You're stupid.Gawdzilla Sama wrote:Mine are always registered. I'm not afraid.Gallstones wrote:Cops are gun nuts?Gawdzilla Sama wrote:Finally something we can agree on.Gallstones wrote:Fucking gun nuts.
You going to register yours, or give them up?
Guns Because
- Gallstones
- Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
- Posts: 8888
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
- About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.
Re: Guns Because
But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010
The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter
The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter
- Blind groper
- Posts: 3997
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
- About me: From New Zealand
- Contact:
Re: Guns Because
I do not believe I have ever said these guys are my heroes. They are simply working men and women. Some are good. Some are bad, even corrupt. Some are certainly heroes, but some are the opposite.Gallstones wrote:
Did you notice that "these people" are your saviors, your heros, Law enforcement--AKA police?
You wish my points were bullshit.
However, I notice you evaded my points, and went straight for the red herring comment.
- Gallstones
- Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
- Posts: 8888
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
- About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.
Re: Guns Because
Hahaha, I love this ad.
Glock 20---Want!
Glock 20---Want!
Last edited by Gallstones on Wed Apr 10, 2013 2:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010
The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter
The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter
- Gallstones
- Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
- Posts: 8888
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
- About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.
Re: Guns Because
Oh fucking please.Blind groper wrote:I do not believe I have ever said these guys are my heroes. They are simply working men and women. Some are good. Some are bad, even corrupt. Some are certainly heroes, but some are the opposite.Gallstones wrote:
Did you notice that "these people" are your saviors, your heros, Law enforcement--AKA police?
You wish my points were bullshit.
However, I notice you evaded my points, and went straight for the red herring comment.
How about you reply to my questions and your own red herring bullshit.
You didn't--see--because you can't.
Can't--AKA can not.
Here's the thing, and both of us know it, there is diddly squat you can do to change things in the US.
And that is a good thing.
So why don't you just take care of your own backyard.
But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010
The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter
The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter
- Blind groper
- Posts: 3997
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
- About me: From New Zealand
- Contact:
Re: Guns Because
Gallstones
I know I can do nothing about the situation in the USA. However, this is a debate. We are discussing things, not changing them. As a member of this forum, I have the same privilege of inclusion in the debate as you have.
I know I can do nothing about the situation in the USA. However, this is a debate. We are discussing things, not changing them. As a member of this forum, I have the same privilege of inclusion in the debate as you have.
For every human action, there is a rationalisation and a reason. Only sometimes do they coincide.
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Guns Because
I chose the laws I wish to ignore carefully. There's nothing wrong with registering my guns, despite the ravings of paranoiac cretins to the contrary.Gallstones wrote:You're stupid.
Re: Guns Because
Not to mention that a .50 BMG has an enormous case capacity - thus far more powder resulting in much higher muzzle velocity.. also the projectile is way bigger. Do your physics. No, not the same at all.Gallstones wrote:Uhm, no. 50 would still be the diameter of the projectile.Svartalf wrote:Izzat different from .50?Gallstones wrote:They're .500's
.44 magnum left, .500 magnum right
Same diameter as a .50bmg
Ouch.
The Browning Machine Gun would have pointed bullets whereas the 500 SW Magnum has semi-wadcutters. Partially jacketed as well.
Unless you meant the .50AE?
- JimC
- The sentimental bloke
- Posts: 74076
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
- About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Guns Because
Criminals and potential terrorists would certainly not register their guns...Gawdzilla Sama wrote:I chose the laws I wish to ignore carefully. There's nothing wrong with registering my guns, despite the ravings of paranoiac cretins to the contrary.Gallstones wrote:You're stupid.

Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!
And my gin!
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Guns Because
Uh, potential terrorists might. Just sayin'.JimC wrote:Criminals and potential terrorists would certainly not register their guns...Gawdzilla Sama wrote:I chose the laws I wish to ignore carefully. There's nothing wrong with registering my guns, despite the ravings of paranoiac cretins to the contrary.Gallstones wrote:You're stupid.

- JimC
- The sentimental bloke
- Posts: 74076
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
- About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Guns Because
Here's an idea - all guns that are registered need to be test fired in a forensic laboratory, and the results carefully tabulated and put into a data base, and the bullets and cartridges kept. That way, a gun later used in a crime can easily be traced back to its owner via the bullets (and sure, it may well have been stolen, but it would still give the police a good starting point)
Law-abiding gun owners would not be inconvenienced by this, it doesn't infringe on their precious "right to bare arms" (just wear a short-sleeved shirt, FFS...)
Law-abiding gun owners would not be inconvenienced by this, it doesn't infringe on their precious "right to bare arms" (just wear a short-sleeved shirt, FFS...)
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!
And my gin!
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Guns Because
Gun-obsessors are terrified of the mythical "slippery slope". "We can't do anything because something bad might eventually happen." MIGHT being the excuse to do nothing, of course.
- Blind groper
- Posts: 3997
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
- About me: From New Zealand
- Contact:
Re: Guns Because
Not a bad idea, Jim, except that ballistics is not that exact. However, I see no reason a system could not be devised to identify bullets individually, and a record made of which bullet was sold to which person. If the political will existed, it could be done. There is that damned word 'if' though.
For every human action, there is a rationalisation and a reason. Only sometimes do they coincide.
Re: Guns Because
Law makers in Canada figured out long ago that it's far easier and more effective to control the supply of ammunition. A gun, looked after, will work for hundreds of years or many, many, thousands of rounds of ammunition, thus once it is in circulation it is hard to remove. Ammunition, however, is harder to traffic and a necessary pairing (with a firearm) for anyone who wishes to shoot something.
So you require a license to buy ammunition. This does not conflict with the precious 2nd amendment as the right to 'bear arms' is not being infringed - the supply of ammunition is being controlled.
So you require a license to buy ammunition. This does not conflict with the precious 2nd amendment as the right to 'bear arms' is not being infringed - the supply of ammunition is being controlled.
- JimC
- The sentimental bloke
- Posts: 74076
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
- About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Guns Because
We have a shooter's licence system (plus the need to register each firearm, and have a lockable storage area). I'm pretty sure you have to show your licence when buying either a gun or ammunition...Făkünamę wrote:Law makers in Canada figured out long ago that it's far easier and more effective to control the supply of ammunition. A gun, looked after, will work for hundreds of years or many, many, thousands of rounds of ammunition, thus once it is in circulation it is hard to remove. Ammunition, however, is harder to traffic and a necessary pairing (with a firearm) for anyone who wishes to shoot something.
So you require a license to buy ammunition. This does not conflict with the precious 2nd amendment as the right to 'bear arms' is not being infringed - the supply of ammunition is being controlled.
And the legal firearms are pretty well restricted to bolt or lever action rifles, and shot guns...
EDIT - Farmers can obtain semi-automatic .22 rifles, and semi-automatic centre fires can be obtained, but you need a special licence, and to get that you have to prove a need...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!
And my gin!
Re: Guns Because
The long gun registration in Canada was abolished a little while ago - it cost us millions and did absolutely nothing. You can buy a gun from anyone* without a license, though you are supposed to do some paper work few people do it. Ammunition is harder to get illegally. That's my point. With millions of guns in circulation in the United States, tighter controls will do little. Besides, controlling ammunition sales sidesteps the 2nd amendment.
*private sale
*private sale
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest