The Hobbit will be Three Films, not Two
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 40990
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: The Hobbit will be Three Films, not Two
OOops... I'll stay with the books for that one, I prefer my imagined characters and scenery.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: The Hobbit will be Three Films, not Two
I was talking about HHGttG here.Gawdzilla Sama wrote:If you want a perfect copy of the book, no. If you want a bit of an acid trip...Făkünamę wrote:Is it worth pirating?
.. I should start a blog called 'Worth Pirating'.
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 40990
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: The Hobbit will be Three Films, not Two
I understand it now. and I'll stay with the book, with or without ergot derivatives.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
- JimC
- The sentimental bloke
- Posts: 74076
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
- About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: The Hobbit will be Three Films, not Two
The first Hobbit film got canned in reviews here, but I'll probably go see it sometime in January. I actually haven't seen a film for over a year...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!
And my gin!
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: The Hobbit will be Three Films, not Two
I've seen loads of good reviews for it.JimC wrote:The first Hobbit film got canned in reviews here, but I'll probably go see it sometime in January. I actually haven't seen a film for over a year...

- tattuchu
- a dickload of cocks
- Posts: 21889
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 2:59 pm
- About me: I'm having trouble with the trolley.
- Location: Marmite-upon-Toast, Wankershire
- Contact:
Re: The Hobbit will be Three Films, not Two
It's got a 65% rating over at Rotten Tomatoes. Loads of bad reviews. Which is baffling to me since I thought it was very good. Not that RT is The Bible or anything. And not that my opinion carries a lot of weight. But still. I read the negative reviews and wonder if we've seen the same film.Gawdzilla Sama wrote:I've seen loads of good reviews for it.JimC wrote:The first Hobbit film got canned in reviews here, but I'll probably go see it sometime in January. I actually haven't seen a film for over a year...
People think "queue" is just "q" followed by 4 silent letters.
But those letters are not silent.
They're just waiting their turn.
But those letters are not silent.
They're just waiting their turn.
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: The Hobbit will be Three Films, not Two
I could actually give a fuck about the reviews, as usual. It was a lot of fun. Damn near pissed myself not wanting to miss anything. The troll sequence was spot on.tattuchu wrote:It's got a 65% rating over at Rotten Tomatoes. Loads of bad reviews. Which is baffling to me since I thought it was very good. Not that RT is The Bible or anything. And not that my opinion carries a lot of weight. But still. I read the negative reviews and wonder if we've seen the same film.Gawdzilla Sama wrote:I've seen loads of good reviews for it.JimC wrote:The first Hobbit film got canned in reviews here, but I'll probably go see it sometime in January. I actually haven't seen a film for over a year...

Re: The Hobbit will be Three Films, not Two
I see. It sounds like I can wait for a half-decent pirate version then.
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: The Hobbit will be Three Films, not Two
Save yourself $11.25.Făkünamę wrote:I see. It sounds like I can wait for a half-decent pirate version then.
- tattuchu
- a dickload of cocks
- Posts: 21889
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 2:59 pm
- About me: I'm having trouble with the trolley.
- Location: Marmite-upon-Toast, Wankershire
- Contact:
Re: The Hobbit will be Three Films, not Two
I'm not so concerned that there were bad reviews. I can decide for myself what I think is worthwhile. It's more that I was puzzled by the strange disconnect between what the reviews were saying and the reality I perceive. Many of the reviewer's complaints seemed to me to be the exact opposite of what I witnessed right in front of my own eyes.Gawdzilla Sama wrote:I could actually give a fuck about the reviews, as usual. It was a lot of fun. Damn near pissed myself not wanting to miss anything. The troll sequence was spot on.tattuchu wrote:It's got a 65% rating over at Rotten Tomatoes. Loads of bad reviews. Which is baffling to me since I thought it was very good. Not that RT is The Bible or anything. And not that my opinion carries a lot of weight. But still. I read the negative reviews and wonder if we've seen the same film.Gawdzilla Sama wrote:I've seen loads of good reviews for it.JimC wrote:The first Hobbit film got canned in reviews here, but I'll probably go see it sometime in January. I actually haven't seen a film for over a year...
