I'm at a loss as I don't know who you are so if you would kindly give me examples of my stupidity which isn't obviously joking, well that would be nice. Thanks.aspire1670 wrote:
Never mind, Dave, if you really knuckle down and study hard, I'm sure you'll catch up eventually.
Rationalskepiticism,lol.
- DaveDodo007
- Posts: 2975
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
- About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
- Contact:
Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.
- DaveDodo007
- Posts: 2975
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
- About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
- Contact:
Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.
What did I say that wasn't sensible or I'm I wrong by fiat?Hermit wrote:Troll work? I don't think he is trolling at all.Fallible wrote:Thanks. Coo, yeah, gets suspended for a month, comes back, lasts two days before getting suspended again. Yeah, that's some genius troll work. All that had passed me by, it occurred during my self-imposed holiday from the board.Scott1328 wrote:http://www.rationalskepticism.org/gener ... ilit=MGTOWFallible wrote:Sorry, I can't brain good today. Which thread?
Neither Scot Duchy's nor DaveDodo's opinions are particularly sensible to put it mildly, but being given warnings for them is just more demonstration for me that ratskep is run by a bunch of out of control prefects with swagger sticks. Even if I did agree with some of the weirder aspects of the increasingly Byzantine forum rules, the arbitrary interpretation and selective application of them stinks to high heaven. To me that forum reminds me of Golding's novel Lord of the Flies, but with this difference: Here the good guys are kicking the shit out of the arseholes any which way they can.
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.
- Fallible
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 10:59 pm
- About me: pronoun; the objective case of I, used as a direct or indirect object.
- Location: Scouseland
- Contact:
Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.
Sorry, what? Who is a middle aged man and what wonderful city am I supposed to have been born in?DaveDodo007 wrote:Yeah I'm a middle aged man and so I'm going to troll a nerd site.Fallible wrote:Was there a joke in there then? Just looked like a teenager bragging about how totes amay they are on the internet from here.DaveDodo007 wrote:Jesus fucking Christ, get a sense of humour and take the stick out of your arse for once. Are you the hall monitor for ratskep or something.Scott1328 wrote:Oh good. now there is proof that your intent at RatSkep is merely to troll. That should make it easier to make your ban permanent.How did you manage to be born in such a wonderful city and still be a knob.
Don't be afraid of what they'll say.
Who cares what cowards think anyway?
They will understand one day,
One day. - Yann Tiersen

Who cares what cowards think anyway?
They will understand one day,
One day. - Yann Tiersen

- Fallible
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 10:59 pm
- About me: pronoun; the objective case of I, used as a direct or indirect object.
- Location: Scouseland
- Contact:
Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.
You do get awful het up about internet fora, don't you. Calm down, dear.DaveDodo007 wrote:Is humour (even shite humour) no longer allowed by ratskeptions. This thread was to take the piss out of you ratskep joyless, ideologues, anti-free speech tossers, self important retarded wankstains and here you are sucking all the oxygen out of the thread. You are all a bunch of circle jerking, echo chamber, yes people. Rationalia will outlast ratscum by a country mile because the people you try to silence will just go somewhere else and mock you. Oh and fuck off.
Don't be afraid of what they'll say.
Who cares what cowards think anyway?
They will understand one day,
One day. - Yann Tiersen

Who cares what cowards think anyway?
They will understand one day,
One day. - Yann Tiersen

- DaveDodo007
- Posts: 2975
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
- About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
- Contact:
Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.
Erm the whole 'I'm a middle aged man' part of my post, is reading comprehension too much for you. You might want to check out your location, sheesh you are dumb, perfect for ratskep though so carry on.Fallible wrote:Sorry, what? Who is a middle aged man and what wonderful city am I supposed to have been born in?DaveDodo007 wrote:Yeah I'm a middle aged man and so I'm going to troll a nerd site.Fallible wrote:Was there a joke in there then? Just looked like a teenager bragging about how totes amay they are on the internet from here.DaveDodo007 wrote:Jesus fucking Christ, get a sense of humour and take the stick out of your arse for once. Are you the hall monitor for ratskep or something.Scott1328 wrote:Oh good. now there is proof that your intent at RatSkep is merely to troll. That should make it easier to make your ban permanent.How did you manage to be born in such a wonderful city and still be a knob.
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.
- DaveDodo007
- Posts: 2975
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
- About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
- Contact:
Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.
I find stupidity and censorship annoying and cowardly, what a twat I am.Fallible wrote:You do get awful het up about internet fora, don't you. Calm down, dear.DaveDodo007 wrote:Is humour (even shite humour) no longer allowed by ratskeptions. This thread was to take the piss out of you ratskep joyless, ideologues, anti-free speech tossers, self important retarded wankstains and here you are sucking all the oxygen out of the thread. You are all a bunch of circle jerking, echo chamber, yes people. Rationalia will outlast ratscum by a country mile because the people you try to silence will just go somewhere else and mock you. Oh and fuck off.

We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.
- Fallible
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 10:59 pm
- About me: pronoun; the objective case of I, used as a direct or indirect object.
- Location: Scouseland
- Contact:
Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.
Oh is that what you did?DaveDodo007 wrote:They still are and as feisty as ever, the woman at Rationalia are on a different astral plane; I have been torn a new one in arguments with both Bella and Rachel but all you get at ratskep is reported for hurt fee fees when I show them up to be dipshites and make them embarrassed for their stupid opinions.rEvolutionist wrote:The greatest women were here, until they all deserted the place. Now there's just a bunch of crusty old dudes here.

Don't be afraid of what they'll say.
Who cares what cowards think anyway?
They will understand one day,
One day. - Yann Tiersen

Who cares what cowards think anyway?
They will understand one day,
One day. - Yann Tiersen

- Fallible
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 10:59 pm
- About me: pronoun; the objective case of I, used as a direct or indirect object.
- Location: Scouseland
- Contact:
Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.
Nope, but apparently putting together a coherent sentence is too much for you. The fuck are you babbling about?DaveDodo007 wrote:Erm the whole 'I'm a middle aged man' part of my post, is reading comprehension too much for you.
Ah, I see the problem. You fill in gaps in your knowledge with what you think is correct rather than bothering to find out. That's how someone makes a twat of themselves, Dave. You actually think I don't know what it says next to "location" and are therefore pointing towards it as an answer to my question. I do know, Dave, I put it there. Now have another guess at why I asked my question. Hope that helps.You might want to check out your location, sheesh you are dumb, perfect for ratskep though so carry on.
Don't be afraid of what they'll say.
Who cares what cowards think anyway?
They will understand one day,
One day. - Yann Tiersen

Who cares what cowards think anyway?
They will understand one day,
One day. - Yann Tiersen

- Fallible
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 10:59 pm
- About me: pronoun; the objective case of I, used as a direct or indirect object.
- Location: Scouseland
- Contact:
Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.
You find stupidity annoying?DaveDodo007 wrote:I find stupidity and censorship annoying and cowardly, what a twat I am.Fallible wrote:You do get awful het up about internet fora, don't you. Calm down, dear.DaveDodo007 wrote:Is humour (even shite humour) no longer allowed by ratskeptions. This thread was to take the piss out of you ratskep joyless, ideologues, anti-free speech tossers, self important retarded wankstains and here you are sucking all the oxygen out of the thread. You are all a bunch of circle jerking, echo chamber, yes people. Rationalia will outlast ratscum by a country mile because the people you try to silence will just go somewhere else and mock you. Oh and fuck off.

Don't be afraid of what they'll say.
Who cares what cowards think anyway?
They will understand one day,
One day. - Yann Tiersen

Who cares what cowards think anyway?
They will understand one day,
One day. - Yann Tiersen

