I love Ghost WorldAnimavore wrote:never heard of it. it looks like beavis and butt-head meets ghost world.

I love Ghost WorldAnimavore wrote:never heard of it. it looks like beavis and butt-head meets ghost world.
That was the point of the show.Tails Turrosaki wrote:I always thought Beavis and Butthead was stupid.What the fuck was the point of that
show?
I'm getting a nosebleed. Anti-war? The very idea! The sight of a French ship in flames? What could be finer?Tails Turrosaki wrote:Too anti-war to be doing such personal absurdities.Clinton Huxley wrote:This explains a lot about young people. You should all be in the Navy.
I'm not very violent. Dramatic, yes, but not violent. I do not like the idea of killing others over different ideas. They got communism? Let 'em have communism. They got terrorism? Let 'em have terrorism (they're all bound to die off anyways, obviously). They got different religions?? Let 'em have different religions. We gotta stop interfering with this bullshit.Clinton Huxley wrote:I'm getting a nosebleed. Anti-war? The very idea! The sight of a French ship in flames? What could be finer?Tails Turrosaki wrote:Too anti-war to be doing such personal absurdities.Clinton Huxley wrote:This explains a lot about young people. You should all be in the Navy.
I never watch "Television"
England once fought a war against France that lasted over 100 years. Happy days.Tails Turrosaki wrote:I'm not very violent. Dramatic, yes, but not violent. I do not like the idea of killing others over different ideas. They got communism? Let 'em have communism. They got terrorism? Let 'em have terrorism (they're all bound to die off anyways, obviously). They got different religions?? Let 'em have different religions. We gotta stop interfering with this bullshit.Clinton Huxley wrote:I'm getting a nosebleed. Anti-war? The very idea! The sight of a French ship in flames? What could be finer?Tails Turrosaki wrote:Too anti-war to be doing such personal absurdities.Clinton Huxley wrote:This explains a lot about young people. You should all be in the Navy.
I never watch "Television"
England and France were always at each other's necks for no reason really. I'm not surprised.Clinton Huxley wrote:England once fought a war against France that lasted over 100 years. Happy days.Tails Turrosaki wrote:I'm not very violent. Dramatic, yes, but not violent. I do not like the idea of killing others over different ideas. They got communism? Let 'em have communism. They got terrorism? Let 'em have terrorism (they're all bound to die off anyways, obviously). They got different religions?? Let 'em have different religions. We gotta stop interfering with this bullshit.Clinton Huxley wrote:I'm getting a nosebleed. Anti-war? The very idea! The sight of a French ship in flames? What could be finer?Tails Turrosaki wrote:Too anti-war to be doing such personal absurdities.Clinton Huxley wrote:This explains a lot about young people. You should all be in the Navy.
I never watch "Television"
So let's say - just as an example - that half of the states in the USA vote that homosexuals should be allowed to marry and then, due to religious reasons, the other half decide to outlaw homosexuality and enforce compulsory 'conversion' of gays with the castration penalty for refuseniks. A civil war then breaks out - still too blasé to interfere? What if the anti-gay states start winning the war, due - in part at least - to the indifference of its opponents? How far from your front door before you start to fight? Or would you simply pass as straight and put your gayness down to some childish whim?Tails Turrosaki wrote:I'm not very violent. Dramatic, yes, but not violent. I do not like the idea of killing others over different ideas. They got communism? Let 'em have communism. They got terrorism? Let 'em have terrorism (they're all bound to die off anyways, obviously). They got different religions?? Let 'em have different religions. We gotta stop interfering with this bullshit.Clinton Huxley wrote:I'm getting a nosebleed. Anti-war? The very idea! The sight of a French ship in flames? What could be finer?Tails Turrosaki wrote:Too anti-war to be doing such personal absurdities.Clinton Huxley wrote:This explains a lot about young people. You should all be in the Navy.
I never watch "Television"
Actually, I'm talking about interfering with another country, with a whole different style of government, ethics, principles, etc. You're talking about civil wars, which are different in my case. Even though I wouldn't join in the war, I'd just cheer on because I'm a pussy.Xamonas Chegwé wrote:So let's say - just as an example - that half of the states in the USA vote that homosexuals should be allowed to marry and then, due to religious reasons, the other half decide to outlaw homosexuality and enforce compulsory 'conversion' of gays with the castration penalty for refuseniks. A civil war then breaks out - still too blasé to interfere? What if the anti-gay states start winning the war, due - in part at least - to the indifference of its opponents? How far from your front door before you start to fight? Or would you simply pass as straight and put your gayness down to some childish whim?Tails Turrosaki wrote:I'm not very violent. Dramatic, yes, but not violent. I do not like the idea of killing others over different ideas. They got communism? Let 'em have communism. They got terrorism? Let 'em have terrorism (they're all bound to die off anyways, obviously). They got different religions?? Let 'em have different religions. We gotta stop interfering with this bullshit.Clinton Huxley wrote:I'm getting a nosebleed. Anti-war? The very idea! The sight of a French ship in flames? What could be finer?Tails Turrosaki wrote:Too anti-war to be doing such personal absurdities.Clinton Huxley wrote:This explains a lot about young people. You should all be in the Navy.
I never watch "Television"
Now pretend you were black - and it was 1860 - and you lived in Kentucky, or Missouri - teetering right on the edge of the conflict. Do you see now how people can justify wars? It is easy to be a pacifist when nobody is trying to cut off your balls, remove your right vote or steal the bread from your children's mouths. We all have our tipping points though - what's yours?
No, because-... ... Well, dammit. I forgot.Xamonas Chegwé wrote:They are different, why? Because you are close enough to them for them to affect you directly? Pacifism is a luxury bought for you by the willingness of others to fight on your behalf. War should be a tactic of last resort, I agree, but ruling it out of the list of options is not yet possible for any state.
There is - but you're not old enough for that yet.Tails Turrosaki wrote:No, because-... ... Well, dammit. I forgot.Xamonas Chegwé wrote:They are different, why? Because you are close enough to them for them to affect you directly? Pacifism is a luxury bought for you by the willingness of others to fight on your behalf. War should be a tactic of last resort, I agree, but ruling it out of the list of options is not yet possible for any state.
... I wonder if there's any sort of food that improves memory.
Xamonas Chegwé wrote:There is - but you're not old enough for that yet.Tails Turrosaki wrote:No, because-... ... Well, dammit. I forgot.Xamonas Chegwé wrote:They are different, why? Because you are close enough to them for them to affect you directly? Pacifism is a luxury bought for you by the willingness of others to fight on your behalf. War should be a tactic of last resort, I agree, but ruling it out of the list of options is not yet possible for any state.
... I wonder if there's any sort of food that improves memory.
You're the one that said you're a pussy, pussy.Tails Turrosaki wrote:Pussy 'bout what?RappingAgnostic wrote:TT-Stop being a pussy.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest