GW alarmists passages still blocked.

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: GW alarmists passages still blocked.

Post by Hermit » Tue Sep 23, 2014 2:44 pm

Neither can I, but it does provide a bigger picture. I think the pattern you can see there is more significant than any climate change we have recorded over the past couple of centuries.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

User avatar
Tero
Just saying
Posts: 51246
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
About me: 15-32-25
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: GW alarmists passages still blocked.

Post by Tero » Tue Sep 23, 2014 3:12 pm

Generally, there is lack of comprehension about the x axis in climate talks. But that's not the question I asked you/mm.

What is the warming factor on the 10-12 thousand year scale?

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: GW alarmists passages still blocked.

Post by Hermit » Tue Sep 23, 2014 3:23 pm

Tero, your question was "in your own words, list the one most important factor to warming, whether man made or natural" I gave you my answer: Milankovitch cycles. The way you phrased the comment about the 10,000 year time span made it seem optional, but even if it wasn't, that's my answer.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

User avatar
Tero
Just saying
Posts: 51246
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
About me: 15-32-25
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: GW alarmists passages still blocked.

Post by Tero » Tue Sep 23, 2014 3:36 pm

Wrong answer. And go back to thousands, not 20-40 thousand years.

The reason is that there is a problem with 100 000 years
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/100,000-year_problem

And I'm no expert on that.

User avatar
Tero
Just saying
Posts: 51246
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
About me: 15-32-25
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: GW alarmists passages still blocked.

Post by Tero » Tue Sep 23, 2014 4:08 pm

I'm completely happy with this
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 ... 134127.htm

ice ages, 100 000 cycles, have been studied and explained. And it's slow and it will be measurable for the cycle we are in.

This is NOT what we are experienceing this century, this millennium. But there is a simple explanation for the 12 000 year graph I linked.

User avatar
mistermack
Posts: 15093
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
About me: Never rong.
Contact:

Re: GW alarmists passages still blocked.

Post by mistermack » Tue Sep 23, 2014 4:26 pm

Tero wrote:MM, in your own words, list the one most important factor to warming, whether man made or natural. (There is an answer.)

We can limit this to the last 10 000 years for simplicity.
It's the sun, you dozy sod.
Have you not noticed how it gets cold at night?
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.

User avatar
Tero
Just saying
Posts: 51246
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
About me: 15-32-25
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: GW alarmists passages still blocked.

Post by Tero » Tue Sep 23, 2014 4:29 pm

Wrong answer. You failed middle school science. D- for you. The sun is merely the source of all warmth.

Nothing corelates to temperature as well as CO2 for 400 000 years. And even better for the last 10 000 years.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_age#me ... t_data.svg

First graph if you are on mobile version.

User avatar
mistermack
Posts: 15093
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
About me: Never rong.
Contact:

Re: GW alarmists passages still blocked.

Post by mistermack » Tue Sep 23, 2014 4:45 pm

Tero wrote: list the one most important factor to warming
Tero wrote: The sun is merely the source of all warmth.
Sometimes I despair of you !!

And how the hell can you not know by now, that historical CO2 levels FOLLOW temperature, rather than lead it?
In other words, CO2 rises and falls with ocean temperatures, quite naturally, because the ocean holds more in solution more when it's cold?
Or did you forget?
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: GW alarmists passages still blocked.

Post by Hermit » Tue Sep 23, 2014 4:54 pm

Well, I'll be buggered. From the link you posted, Tero, it looks like although the difference between glacial and interglacial temperatures keeps increasing, the planet has been cooling down over the past 5 million years. I never knew that until a few minutes ago.

Image
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

User avatar
Tero
Just saying
Posts: 51246
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
About me: 15-32-25
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: GW alarmists passages still blocked.

Post by Tero » Tue Sep 23, 2014 5:25 pm

mistermack wrote:
Tero wrote: list the one most important factor to warming
Tero wrote: The sun is merely the source of all warmth.
Sometimes I despair of you !!

And how the hell can you not know by now, that historical CO2 levels FOLLOW temperature, rather than lead it?
In other words, CO2 rises and falls with ocean temperatures, quite naturally, because the ocean holds more in solution more when it's cold?
Or did you forget?
At least we are getting somewhere. CO2 is associated with warming. You admit that much.

No, it does not follow warming. It IS the warming. This was not clear 10 years ago. The ice core data was redone.

http://news.ku.dk/all_news/2012/2012.7/ ... s_and_co2/

other thatn the years we people have been messing with carbon, the few hundred year lag is basically nothing. It is concurrent. There is math to explain it but you have to go to skepticalscience.com. The feedback requires a short lag.

The point you are missing is that there is no other way to trap sun heat than by greenhouse gas. Tilts etc are minor changes.

User avatar
Tero
Just saying
Posts: 51246
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
About me: 15-32-25
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: GW alarmists passages still blocked.

Post by Tero » Tue Sep 23, 2014 6:06 pm

The surface of the planet, a dark object, can warm up whether there is an atmosphere or not. We are talking about the sun and the atmosphere above.

Another paper:
The mean and 1σ of the histograms are given. CO2 concentration leads the global temperature stack in 90% of the simulations and lags it in 6%.
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v4 ... 10915.html

User avatar
klr
(%gibber(who=klr, what=Leprageek);)
Posts: 32964
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 1:25 pm
About me: The money was just resting in my account.
Location: Airstrip Two
Contact:

Re: GW alarmists passages still blocked.

Post by klr » Tue Sep 23, 2014 11:06 pm

Whoa! This is not the the time or the place for hard science. It's a thread thread on climate change denial after all. :prof:
God has no place within these walls, just like facts have no place within organized religion. - Superintendent Chalmers

It's not up to us to choose which laws we want to obey. If it were, I'd kill everyone who looked at me cock-eyed! - Rex Banner

The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression. - Gary Larson

:mob: :comp: :mob:

User avatar
macdoc
Twitcher
Posts: 9007
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:20 pm
Location: BirdWing Home FNQ
Contact:

Re: GW alarmists passages still blocked.

Post by macdoc » Tue Sep 23, 2014 11:26 pm

:levi: :levi: :levi: :levi: floating themselves into another universe where the smoke is pink and smells of candy floss. :shiver: :roll:
Resident in Cairns Australia • Current ride> 2014 Honda CB500F • Travel photos https://500px.com/p/macdoc?view=galleries

User avatar
Tero
Just saying
Posts: 51246
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
About me: 15-32-25
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: GW alarmists passages still blocked.

Post by Tero » Tue Sep 23, 2014 11:28 pm

"Warming is caused by the sun's rays. Warming is good. I like to stand in the sun. I hate shoveling snow."

Is that better, klr?

User avatar
macdoc
Twitcher
Posts: 9007
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:20 pm
Location: BirdWing Home FNQ
Contact:

Re: GW alarmists passages still blocked.

Post by macdoc » Wed Sep 24, 2014 7:43 am

Image

warming is caused by over enthusiastic hugging of fuzzy bears.... :coffee:
Resident in Cairns Australia • Current ride> 2014 Honda CB500F • Travel photos https://500px.com/p/macdoc?view=galleries

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests