Paco wrote:Troll wrote:Come on Atheists, let's see how stupid you really are.
Dickheads!!!
I've never given a warning before
That's an ad hom my friend and as such this is a warning.
Refrain from making personal insults towards the members of this forum or you will be given a suspension.
I really want to use that ban hammer for the first time so feel free to slip up again.
It's not an ad hominem argument, it's just an insult. Mixing up those terms makes people (in this case the people on this forum, us) look stupid, and with "stupid" I mean "like the Rational Response Squad".
I happen to agree with the opening post. Most atheists (at least the ones you hear about) are stupid. This includes professor Dawkins. I don't mean to say he's unintelligent. He's most certainly intelligent, but I think he and other atheist activists are misguided, and doing more harm then good.
Many atheist academics feel the need to venture outside of their field, and the results are mixed at best. Professor Dawkins mght be an excellent biologist, but he's a pretty poor philosopher. Evolutionary theory doesn't disprove the existence of gods, it just shows the invalidity of Paley's design argument. Dawkins' reasons for rejecting the concept of non-overlapping magisteria are nothing more then silly. It's sloppy thinking, and I don't want to be associated with it.
Meanwhile, the really stupid atheists like the RRS or New York City Atheists are trying to tell other atheists what they should think, how they should behave and what constitutes a good atheist. Brights are coming up with one ridiculous idea after another (debaptism, secular naming ceremonies, wtf?), atheist activists are spending money putting adds on busses and noone bothers to look at what's keeping religion in place.
I can understand why people think atheists are stupid. All of those you hear from are.