Bitch throws puppies into river

Post Reply
User avatar
Cunt
Lumpy Vagina Bloodfart
Posts: 19069
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 3:10 am
Contact:

Re: Bitch throws puppies into river

Post by Cunt » Wed Sep 01, 2010 4:19 pm

So how would all of you choose to kill puppies?
I know I wouldn't toss them in a river, but what humane method would you all choose?

I saw another video on 4chan of a dog being beaten to death with a shovel. Many anon's raged about it, but when you consider that the blows were as fast as they were, the wielder was trying to make his kill quickly. If he fucked around for awhile, I would suggest abuse, but doing it fast and certainly is just putting an animal down.

So if you would never kill an animal yourself, think hard before you hate someone for doing the job you admit you couldn't do.
Shit, Piss, Cock, Cunt, Motherfucker, Cocksucker and Tits.
-various artists


Joe wrote:
Wed Nov 29, 2023 1:22 pm
he doesn't communicate
Free speech anywhere, is a threat to tyrants everywhere.

Lozzer
First Only Gay
Posts: 6536
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 12:37 pm
Contact:

Re: Bitch throws puppies into river

Post by Lozzer » Wed Sep 01, 2010 4:28 pm

Cunt wrote:So how would all of you choose to kill puppies?
I know I wouldn't toss them in a river, but what humane method would you all choose?

I saw another video on 4chan of a dog being beaten to death with a shovel. Many anon's raged about it, but when you consider that the blows were as fast as they were, the wielder was trying to make his kill quickly. If he fucked around for awhile, I would suggest abuse, but doing it fast and certainly is just putting an animal down.

So if you would never kill an animal yourself, think hard before you hate someone for doing the job you admit you couldn't do.
This is disingenuous, we aren't discussing how a 'humane' enthusiasm should be performed. And we certainly are not disputing the girl's 'novice' approach. She was killing the puppies, it was an act of cruelty. You can clearly hear going 'weeee' as she did it. It was for entertainment, not a contestable necessity for well-being of the animals.

Unlike third-world barbarians such as herself, here in Britain we put animals to sleep through veterinary application. We do this because we have a responsibility to our pets welfare. If she had to discard these animals for whatever reason, she should have never purchased the mother animal in the first place. If you have to do this, you're in no position for accepting the responsibility entailed through pet ownership.
Last edited by Lozzer on Wed Sep 01, 2010 4:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnneeee

devogue

Re: Bitch throws puppies into river

Post by devogue » Wed Sep 01, 2010 4:28 pm

Cunt wrote:So if you would never kill an animal yourself, think hard before you hate someone for doing the job you admit you couldn't do.
She could have sent the puppies to an abbatoir.

User avatar
maiforpeace
Account Suspended at Member's Request
Posts: 15726
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:41 am
Location: under the redwood trees

Re: Bitch throws puppies into river

Post by maiforpeace » Wed Sep 01, 2010 4:30 pm

Cunt wrote:So how would all of you choose to kill puppies?
I know I wouldn't toss them in a river, but what humane method would you all choose?

I saw another video on 4chan of a dog being beaten to death with a shovel. Many anon's raged about it, but when you consider that the blows were as fast as they were, the wielder was trying to make his kill quickly. If he fucked around for awhile, I would suggest abuse, but doing it fast and certainly is just putting an animal down.

So if you would never kill an animal yourself, think hard before you hate someone for doing the job you admit you couldn't do.
Take them to the humane society and let them euthanize them? They do have them in Germany too.
Atheists have always argued that this world is all that we have, and that our duty is to one another to make the very most and best of it. ~Christopher Hitchens~
Image
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3534/379 ... 3be9_o.jpg[/imgc]

User avatar
Warren Dew
Posts: 3781
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Contact:

Re: Bitch throws puppies into river

Post by Warren Dew » Wed Sep 01, 2010 5:03 pm

maiforpeace wrote:Take them to the humane society and let them euthanize them? They do have them in Germany too.
That was my reaction - presumably they're better at it than I am.

Posting personal information here on this forum seems questionable to me, even if the rule only applies to forum members. It reminds me too much of people who post abortion doctors' personal information on "pro life" web sites.

User avatar
Cunt
Lumpy Vagina Bloodfart
Posts: 19069
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 3:10 am
Contact:

Re: Bitch throws puppies into river

Post by Cunt » Wed Sep 01, 2010 5:17 pm

Lozzer wrote:
Cunt wrote:So how would all of you choose to kill puppies?
I know I wouldn't toss them in a river, but what humane method would you all choose?

I saw another video on 4chan of a dog being beaten to death with a shovel. Many anon's raged about it, but when you consider that the blows were as fast as they were, the wielder was trying to make his kill quickly. If he fucked around for awhile, I would suggest abuse, but doing it fast and certainly is just putting an animal down.

So if you would never kill an animal yourself, think hard before you hate someone for doing the job you admit you couldn't do.
This is disingenuous, we aren't discussing how a 'humane' enthusiasm should be performed. And we certainly are not disputing the girl's 'novice' approach.
Speaking of 'novice', I noticed you missed my questions. Thanks for that.
Lozzer wrote: She was killing the puppies, it was an act of cruelty.
Good of you to make that decision based on a few seconds of video. Even better of you to share it.
Lozzer wrote: You can clearly hear going 'weeee' as she did it. It was for entertainment, not a contestable necessity for well-being of the animals.
Have you ever worked at a slaughterhouse, Lozzer? Occasionally, workers go 'weeee' as they 'do it'. Trust me.
Is your hate equal to the young lady who kills a few one afternoon to a pork processing facility which can 'process' (love them euphemisms!) 6700 pigs in a 7.5h shift.
When you have had to kill an animal, how did you do it? Is hiring a hitman (veterenarian) to do it 'painlessly' more ethical than this method?
Lozzer wrote: Unlike third-world barbarians such as herself, here in Britain we put animals to sleep through veterinary application.
When you say 'we' do you mean you and some other folks who personally kill, or are you just taking some of the credit for others who do this (necessary) dirty work?
Lozzer wrote: We do this because we have a responsibility to our pets welfare. If she had to discard these animals for whatever reason, she should have never purchased the mother animal in the first place. If you have to do this, you're in no position for accepting the responsibility entailed through pet ownership.
So you know that she purchased a mother animal?
Or are you making some assumptions because you already don't like her anyway? Maybe just a little?
-=+OoO+=-
Warren Dew wrote:Posting personal information here on this forum seems questionable to me, even if the rule only applies to forum members. It reminds me too much of people who post abortion doctors' personal information on "pro life" web sites.
A bit harsh, but true enough.

To the poster who put it up - please take it down.
-=+OoO+=-
Shit, Piss, Cock, Cunt, Motherfucker, Cocksucker and Tits.
-various artists


Joe wrote:
Wed Nov 29, 2023 1:22 pm
he doesn't communicate
Free speech anywhere, is a threat to tyrants everywhere.

Lozzer
First Only Gay
Posts: 6536
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 12:37 pm
Contact:

Re: Bitch throws puppies into river

Post by Lozzer » Wed Sep 01, 2010 5:29 pm

Cunt wrote:
Lozzer wrote:
Cunt wrote:So how would all of you choose to kill puppies?
I know I wouldn't toss them in a river, but what humane method would you all choose?

I saw another video on 4chan of a dog being beaten to death with a shovel. Many anon's raged about it, but when you consider that the blows were as fast as they were, the wielder was trying to make his kill quickly. If he fucked around for awhile, I would suggest abuse, but doing it fast and certainly is just putting an animal down.

So if you would never kill an animal yourself, think hard before you hate someone for doing the job you admit you couldn't do.
This is disingenuous, we aren't discussing how a 'humane' enthusiasm should be performed. And we certainly are not disputing the girl's 'novice' approach.
Speaking of 'novice', I noticed you missed my questions. Thanks for that.
Lozzer wrote: She was killing the puppies, it was an act of cruelty.
Good of you to make that decision based on a few seconds of video. Even better of you to share it.
Lozzer wrote: You can clearly hear going 'weeee' as she did it. It was for entertainment, not a contestable necessity for well-being of the animals.
Have you ever worked at a slaughterhouse, Lozzer? Occasionally, workers go 'weeee' as they 'do it'. Trust me.
Is your hate equal to the young lady who kills a few one afternoon to a pork processing facility which can 'process' (love them euphemisms!) 6700 pigs in a 7.5h shift.
When you have had to kill an animal, how did you do it? Is hiring a hitman (veterenarian) to do it 'painlessly' more ethical than this method?
Lozzer wrote: Unlike third-world barbarians such as herself, here in Britain we put animals to sleep through veterinary application.
When you say 'we' do you mean you and some other folks who personally kill, or are you just taking some of the credit for others who do this (necessary) dirty work?
Lozzer wrote: We do this because we have a responsibility to our pets welfare. If she had to discard these animals for whatever reason, she should have never purchased the mother animal in the first place. If you have to do this, you're in no position for accepting the responsibility entailed through pet ownership.
So you know that she purchased a mother animal?
Or are you making some assumptions because you already don't like her anyway? Maybe just a little?
-=+OoO+=-
Warren Dew wrote:Posting personal information here on this forum seems questionable to me, even if the rule only applies to forum members. It reminds me too much of people who post abortion doctors' personal information on "pro life" web sites.
A bit harsh, but true enough.

To the poster who put it up - please take it down.
-=+OoO+=-
I didn't omit your question.

Should she have recorded more than the 40 seconds that she did, maybe I'd have more to go by. It's fair to extrapolate that from the briefness of the clip, she had no intention of journaling anything other than the cruelty.

Now who's making assumptions? Slaughter house workers are professionals, they aren't committed to the job for recreational purposes.

Pigs aren't domestic animals.

So it's a step too far to presume that these puppies had a mother? Maybe you think it's more reasonable to believe they just miraculously manifested out of thin air? Or maybe they were stolen?


No, I wont remove the information. What's someone going to do, send her a letter? Use her height measurements to tailor a dress? ;) One wonders how far these Ratz are willing to go!
nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnneeee

User avatar
Animavore
Nasty Hombre
Posts: 39276
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:26 am
Location: Ire Land.
Contact:

Re: Bitch throws puppies into river

Post by Animavore » Wed Sep 01, 2010 5:32 pm

If I were to kill puppies it wouldn't be like that. I think taking it to the proper authorities is the way to go. That said, I once killed a mouse by chipping it into the top corner of the soccer net after it ran out onto the pitch and laughed my ass off when i was her age so I'm not really in a position to criticise.

It was a great goal though :P
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.

User avatar
RuleBritannia
Cupid is a cunt!
Posts: 1630
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 9:55 pm
About me: About you
Location: The Machine
Contact:

Re: Bitch throws puppies into river

Post by RuleBritannia » Wed Sep 01, 2010 5:35 pm

Cunt wrote:So how would all of you choose to kill puppies?
I know I wouldn't toss them in a river, but what humane method would you all choose?

I saw another video on 4chan of a dog being beaten to death with a shovel. Many anon's raged about it, but when you consider that the blows were as fast as they were, the wielder was trying to make his kill quickly. If he fucked around for awhile, I would suggest abuse, but doing it fast and certainly is just putting an animal down.

So if you would never kill an animal yourself, think hard before you hate someone for doing the job you admit you couldn't do.
I've killed lots of animals, so I guess I'm allowed to comment.

I think any moron can tell you, death from asphyxia is not a quick and painless way to die. Puppies that small and fragile could be killed an infinate amount of instant and painless ways, snap their necks or drop an anvil on their heads, or something. The fact that it was filmed at all means they didn't care about the animals suffering, it was "just a joke" a "bit of fun".
RuleBritannia © MMXI

User avatar
Warren Dew
Posts: 3781
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Contact:

Re: Bitch throws puppies into river

Post by Warren Dew » Wed Sep 01, 2010 5:51 pm

Cunt wrote:When you have had to kill an animal, how did you do it? Is hiring a hitman (veterenarian) to do it 'painlessly' more ethical than this method?
I would hope that they'd manage something somewhat more humane than drowning. That said, drowning isn't as bad as leaving them to starve or something like that.

Lozzer
First Only Gay
Posts: 6536
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 12:37 pm
Contact:

Re: Bitch throws puppies into river

Post by Lozzer » Wed Sep 01, 2010 5:53 pm

Supposedly introducing small mammals (say, mice) to a freezer overnight is possibly one the most humane methods.
nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnneeee

User avatar
Santa_Claus
Your Imaginary Friend
Posts: 1985
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 7:06 pm
About me: Ho! Ho! Ho!
Contact:

Re: Bitch throws puppies into river

Post by Santa_Claus » Wed Sep 01, 2010 5:54 pm

Lozzer wrote:http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=bb4_1283184704

Caution: video is rather upsetting.

The hive mind forum 4chan is currently trying to track her down as they did the woman who put the cat into the bin.
Who is to say that the puppies didn't then swim ashore? and are now living in the lap of luxury?

If it's Bosnia then probably find the Video was shot by Dutch peacekeepers..........
I am Leader of all The Atheists in the world - FACT.

Come look inside Santa's Hole :ninja:

You want to hear the truth about Santa Claus???.....you couldn't handle the truth about Santa Claus!!!

Lozzer
First Only Gay
Posts: 6536
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 12:37 pm
Contact:

Re: Bitch throws puppies into river

Post by Lozzer » Wed Sep 01, 2010 5:55 pm

Santa_Claus wrote:
Lozzer wrote:http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=bb4_1283184704

Caution: video is rather upsetting.

The hive mind forum 4chan is currently trying to track her down as they did the woman who put the cat into the bin.
Who is to say that the puppies didn't then swim ashore? and are now living in the lap of luxury?

If it's Bosnia then probably find the Video was shot by Dutch peacekeepers..........
I think their fins may have been lacking and the odds of fighting the current were very minimal.
Last edited by Lozzer on Wed Sep 01, 2010 5:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnneeee

User avatar
beige
Posts: 577
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 7:52 pm
Location: Bristol, UK
Contact:

Re: Bitch throws puppies into river

Post by beige » Wed Sep 01, 2010 5:55 pm

I heard something on the radio on the way back from hospital today - something about people breaking into an animal shelter and tearing a goat's horns off then breaking its legs. I've not had the chance to look it up yet, as I've just arrived home, but it seems quite... extraordinary.

I can't help but think it'll get far less exposure than the cat bin. I'm not sure if this is worse or not, that's a lot of puppies, but the crime is far less violent. Hurm :s
In the best laid plans of history lie the ruins of the past
And a chronicle of suffering shows the mythic pall they cast
To believe is true religion, but to see is truth at last
Oh no, too late to hold a trial, time doesn't wait for the watchmaker's dial

Image

User avatar
Cunt
Lumpy Vagina Bloodfart
Posts: 19069
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 3:10 am
Contact:

Re: Bitch throws puppies into river

Post by Cunt » Wed Sep 01, 2010 5:56 pm

RuleBritannia wrote:
Cunt wrote:So how would all of you choose to kill puppies?
I know I wouldn't toss them in a river, but what humane method would you all choose?

I saw another video on 4chan of a dog being beaten to death with a shovel. Many anon's raged about it, but when you consider that the blows were as fast as they were, the wielder was trying to make his kill quickly. If he fucked around for awhile, I would suggest abuse, but doing it fast and certainly is just putting an animal down.

So if you would never kill an animal yourself, think hard before you hate someone for doing the job you admit you couldn't do.
I've killed lots of animals, so I guess I'm allowed to comment.

I think any moron can tell you, death from asphyxia is not a quick and painless way to die.
Why would I listen to a moron about something like that?
They drowned (probably) and it could have been quicker, or a LOT worse.
She didn't torture these, that I could see.
And if you decided to film your killing, would you be somber? Would it make a difference? What about the creepy fuckers in the slaughterhouses who joke darkly all day long?
What about the well-known black humour of ER nurses?
Lozzer wrote: Puppies that small and fragile could be killed an infinate amount of instant and painless ways, snap their necks or drop an anvil on their heads, or something. The fact that it was filmed at all means they didn't care about the animals suffering, it was "just a joke" a "bit of fun".
Filming it IS in poor taste, but all they showed was relatively quick killing. Shooting an animal and having to track it for an hour or so is more suffering. I would say when a pig gets the jolt at the top of the shute and doesn't die until after bleeding out a bit (which is after the other guy stabs it in the neck) it's more suffering.

If her goal was torture, why not set one on fire? Bite a head off? What if someone tricked her into being filmed doing a regular farm chore because they wanted 4chan to be their personal army?
Shit, Piss, Cock, Cunt, Motherfucker, Cocksucker and Tits.
-various artists


Joe wrote:
Wed Nov 29, 2023 1:22 pm
he doesn't communicate
Free speech anywhere, is a threat to tyrants everywhere.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 16 guests