The UK election thread

Post Reply
User avatar
RuleBritannia
Cupid is a cunt!
Posts: 1630
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 9:55 pm
About me: About you
Location: The Machine
Contact:

Re: The UK election thread

Post by RuleBritannia » Thu Apr 22, 2010 7:33 pm

If you go here and click on "Live Voter Reaction" under the video, you can see the opinion bars go up and down.
RuleBritannia © MMXI

User avatar
RuleBritannia
Cupid is a cunt!
Posts: 1630
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 9:55 pm
About me: About you
Location: The Machine
Contact:

Re: The UK election thread

Post by RuleBritannia » Thu Apr 22, 2010 7:42 pm

Nick Clegg just lost serious points with me over the pope issue.
RuleBritannia © MMXI

User avatar
Rum
Absent Minded Processor
Posts: 37285
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
Contact:

Re: The UK election thread

Post by Rum » Thu Apr 22, 2010 8:44 pm

Thought it went less well than the first one. Too much easy point scoring and bickering and not enough on policy.

Switched off as a result. :ddpan:

User avatar
RuleBritannia
Cupid is a cunt!
Posts: 1630
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 9:55 pm
About me: About you
Location: The Machine
Contact:

Re: The UK election thread

Post by RuleBritannia » Thu Apr 22, 2010 8:46 pm

YouGov poll on who won the debate:

36% Cameron
32% Clegg
29% Brown
RuleBritannia © MMXI

Wasted Tourist
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 4:07 pm
Contact:

Re: The UK election thread

Post by Wasted Tourist » Thu Apr 22, 2010 8:49 pm

Brown steamrollered this debate, Cameron looked like he wanted to throw in the towel at the end.

Cameron used the Pope question to suck up to religious types, while the other two were unequivocal in their opposition to the Pope's views. I actually disagree with some of the secular groups denying his freedom of movement, which doesn't seem to have any rational basis.

User avatar
RuleBritannia
Cupid is a cunt!
Posts: 1630
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 9:55 pm
About me: About you
Location: The Machine
Contact:

Re: The UK election thread

Post by RuleBritannia » Thu Apr 22, 2010 8:53 pm

Wasted Tourist wrote:Brown steamrollered this debate, Cameron looked like he wanted to throw in the towel at the end.

Cameron used the Pope question to suck up to religious types, while the other two were unequivocal in their opposition to the Pope's views. I actually disagree with some of the secular groups denying his freedom of movement, which doesn't seem to have any rational basis.
The secular groups aren't saying he can't come to Britain, they're saying the tax payer shouldn't pay for it.
RuleBritannia © MMXI

Wasted Tourist
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 4:07 pm
Contact:

Re: The UK election thread

Post by Wasted Tourist » Thu Apr 22, 2010 9:01 pm

RuleBritannia wrote:
Wasted Tourist wrote:Brown steamrollered this debate, Cameron looked like he wanted to throw in the towel at the end.

Cameron used the Pope question to suck up to religious types, while the other two were unequivocal in their opposition to the Pope's views. I actually disagree with some of the secular groups denying his freedom of movement, which doesn't seem to have any rational basis.
The secular groups aren't saying he can't come to Britain, they're saying the tax payer shouldn't pay for it.

Why? Because his place of work is loaded? Were the secular groups complaining with the wealthy author Salman Rushdie had tax funded protection for his freedoms?

User avatar
RuleBritannia
Cupid is a cunt!
Posts: 1630
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 9:55 pm
About me: About you
Location: The Machine
Contact:

Re: The UK election thread

Post by RuleBritannia » Thu Apr 22, 2010 9:13 pm

Wasted Tourist wrote:
RuleBritannia wrote:
Wasted Tourist wrote:Brown steamrollered this debate, Cameron looked like he wanted to throw in the towel at the end.

Cameron used the Pope question to suck up to religious types, while the other two were unequivocal in their opposition to the Pope's views. I actually disagree with some of the secular groups denying his freedom of movement, which doesn't seem to have any rational basis.
The secular groups aren't saying he can't come to Britain, they're saying the tax payer shouldn't pay for it.

Why? Because his place of work is loaded? Were the secular groups complaining with the wealthy author Salman Rushdie had tax funded protection for his freedoms?
Salman Rushdie is British citizen who had fatwā issued aginst is life, it's not even close to a comparison.
RuleBritannia © MMXI

Wasted Tourist
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 4:07 pm
Contact:

Re: The UK election thread

Post by Wasted Tourist » Thu Apr 22, 2010 9:20 pm

RuleBritannia wrote:
Wasted Tourist wrote:
RuleBritannia wrote:
Wasted Tourist wrote:Brown steamrollered this debate, Cameron looked like he wanted to throw in the towel at the end.

Cameron used the Pope question to suck up to religious types, while the other two were unequivocal in their opposition to the Pope's views. I actually disagree with some of the secular groups denying his freedom of movement, which doesn't seem to have any rational basis.
The secular groups aren't saying he can't come to Britain, they're saying the tax payer shouldn't pay for it.

Why? Because his place of work is loaded? Were the secular groups complaining with the wealthy author Salman Rushdie had tax funded protection for his freedoms?
Salman Rushdie is British citizen who had fatwā issued aginst is life, it's not even close to a comparison.
Well I agree, but there isn't a case for either men's freedom to be compromised, and the law and government should protect that freedom by applying universal rules, rules apply to everyone, regardless of whether or not you happen to disagree with them , which is really what this whole shebang is about.

User avatar
RuleBritannia
Cupid is a cunt!
Posts: 1630
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 9:55 pm
About me: About you
Location: The Machine
Contact:

Re: The UK election thread

Post by RuleBritannia » Thu Apr 22, 2010 9:26 pm

Wasted Tourist wrote:
RuleBritannia wrote:
Wasted Tourist wrote:
RuleBritannia wrote:
Wasted Tourist wrote:Brown steamrollered this debate, Cameron looked like he wanted to throw in the towel at the end.

Cameron used the Pope question to suck up to religious types, while the other two were unequivocal in their opposition to the Pope's views. I actually disagree with some of the secular groups denying his freedom of movement, which doesn't seem to have any rational basis.
The secular groups aren't saying he can't come to Britain, they're saying the tax payer shouldn't pay for it.

Why? Because his place of work is loaded? Were the secular groups complaining with the wealthy author Salman Rushdie had tax funded protection for his freedoms?
Salman Rushdie is British citizen who had fatwā issued aginst is life, it's not even close to a comparison.
Well I agree, but there isn't a case for either men's freedom to be compromised, and the law and government should protect that freedom by applying universal rules, rules apply to everyone, regardless of whether or not you happen to disagree with them , which is really what this whole shebang is about.
What freedoms? No one is saying that the pope can't come here.
RuleBritannia © MMXI

User avatar
colubridae
Custom Rank: Rank
Posts: 2771
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 12:16 pm
About me: http://www.essentialart.com/acatalog/Ed ... Stars.html
Location: Birmingham art gallery
Contact:

Re: The UK election thread

Post by colubridae » Thu Apr 22, 2010 9:27 pm

Wasted Tourist wrote:
RuleBritannia wrote:
Wasted Tourist wrote:
RuleBritannia wrote:
Wasted Tourist wrote:Brown steamrollered this debate, Cameron looked like he wanted to throw in the towel at the end.

Cameron used the Pope question to suck up to religious types, while the other two were unequivocal in their opposition to the Pope's views. I actually disagree with some of the secular groups denying his freedom of movement, which doesn't seem to have any rational basis.
The secular groups aren't saying he can't come to Britain, they're saying the tax payer shouldn't pay for it.

Why? Because his place of work is loaded? Were the secular groups complaining with the wealthy author Salman Rushdie had tax funded protection for his freedoms?
Salman Rushdie is British citizen who had fatwā issued aginst is life, it's not even close to a comparison.
Well I agree, but there isn't a case for either men's freedom to be compromised, and the law and government should protect that freedom by applying universal rules, rules apply to everyone, regardless of whether or not you happen to disagree with them , which is really what this whole shebang is about.
Yeah especially the freedom to bugger altar boys and then have your crime covered up.

You seem to be forgetting that's what pope rat-shit was doing.
I have a well balanced personality. I've got chips on both shoulders

User avatar
Deep Sea Isopod
Bathynomus giganteus
Posts: 7806
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 1:09 am
Location: Gods blind spot.
Contact:

Re: The UK election thread

Post by Deep Sea Isopod » Fri Apr 23, 2010 7:38 am

I wonder if the Vatican will pay for me to go and visit there?
I run with scissors. It makes me feel dangerous Image

Image

User avatar
RuleBritannia
Cupid is a cunt!
Posts: 1630
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 9:55 pm
About me: About you
Location: The Machine
Contact:

Re: The UK election thread

Post by RuleBritannia » Sat Apr 24, 2010 4:15 pm

If you want to know the election results but don't want to watch the boring news channels, you can watch Channel 4's Alternate Election Night.
RuleBritannia © MMXI

User avatar
Pappa
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Posts: 56488
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
Contact:

Re: The UK election thread

Post by Pappa » Mon Apr 26, 2010 9:33 am

On Newsnight - Gordon Brown makes his opinion on David Cameron clear.
Trigger Warning!!!1! :
Image
For information on ways to help support Rationalia financially, see our funding page.


When the aliens do come, everything we once thought was cool will then make us ashamed.

PsychoSerenity
"I" Self-Perceive Recursively
Posts: 7824
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:57 am
Contact:

Re: The UK election thread

Post by PsychoSerenity » Mon Apr 26, 2010 6:03 pm

Just seen a party election broadcast from the BNP. :|~

Mind you I do agree with them about bringing our troops back, though I suspect for different reasons.
[Disclaimer - if this is comes across like I think I know what I'm talking about, I want to make it clear that I don't. I'm just trying to get my thoughts down]

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests