How so?Animavore wrote:Or Ghat is being really clever trying to protect his ass.
I'll read the threads again, I think ...
Moderator: Mafia Mods
How so?Animavore wrote:Or Ghat is being really clever trying to protect his ass.
Huh? Or telling the truth.Normal wrote:So Ani... Is insane or lying?higgs2 wrote:Only with an insane seer.Charlou wrote:Do any other players have previous experience or rule knowledge of vigilante viewing as scum?
So, no.
By being really clever in saying "Go ahead and vote me and then lynch Ani when it turns out I'm innocent". It could be a huge bluff.Charlou wrote:How so?Animavore wrote:Or Ghat is being really clever trying to protect his ass.
I'll read the threads again, I think ...
Ani just didn't know that Vigs view as town.Normal wrote:So Ani... Is insane or lying?higgs2 wrote:Only with an insane seer.Charlou wrote:Do any other players have previous experience or rule knowledge of vigilante viewing as scum?
So, no.
It's basically a horrible role in which you are town, you win with town, but you view as scum.Animavore wrote:A "miller"? What's that?
Never heard of it.higgs2 wrote:It's basically a horrible role in which you are town, you win with town, but you view as scum.Animavore wrote:A "miller"? What's that?
They would be gambling that we don't have a seer who could counterclaim.Animavore wrote:By being really clever in saying "Go ahead and vote me and then lynch Ani when it turns out I'm innocent". It could be a huge bluff.Charlou wrote:How so?Animavore wrote:Or Ghat is being really clever trying to protect his ass.
I'll read the threads again, I think ...
Okay, benefit of the doubt for now, but interested in anything others have to add ... unvoteZigmen wrote:Ani just didn't know that Vigs view as town.Normal wrote:So Ani... Is insane or lying?higgs2 wrote:Only with an insane seer.Charlou wrote:Do any other players have previous experience or rule knowledge of vigilante viewing as scum?
So, no.
Also, lack of understanding does not mean its a scum tell.
I would doubt that this game would have an insane (paranoid) seer. I also doubt that Ani is lying. We will know by the end of the day if Ani was lying, and we will deal with him then. Right now, we need to assume he's the seer and that Ghan is scum. Short of a counterclaim by another seer, we have no reason to doubt him.
It won't make much difference. Ghan needs to die no matter what. Either he's scum and needs to die, or Ani is lying and Ghan needs to die to prove it.Animavore wrote: By being really clever in saying "Go ahead and vote me and then lynch Ani when it turns out I'm innocent". It could be a huge bluff.
Zigmen wrote:It won't make much difference. Ghan needs to die no matter what. Either he's scum and needs to die, or Ani is lying and Ghan needs to die to prove it.Animavore wrote: By being really clever in saying "Go ahead and vote me and then lynch Ani when it turns out I'm innocent". It could be a huge bluff.
Code: Select all
// Replaces with spaces the braces in cases where braces in places cause stasis
$str = str_replace(array("\{","\}")," ",$str);
Because 1 scum is dead. I have a guilty view on another. There can only be 3 at most. Could be 4 but I doubt it. It made sense to come forth with the information now instead of risking dying with the information.higgs2 wrote:Why did ani out so early? Day 2?
There's another option you can use in the future. If you did die, we would all read back your previous posts. You could have hidden your views as FoSes like: "I get the sense that Ghat is scummy."Animavore wrote:Because 1 scum is dead. I have a guilty view on another. There can only be 3 at most. Could be 4 but I doubt it. It made sense to come forth with the information now instead of risking dying with the information.higgs2 wrote:Why did ani out so early? Day 2?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests