She makes some interesting points.
I think CES might fall in love.

Boys are sexy. Well, some of them.tattuchu wrote:If she's a sexy woman, why's she got her hair cut like a boy?
Yeah, but if I'm sexually attracted to a woman, I want her to look like a woman, not a boy. I don't want to have to go back to therapyhadespussercats wrote:Boys are sexy. Well, some of them.tattuchu wrote:If she's a sexy woman, why's she got her hair cut like a boy?
Don't send me to jail for saying that, please!
The video is twenty minutes : that is not long : the back ground is completelyhadespussercats wrote:
That video is so goddamn long
I kept wondering why she d film herself in front of such an ugly kitchen
You say you try to avoid dismissing anything less there is an absolute reason for doing so.surreptitious57 wrote:The video is twenty minutes : that is not long : the back ground is completelyhadespussercats wrote:
That video is so goddamn long
I kept wondering why she d film herself in front of such an ugly kitchen
irrelevant to the arguments she was advancing : she was discussing feminism not
interior design : it is natural to observe it but in intellectual debate it is not necessary
to pontificate on it : I do try to avoid dismissing anything less there is an absolute reason
for doing so though : I agree with some of what she said : she speaks with the air of one who
is knowledgeable so I sat in silence and listened as we do at our age to those wiser than ourselves
No : it is not absolutely sensible at all to wonder why a woman films herself in a kitchen when discussinghadespussercats wrote:
You say you try to avoid dismissing anything less there is an absolute reason for doing so
When a woman films herself discussing feminism while sitting in a kitchen it is absolutely sensible to wonder at her reasons for choosing such a setting And since film is a visual medium the choice of setting matters If she didn t want people to consider the visual aspects of her presentation she could have simply posted a written argument or an audio recording
I m a little unclear why you are so ready to decide that she s wiser than you based on nothing but her knowledgeable air Of course given that you made that choice you re probably right
I find it really difficult to understand why you don't perceive any significance to a woman discussing feminism while sitting in a kitchen.surreptitious57 wrote:No : it is not absolutely sensible at all to wonder why a woman films herself in a kitchen when discussinghadespussercats wrote:
You say you try to avoid dismissing anything less there is an absolute reason for doing so
When a woman films herself discussing feminism while sitting in a kitchen it is absolutely sensible to wonder at her reasons for choosing such a setting And since film is a visual medium the choice of setting matters If she didn t want people to consider the visual aspects of her presentation she could have simply posted a written argument or an audio recording
I m a little unclear why you are so ready to decide that she s wiser than you based on nothing but her knowledgeable air Of course given that you made that choice you re probably right
feminism : the setting is completely irrelevant to the subject matter : what is not however is whether
her arguments are presented with logic and reason and are delivered in a clear and precise manner
Yes : film is a visual medium but the purpose of this particular one is the deployment of a set of
ideas that the individual in it is referencing : the rest is superfluous : as to why I think she is
wiser than me : that is because she possesses a greater command of language and is more
perceptive : I do not like to think I am intellectually superior to any one less evidence is
overwhelming and in this case the answer is a definitive no : it is rather unwise to go
through life thinking you know more than you do : so I prefer humility to arrogance
hadespussercats wrote:
I find it really difficult to understand why you don t perceive any significance to a woman discussing feminism while sitting in a kitchen
If said woman were pregnant wearing a floral apron and had bare feet and had just set her mop aside to start talking about how feminism belittles and objectifies women would you think those signifiers were important
You don t find her Rachel Maddow crop significant
You say this woman is more perceptive than you I don t doubt that for a second I think she understands exactly what the implications are of discussing these things while sitting in Womans Traditional Place I certainly think its reasonable to assume she does anyway and to explore the significance of that choice
The fact that I find those messages intended or not more interesting than her speech doesn t make me arrogant I think dismissing all visual communication as superfluous is arrogant of you
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests