Rationalskepiticism,lol.

A forum to talk about other sites and things you've found in the jungle that is the internet.

Please take a moment to read the rationalia guidelines: http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3449
Locked
User avatar
DaveDodo007
Posts: 2975
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by DaveDodo007 » Sat May 10, 2014 10:34 pm

aspire1670 wrote:
Never mind, Dave, if you really knuckle down and study hard, I'm sure you'll catch up eventually.
I'm at a loss as I don't know who you are so if you would kindly give me examples of my stupidity which isn't obviously joking, well that would be nice. Thanks.
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.

User avatar
DaveDodo007
Posts: 2975
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by DaveDodo007 » Sat May 10, 2014 10:50 pm

Hermit wrote:
Fallible wrote:
Scott1328 wrote:
Fallible wrote:Sorry, I can't brain good today. Which thread?
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/gener ... ilit=MGTOW
Thanks. Coo, yeah, gets suspended for a month, comes back, lasts two days before getting suspended again. Yeah, that's some genius troll work. All that had passed me by, it occurred during my self-imposed holiday from the board.
Troll work? I don't think he is trolling at all.

Neither Scot Duchy's nor DaveDodo's opinions are particularly sensible to put it mildly, but being given warnings for them is just more demonstration for me that ratskep is run by a bunch of out of control prefects with swagger sticks. Even if I did agree with some of the weirder aspects of the increasingly Byzantine forum rules, the arbitrary interpretation and selective application of them stinks to high heaven. To me that forum reminds me of Golding's novel Lord of the Flies, but with this difference: Here the good guys are kicking the shit out of the arseholes any which way they can.
What did I say that wasn't sensible or I'm I wrong by fiat?
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.

User avatar
Fallible
Posts: 336
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 10:59 pm
About me: pronoun; the objective case of I, used as a direct or indirect object.
Location: Scouseland
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by Fallible » Sat May 10, 2014 10:54 pm

DaveDodo007 wrote:
Fallible wrote:
DaveDodo007 wrote:
Scott1328 wrote:Oh good. now there is proof that your intent at RatSkep is merely to troll. That should make it easier to make your ban permanent.
Jesus fucking Christ, get a sense of humour and take the stick out of your arse for once. Are you the hall monitor for ratskep or something. :roll:
Was there a joke in there then? Just looked like a teenager bragging about how totes amay they are on the internet from here.
Yeah I'm a middle aged man and so I'm going to troll a nerd site. :roll: How did you manage to be born in such a wonderful city and still be a knob. :dunno:
Sorry, what? Who is a middle aged man and what wonderful city am I supposed to have been born in?
Don't be afraid of what they'll say.
Who cares what cowards think anyway?
They will understand one day,
One day.
- Yann Tiersen

Image

User avatar
Fallible
Posts: 336
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 10:59 pm
About me: pronoun; the objective case of I, used as a direct or indirect object.
Location: Scouseland
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by Fallible » Sat May 10, 2014 10:56 pm

DaveDodo007 wrote:Is humour (even shite humour) no longer allowed by ratskeptions. This thread was to take the piss out of you ratskep joyless, ideologues, anti-free speech tossers, self important retarded wankstains and here you are sucking all the oxygen out of the thread. You are all a bunch of circle jerking, echo chamber, yes people. Rationalia will outlast ratscum by a country mile because the people you try to silence will just go somewhere else and mock you. Oh and fuck off. :dance:
You do get awful het up about internet fora, don't you. Calm down, dear.
Don't be afraid of what they'll say.
Who cares what cowards think anyway?
They will understand one day,
One day.
- Yann Tiersen

Image

User avatar
DaveDodo007
Posts: 2975
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by DaveDodo007 » Sat May 10, 2014 10:59 pm

Fallible wrote:
DaveDodo007 wrote:
Fallible wrote:
DaveDodo007 wrote:
Scott1328 wrote:Oh good. now there is proof that your intent at RatSkep is merely to troll. That should make it easier to make your ban permanent.
Jesus fucking Christ, get a sense of humour and take the stick out of your arse for once. Are you the hall monitor for ratskep or something. :roll:
Was there a joke in there then? Just looked like a teenager bragging about how totes amay they are on the internet from here.
Yeah I'm a middle aged man and so I'm going to troll a nerd site. :roll: How did you manage to be born in such a wonderful city and still be a knob. :dunno:
Sorry, what? Who is a middle aged man and what wonderful city am I supposed to have been born in?
Erm the whole 'I'm a middle aged man' part of my post, is reading comprehension too much for you. You might want to check out your location, sheesh you are dumb, perfect for ratskep though so carry on.
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.

User avatar
DaveDodo007
Posts: 2975
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by DaveDodo007 » Sat May 10, 2014 11:02 pm

Fallible wrote:
DaveDodo007 wrote:Is humour (even shite humour) no longer allowed by ratskeptions. This thread was to take the piss out of you ratskep joyless, ideologues, anti-free speech tossers, self important retarded wankstains and here you are sucking all the oxygen out of the thread. You are all a bunch of circle jerking, echo chamber, yes people. Rationalia will outlast ratscum by a country mile because the people you try to silence will just go somewhere else and mock you. Oh and fuck off. :dance:
You do get awful het up about internet fora, don't you. Calm down, dear.
I find stupidity and censorship annoying and cowardly, what a twat I am. :roll:
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.

User avatar
Fallible
Posts: 336
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 10:59 pm
About me: pronoun; the objective case of I, used as a direct or indirect object.
Location: Scouseland
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by Fallible » Sat May 10, 2014 11:04 pm

DaveDodo007 wrote:
rEvolutionist wrote:The greatest women were here, until they all deserted the place. Now there's just a bunch of crusty old dudes here.
They still are and as feisty as ever, the woman at Rationalia are on a different astral plane; I have been torn a new one in arguments with both Bella and Rachel but all you get at ratskep is reported for hurt fee fees when I show them up to be dipshites and make them embarrassed for their stupid opinions.
Oh is that what you did? :lol: Looks to me like you couldn't manage to insult people by flying under the radar (that takes skill) and just went crashing through every sensor until you finally got yourself suspended for six months. Say what you like about people at ratskep, most of them can rustle up the brains required to manage to avoid being kicked off for half a year. If you were the intellectual giant you think you are you wouldn't be here now, fapping out your impotent rage at people who've probably forgotten you ever existed.
Don't be afraid of what they'll say.
Who cares what cowards think anyway?
They will understand one day,
One day.
- Yann Tiersen

Image

User avatar
Fallible
Posts: 336
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 10:59 pm
About me: pronoun; the objective case of I, used as a direct or indirect object.
Location: Scouseland
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by Fallible » Sat May 10, 2014 11:10 pm

DaveDodo007 wrote:Erm the whole 'I'm a middle aged man' part of my post, is reading comprehension too much for you.
Nope, but apparently putting together a coherent sentence is too much for you. The fuck are you babbling about?
You might want to check out your location, sheesh you are dumb, perfect for ratskep though so carry on.
Ah, I see the problem. You fill in gaps in your knowledge with what you think is correct rather than bothering to find out. That's how someone makes a twat of themselves, Dave. You actually think I don't know what it says next to "location" and are therefore pointing towards it as an answer to my question. I do know, Dave, I put it there. Now have another guess at why I asked my question. Hope that helps.
Don't be afraid of what they'll say.
Who cares what cowards think anyway?
They will understand one day,
One day.
- Yann Tiersen

Image

User avatar
Fallible
Posts: 336
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 10:59 pm
About me: pronoun; the objective case of I, used as a direct or indirect object.
Location: Scouseland
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by Fallible » Sat May 10, 2014 11:12 pm

DaveDodo007 wrote:
Fallible wrote:
DaveDodo007 wrote:Is humour (even shite humour) no longer allowed by ratskeptions. This thread was to take the piss out of you ratskep joyless, ideologues, anti-free speech tossers, self important retarded wankstains and here you are sucking all the oxygen out of the thread. You are all a bunch of circle jerking, echo chamber, yes people. Rationalia will outlast ratscum by a country mile because the people you try to silence will just go somewhere else and mock you. Oh and fuck off. :dance:
You do get awful het up about internet fora, don't you. Calm down, dear.
I find stupidity and censorship annoying and cowardly, what a twat I am. :roll:
You find stupidity annoying? :hehe:
Don't be afraid of what they'll say.
Who cares what cowards think anyway?
They will understand one day,
One day.
- Yann Tiersen

Image

User avatar
Scott1328
Posts: 1140
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 4:34 am
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by Scott1328 » Sat May 10, 2014 11:15 pm

DaveDodo007 wrote:
I think that is the nearest I would ever come to understand the whole trigger warning stuff, it is like an old memory suddenly surfaced and she lost it. She just seemed to be the typical ratz member then when the A+ stuff come out she totally changed. I never met her in real life just on here, she ended up being banned from the A+ forums (quelle surprise.) I personally hope she comes back here, she will get as much support as an online community can give, which unfortunately isn't very much. She will find us welcoming and not so rabid as we make out (our bark is worse then our bite aka we don't bite.)
FYI: Mai was not banned at Atheism Plus. she flounced, from there just as she flounced from here and from RatSkep, in fact she friended me on Facebook just so that she could asked me to clear that up over on RatSkep when the topic of the circumstances surrounding A+ came up on RatSkep.

Apparently she must still lurk there and perhaps even here.

I de-friended her shortly thereafter. I am not really into her brand of activism.

User avatar
Fallible
Posts: 336
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 10:59 pm
About me: pronoun; the objective case of I, used as a direct or indirect object.
Location: Scouseland
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by Fallible » Sat May 10, 2014 11:17 pm

Seth wrote:
Hermit wrote:
Fallible wrote:
Scott1328 wrote:
Fallible wrote:Sorry, I can't brain good today. Which thread?
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/gener ... ilit=MGTOW
Thanks. Coo, yeah, gets suspended for a month, comes back, lasts two days before getting suspended again. Yeah, that's some genius troll work. All that had passed me by, it occurred during my self-imposed holiday from the board.
Troll work? I don't think he is trolling at all.

Neither Scot Duchy's nor DaveDodo's opinions are particularly sensible to put it mildly, but being given warnings for them is just more demonstration for me that ratskep is run by a bunch of out of control prefects with swagger sticks. Even if I did agree with some of the weirder aspects of the increasingly Byzantine forum rules, the arbitrary interpretation and selective application of them stinks to high heaven. To me that forum reminds me of Golding's novel Lord of the Flies, but with this difference: Here the good guys are kicking the shit out of the arseholes any which way they can.
Yeah, I agree. If you defend an unpopular position vigorously and refuse to concede "defeat" merely because others think they have "won" the debate. Then they get upset if you don't accept their specious logic and self-serving and irrational arguments, and when you challenge their preconceptions and their ideology with logical arguments that they don't happen to agree with.

That's what happened to me. I wouldn't toe the party line and roll over which pissed people off so they had to call me a "troll" to get rid of me even though I wasn't trolling, I was just defending my position.

Buncha pseudo-intellectual pussies over there.
"And I'm gonna cwy and cwy and cwy about those nasty peoples and tew fibs about what hapened and call them names cos I'm still all cwoss years later!!" :grr:
Don't be afraid of what they'll say.
Who cares what cowards think anyway?
They will understand one day,
One day.
- Yann Tiersen

Image

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41035
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by Svartalf » Sat May 10, 2014 11:26 pm

:hehe:


:pop:
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
DaveDodo007
Posts: 2975
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by DaveDodo007 » Sat May 10, 2014 11:27 pm

Seth wrote: Yeah, I agree. If you defend an unpopular position vigorously and refuse to concede "defeat" merely because others think they have "won" the debate. Then they get upset if you don't accept their specious logic and self-serving and irrational arguments, and when you challenge their preconceptions and their ideology with logical arguments that they don't happen to agree with.

That's what happened to me. I wouldn't toe the party line and roll over which pissed people off so they had to call me a "troll" to get rid of me even though I wasn't trolling, I was just defending my position.

Buncha pseudo-intellectual pussies over there.
You are wasting your time Seth as the liberals are right by fiat and anybody who disagrees with them is wrong 'just because.' They are even trying to over rule science because some finding hurt their feeling, lol. Feminist biology, feminist physics, post modernism. It is basically Lysenkoism, in other words feminist/culture marxism reality. They got away with it through shaming tactics as nobody wanted to be called racist or sexist but when you use the words so liberally they lose their power to sting. Without words (having power) then the progressives and feminist have no power because they never actually do anything, they just whine and cry and demand someone else do something. It just needs everyone else to stand up to the feminist and progressives and tell them to fuck off and we don't care about their name and shame calling. They jumped the shark long ago and all anybody has to do is just laugh at the pathetic bastards. :dance: :dance: :dance:
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.

User avatar
Fallible
Posts: 336
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 10:59 pm
About me: pronoun; the objective case of I, used as a direct or indirect object.
Location: Scouseland
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by Fallible » Sat May 10, 2014 11:30 pm

:blah:
Don't be afraid of what they'll say.
Who cares what cowards think anyway?
They will understand one day,
One day.
- Yann Tiersen

Image

User avatar
DaveDodo007
Posts: 2975
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by DaveDodo007 » Sat May 10, 2014 11:40 pm

Fallible wrote:
DaveDodo007 wrote:
rEvolutionist wrote:The greatest women were here, until they all deserted the place. Now there's just a bunch of crusty old dudes here.
They still are and as feisty as ever, the woman at Rationalia are on a different astral plane; I have been torn a new one in arguments with both Bella and Rachel but all you get at ratskep is reported for hurt fee fees when I show them up to be dipshites and make them embarrassed for their stupid opinions.
Oh is that what you did? :lol: Looks to me like you couldn't manage to insult people by flying under the radar (that takes skill) and just went crashing through every sensor until you finally got yourself suspended for six months. Say what you like about people at ratskep, most of them can rustle up the brains required to manage to avoid being kicked off for half a year. If you were the intellectual giant you think you are you wouldn't be here now, fapping out your impotent rage at people who've probably forgotten you ever existed.
Still proving how stupid you are I see. I have never claimed to be an intellectual giant and even a cursory glance at my posts will show you that I think am a retard. I'm just amazed by how many people are even more retarded than me and have to resort to censorship and banning to even maintain that they have any intelligence or integrity. Still carry on being a pathetic sheep you intellect you. :smoke:
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests