showall
Barney Frank, of course, doesn't give a shit - he's still raking in the perks of being in Congress! Free private jet flights! Woo hoo!!! http://www.bostonherald.com/news/politi ... id=1288443
Obama says that he should have factored TAX CUTS into the "stimulus" plan, and that there IS NO SUCH THING AS A SHOVEL READY JOB!!!! http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2010 ... -and-back/
The wheels are coming off the bus...
Nice carbon footprint! LOLHe’s flown 330,000 miles since taking office, the equivalent of circling the globe 13 times,

LOL - the Vice President's job is to campaign for the President, perpetually, while the President descries perpetual campaigns..... and, it's a hard sell, because it isn't working! That's why unemployment is still through the roof, and the stock market is being artificially propped up by the gov't printing money, and the housing market continuing to get worse, the debt increasing by unprecedented numbers, and the Fed floating the idea of impending inflation as somehow a "fix" to the economy!much of it campaigning for Democrats and telling anxious voters that the $814 billion stimulus measure is working. Vice President Joe Biden knows it’s a hard sell.
Well, yeah, because "created or saved" is a bullshit, made-up-out-of-whole-cloth statistic that means exactly zip, zilch, nada.With unemployment topping 9.5 percent for 14 straight months, Biden is having difficulty trumpeting the 3.3 million jobs created or saved by the White House’s economic stimulus.
l Well, yes, because intuitively, it's not flippin' working, and to say it is working is, therefore, counterintuitive. While not extraordinarily adept at abstract thinking, the American people are fairly good at simple if-then statements.“It’s just really hard to convince people that when there weren’t, up until the first of the year, when there weren’t net new jobs it’s awful hard to say, ‘It’s working,’” he said at the end of a three-state campaign swing Oct. 7-8 for four Democratic candidates in Wisconsin, Missouri, and Washington. “It’s counterintuitive.”
Democrats are running AGAINST Obama's accomplishments, and bragging about voting with republicans 65% of the time! http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/ ... ml?showall
Barney Frank, of course, doesn't give a shit - he's still raking in the perks of being in Congress! Free private jet flights! Woo hoo!!! http://www.bostonherald.com/news/politi ... id=1288443
Obama says that he should have factored TAX CUTS into the "stimulus" plan, and that there IS NO SUCH THING AS A SHOVEL READY JOB!!!! http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2010 ... -and-back/
The wheels are coming off the bus...

Re: The US elections in November, 2010.
I'm going to re-post this exactly two years from now.Coito ergo sum wrote: The wheels are coming off the bus...

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], L'Emmerdeur and 14 guests