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.
FYI: Mai was not banned at Atheism Plus. she flounced, from there just as she flounced from here and from RatSkep, in fact she friended me on Facebook just so that she could asked me to clear that up over on RatSkep when the topic of the circumstances surrounding A+ came up on RatSkep.DaveDodo007 wrote:
I think that is the nearest I would ever come to understand the whole trigger warning stuff, it is like an old memory suddenly surfaced and she lost it. She just seemed to be the typical ratz member then when the A+ stuff come out she totally changed. I never met her in real life just on here, she ended up being banned from the A+ forums (quelle surprise.) I personally hope she comes back here, she will get as much support as an online community can give, which unfortunately isn't very much. She will find us welcoming and not so rabid as we make out (our bark is worse then our bite aka we don't bite.)
Apparently she must still lurk there and perhaps even here.
I de-friended her shortly thereafter. I am not really into her brand of activism.
- Fallible
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 10:59 pm
- About me: pronoun; the objective case of I, used as a direct or indirect object.
- Location: Scouseland
- Contact:
Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.
"And I'm gonna cwy and cwy and cwy about those nasty peoples and tew fibs about what hapened and call them names cos I'm still all cwoss years later!!"Seth wrote:Yeah, I agree. If you defend an unpopular position vigorously and refuse to concede "defeat" merely because others think they have "won" the debate. Then they get upset if you don't accept their specious logic and self-serving and irrational arguments, and when you challenge their preconceptions and their ideology with logical arguments that they don't happen to agree with.Hermit wrote:Troll work? I don't think he is trolling at all.Fallible wrote:Thanks. Coo, yeah, gets suspended for a month, comes back, lasts two days before getting suspended again. Yeah, that's some genius troll work. All that had passed me by, it occurred during my self-imposed holiday from the board.Scott1328 wrote:http://www.rationalskepticism.org/gener ... ilit=MGTOWFallible wrote:Sorry, I can't brain good today. Which thread?
Neither Scot Duchy's nor DaveDodo's opinions are particularly sensible to put it mildly, but being given warnings for them is just more demonstration for me that ratskep is run by a bunch of out of control prefects with swagger sticks. Even if I did agree with some of the weirder aspects of the increasingly Byzantine forum rules, the arbitrary interpretation and selective application of them stinks to high heaven. To me that forum reminds me of Golding's novel Lord of the Flies, but with this difference: Here the good guys are kicking the shit out of the arseholes any which way they can.
That's what happened to me. I wouldn't toe the party line and roll over which pissed people off so they had to call me a "troll" to get rid of me even though I wasn't trolling, I was just defending my position.
Buncha pseudo-intellectual pussies over there.

Don't be afraid of what they'll say.
Who cares what cowards think anyway?
They will understand one day,
One day. - Yann Tiersen

Who cares what cowards think anyway?
They will understand one day,
One day. - Yann Tiersen

- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 41035
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.


Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
- DaveDodo007
- Posts: 2975
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
- About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
- Contact:
Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.
You are wasting your time Seth as the liberals are right by fiat and anybody who disagrees with them is wrong 'just because.' They are even trying to over rule science because some finding hurt their feeling, lol. Feminist biology, feminist physics, post modernism. It is basically Lysenkoism, in other words feminist/culture marxism reality. They got away with it through shaming tactics as nobody wanted to be called racist or sexist but when you use the words so liberally they lose their power to sting. Without words (having power) then the progressives and feminist have no power because they never actually do anything, they just whine and cry and demand someone else do something. It just needs everyone else to stand up to the feminist and progressives and tell them to fuck off and we don't care about their name and shame calling. They jumped the shark long ago and all anybody has to do is just laugh at the pathetic bastards.Seth wrote: Yeah, I agree. If you defend an unpopular position vigorously and refuse to concede "defeat" merely because others think they have "won" the debate. Then they get upset if you don't accept their specious logic and self-serving and irrational arguments, and when you challenge their preconceptions and their ideology with logical arguments that they don't happen to agree with.
That's what happened to me. I wouldn't toe the party line and roll over which pissed people off so they had to call me a "troll" to get rid of me even though I wasn't trolling, I was just defending my position.
Buncha pseudo-intellectual pussies over there.



We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.
- Fallible
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 10:59 pm
- About me: pronoun; the objective case of I, used as a direct or indirect object.
- Location: Scouseland
- Contact:
Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Don't be afraid of what they'll say.
Who cares what cowards think anyway?
They will understand one day,
One day. - Yann Tiersen

Who cares what cowards think anyway?
They will understand one day,
One day. - Yann Tiersen

- DaveDodo007
- Posts: 2975
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
- About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
- Contact:
Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.
Still proving how stupid you are I see. I have never claimed to be an intellectual giant and even a cursory glance at my posts will show you that I think am a retard. I'm just amazed by how many people are even more retarded than me and have to resort to censorship and banning to even maintain that they have any intelligence or integrity. Still carry on being a pathetic sheep you intellect you.Fallible wrote:Oh is that what you did?DaveDodo007 wrote:They still are and as feisty as ever, the woman at Rationalia are on a different astral plane; I have been torn a new one in arguments with both Bella and Rachel but all you get at ratskep is reported for hurt fee fees when I show them up to be dipshites and make them embarrassed for their stupid opinions.rEvolutionist wrote:The greatest women were here, until they all deserted the place. Now there's just a bunch of crusty old dudes here.Looks to me like you couldn't manage to insult people by flying under the radar (that takes skill) and just went crashing through every sensor until you finally got yourself suspended for six months. Say what you like about people at ratskep, most of them can rustle up the brains required to manage to avoid being kicked off for half a year. If you were the intellectual giant you think you are you wouldn't be here now, fapping out your impotent rage at people who've probably forgotten you ever existed.

We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests