Muslims win again on 911 - Obama happy!

[sandinista]

yah

Not for real..

if true...even worse.

[Cunt]

yah

Not for real..

if true...even worse.

That's right, sandinista, it's bad, and if it's not bad, it's worse.

[kiki5711]

I don't see it as a win for muslims by stepping down. In fact, this has placed the ball into muslims court to see what gesture of "acts towards peace" will they do. If they do not move the location of the mosque, they will appear even more insensitive and cruel. The pastor in Florida will look like the hero and they will look like the bully on the street.

[RuleBritannia]

Obama's not a Muslim.. he's worse than that: he's atheist!!!

A pussy atheist, though, still in the fucking closet!

Not like our PM!

he's a fucking christian.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rvxb0zXk ... r_embedded[/youtube]

I read somewhere that he is a christian on the surface for political reasons only...

Fairly common, I suspect...

Well if you read it somewhere it must be true...

Seriously, Obama is a christian nothing he's said or done has ever shown him to be an atheist.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

I just want to thank the administrative team here for implementing the ignore/foe feature in these forums.

I like a nice dish of for breakfast.

[Twoflower]

Obama's not a Muslim.. he's worse than that: he's atheist!!!

A pussy atheist, though, still in the fucking closet!

Not like our PM!

Someone correct me if this is wrong - but I am sure I heard/read recently that in order to run for office in the US you have to have a religion?

Nope, but the only way to win is to be a christian.

[normal]

I think that if you're going to have a burn the Koran day, you should not limit it to the Koran. That seems stupid to me. You should burn all kinds of religious books that exist in abundance around the world. And you should do it ceremoniously. You have one big bonfire with the books, and you take one from each direction of faith and toss it on with a little speech. Perhaps an excerpt from one of the stupidet parts of that particular faith direction.

[Sælir]

I think that if you're going to have a burn the Koran day, you should not limit it to the Koran. That seems stupid to me. You should burn all kinds of religious books that exist in abundance around the world. And you should do it ceremoniously. You have one big bonfire with the books, and you take one from each direction of faith and toss it on with a little speech. Perhaps an excerpt from one of the stupidet parts of that particular faith direction.

Why would you then call it " Burn the Koran day"?

[Pappa]

I think that if you're going to have a burn the Koran day, you should not limit it to the Koran. That seems stupid to me. You should burn all kinds of religious books that exist in abundance around the world. And you should do it ceremoniously. You have one big bonfire with the books, and you take one from each direction of faith and toss it on with a little speech. Perhaps an excerpt from one of the stupidet parts of that particular faith direction.

Why would you then call it " Burn the Koran day"?

[normal]

I think that if you're going to have a burn the Koran day, you should not limit it to the Koran. That seems stupid to me. You should burn all kinds of religious books that exist in abundance around the world. And you should do it ceremoniously. You have one big bonfire with the books, and you take one from each direction of faith and toss it on with a little speech. Perhaps an excerpt from one of the stupidet parts of that particular faith direction.

Why would you then call it " Burn the Koran day"?

[maiforpeace]

Obama's not a Muslim.. he's worse than that: he's atheist!!!

A pussy atheist, though, still in the fucking closet!

Not like our PM!

Someone correct me if this is wrong - but I am sure I heard/read recently that in order to run for office in the US you have to have a religion?

"No religious test is required to run for office..." is in our constitution.

However, Arkansas, Maryland, Mississippi, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee and Texas all have wording in their constitutions that you can be disqualified from public office if you deny the existence of a supreme being.

Tennessee, Article 9, Section 2:

No person who denies the being of God, or a future state of rewards and punishments, shall hold any office in the civil department of this state.

Texas, Article 1, Section 4:

No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office, or public trust, in this State; nor shall any one be excluded from holding office on account of his religious sentiments, provided he acknowledge the existence of a Supreme Being.

[Sælir]

"No religious test is required to run for office..." is in our constitution.

However, Arkansas, Maryland, Mississippi, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee and Texas all have wording in their constitutions that you can be disqualified from public office if you deny the existence of a supreme being.

Tennessee, Article 9, Section 2:

No person who denies the being of God, or a future state of rewards and punishments, shall hold any office in the civil department of this state.

Texas, Article 1, Section 4:

No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office, or public trust, in this State; nor shall any one be excluded from holding office on account of his religious sentiments, provided he acknowledge the existence of a Supreme Being.

Wow, that´s really fucked up!

[Twoflower]

"No religious test is required to run for office..." is in our constitution.

However, Arkansas, Maryland, Mississippi, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee and Texas all have wording in their constitutions that you can be disqualified from public office if you deny the existence of a supreme being.

Tennessee, Article 9, Section 2:

No person who denies the being of God, or a future state of rewards and punishments, shall hold any office in the civil department of this state.

Texas, Article 1, Section 4:

No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office, or public trust, in this State; nor shall any one be excluded from holding office on account of his religious sentiments, provided he acknowledge the existence of a Supreme Being.

Wow, that´s really fucked up!

However in cases where this arises the US Constitution always trumps state constitutions. So if a state has a law in their constitution that goes against the us constitution that law isn't valid.

[Pappa]

"No religious test is required to run for office..." is in our constitution.

However, Arkansas, Maryland, Mississippi, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee and Texas all have wording in their constitutions that you can be disqualified from public office if you deny the existence of a supreme being.

Tennessee, Article 9, Section 2:

No person who denies the being of God, or a future state of rewards and punishments, shall hold any office in the civil department of this state.

Texas, Article 1, Section 4:

No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office, or public trust, in this State; nor shall any one be excluded from holding office on account of his religious sentiments, provided he acknowledge the existence of a Supreme Being.

Wow, that´s really fucked up!

However in cases where this arises the US Constitution always trumps state constitutions. So if a state has a law in their constitution that goes against the us constitution that law isn't valid.

But does it have to be taken to the Supreme Court for that to be enforced?

[Twoflower]

"No religious test is required to run for office..." is in our constitution.

However, Arkansas, Maryland, Mississippi, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee and Texas all have wording in their constitutions that you can be disqualified from public office if you deny the existence of a supreme being.

Tennessee, Article 9, Section 2:

No person who denies the being of God, or a future state of rewards and punishments, shall hold any office in the civil department of this state.

Texas, Article 1, Section 4:

No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office, or public trust, in this State; nor shall any one be excluded from holding office on account of his religious sentiments, provided he acknowledge the existence of a Supreme Being.

Wow, that´s really fucked up!

However in cases where this arises the US Constitution always trumps state constitutions. So if a state has a law in their constitution that goes against the us constitution that law isn't valid.

But does it have to be taken to the Supreme Court for that to be enforced?

Sometimes, a lot of times the courts at the city, county, or state level are able to take care of it.