People think "queue" is just "q" followed by 4 silent letters.
But those letters are not silent.
They're just waiting their turn.
But those letters are not silent.
They're just waiting their turn.
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: The Hobbit will be Three Films, not Two
They get more pay for being bitchy.tattuchu wrote:I'm not so concerned that there were bad reviews. I can decide for myself what I think is worthwhile. It's more that I was puzzled by the strange disconnect between what the reviews were saying and the reality I perceive. Many of the reviewer's complaints seemed to me to be the exact opposite of what I witnessed right in front of my own eyes.Gawdzilla Sama wrote:I could actually give a fuck about the reviews, as usual. It was a lot of fun. Damn near pissed myself not wanting to miss anything. The troll sequence was spot on.tattuchu wrote:It's got a 65% rating over at Rotten Tomatoes. Loads of bad reviews. Which is baffling to me since I thought it was very good. Not that RT is The Bible or anything. And not that my opinion carries a lot of weight. But still. I read the negative reviews and wonder if we've seen the same film.Gawdzilla Sama wrote:I've seen loads of good reviews for it.JimC wrote:The first Hobbit film got canned in reviews here, but I'll probably go see it sometime in January. I actually haven't seen a film for over a year...
Re: The Hobbit will be Three Films, not Two
Randydeluxe wrote:There are about six natural endings in the book:
The defeat of the trolls.
The escape from the goblin lair.
The rescue by eagles.
The escape from the elves' prison.
The defeat of Smaug.
The actual end of the book.
I figure the three films will end with 2, 4, & 6, but you never know with someone who loves the source material as much as Jackson and crew. The ways he/they improved on the LOTR source material were remarkable.
I hope your tongue was firmly in cheek on this one Randy. "Improved" on the LOTR source material?
FUCKERPUNKERSHIT!
Wanna buy some pegs Dave, I've got some pegs here...
Wanna buy some pegs Dave, I've got some pegs here...
You're my wife now!
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 40990
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: The Hobbit will be Three Films, not Two
You mean unlike in the Fellowship otR?Gawdzilla Sama wrote:[
I could actually give a fuck about the reviews, as usual. It was a lot of fun. Damn near pissed myself not wanting to miss anything. The troll sequence was spot on.
That troll sequence always makes me feel murderous.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: The Hobbit will be Three Films, not Two
Why? They were just stone then. And the Fellowship did encounter them in the book.Svartalf wrote:You mean unlike in the Fellowship otR?Gawdzilla Sama wrote:[
I could actually give a fuck about the reviews, as usual. It was a lot of fun. Damn near pissed myself not wanting to miss anything. The troll sequence was spot on.
That troll sequence always makes me feel murderous.
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 40990
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: The Hobbit will be Three Films, not Two
Actually, in FotR, the only part of the cave troll you see is the foot, before Frodo stabs it with Sting and it goes away.
and I find that troll particularly ugly, and not in a successful way, plus the fact that in the original, the mithril shirt guarded frodo from an orc's spear thrust, whiule what happened in the film should have resulted in pureed frodo anyway, so I want to kill whoever designed and handled the troll, plus whoever wrote the scene and approved it (plus I want to slap whoever else participated in it with a week dead flounder for not protesting loud enough that such a scene had to be rewritten)
and I find that troll particularly ugly, and not in a successful way, plus the fact that in the original, the mithril shirt guarded frodo from an orc's spear thrust, whiule what happened in the film should have resulted in pureed frodo anyway, so I want to kill whoever designed and handled the troll, plus whoever wrote the scene and approved it (plus I want to slap whoever else participated in it with a week dead flounder for not protesting loud enough that such a scene had to be rewritten)
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests