
http://www.cnn.com/video/data/2.0/video ... d.cnn.html
Code: Select all
// Replaces with spaces the braces in cases where braces in places cause stasis
$str = str_replace(array("\{","\}")," ",$str);
whaaaa? Name a better one.Gawdzilla wrote:Not Willis's best movie.
Yah I like "safe" cosmetics, I neeeed my lipstick and eyeliner. Fuck everyone.Ghatanothoa wrote:I like safe medicine myself. Fuck the monkeys
This one:sandinista wrote:whaaaa? Name a better one.Gawdzilla wrote:Not Willis's best movie.
This is some of the worst news reporting I've ever seen. We are not informed of what sort of experimentation these animals were "rescued" from. The word "torture" is used repeatedly, along with a great deal of other emotive and editorial content which has no place in a news report without proper definition and provision of exemplars. The actual information content of this report could have been summed up in about five seconds- the other <4 min. are entirely editorial content.sandinista wrote:this is awesome! I'm shocked CNN reported it this way and correctly labeled animal testing as torture. Wow!![]()
http://www.cnn.com/video/data/2.0/video ... d.cnn.html
haha, don't watch much news eh.This is some of the worst news reporting I've ever seen.
Actually, no. I stopped when it began looking like this report.sandinista wrote:haha, don't watch much news eh.This is some of the worst news reporting I've ever seen.
Thanks. I always try to educate the masses, but it seems impossible. When I explain that milk is not made up of "milk" molecules, they are lost already.ScholasticSpastic wrote:
Another thing: That sour-faced news bitch went on and on about how bad "chemicals" are in our products while never once picking out a specific bad "chemical." It was blatant, childish chemo-phobia of the most egregious kind. Many of the "chemicals" which are incorporated into our products are there because they are, in fact, preferable to the "natural" ingredients they're replacing. Chemo-phobes tend to present us with untenable and sophomoric false dichotomies when they go on their pathetic little rants.
ScholasticSpastic wrote:This is some of the worst news reporting I've ever seen. We are not informed of what sort of experimentation these animals were "rescued" from. The word "torture" is used repeatedly, along with a great deal of other emotive and editorial content which has no place in a news report without proper definition and provision of exemplars. The actual information content of this report could have been summed up in about five seconds- the other <4 min. are entirely editorial content.sandinista wrote:this is awesome! I'm shocked CNN reported it this way and correctly labeled animal testing as torture. Wow!![]()
http://www.cnn.com/video/data/2.0/video ... d.cnn.html
We need animal testing. Most of us are alive right now because of past animal testing and more of us will live better later because of animal testing. It is difficult to stomach, but it is a necessary tool for understanding our physiology, psychology, and responses to chemicals.
Another thing: That sour-faced news bitch went on and on about how bad "chemicals" are in our products while never once picking out a specific bad "chemical." It was blatant, childish chemo-phobia of the most egregious kind. Many of the "chemicals" which are incorporated into our products are there because they are, in fact, preferable to the "natural" ingredients they're replacing. Chemo-phobes tend to present us with untenable and sophomoric false dichotomies when they go on their pathetic little rants.
CNN appears to have finished their transition to the Faux News format. As if we needed another one.
I am concerned that any forum members fixate on cosmetic testing. Most animal testing is not cosmetic testing. We're just fed that info because it's easier for PETA and other animal liberation nut-jobs to get us upset about it than the essential work which cannot be completed or even begun without animal testing.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests