Lying for Reason and Science

A forum to talk about other sites and things you've found in the jungle that is the internet.

Please take a moment to read the rationalia guidelines: http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3449
Post Reply
User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: Lying for Reason and Science

Post by Robert_S » Wed Jun 20, 2012 12:44 am

Tero wrote:Was RD forum the first "atheist" forum for all of you people? I was involved with a a bunch of forums then so I did post that much. I was mainly looking for places to practice some Finnish on a daily basis.
Yes. It helped me liberate myself from the 12-Step woo and I'll be forever grateful to the old forum for that!
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
lordpasternack
Divine Knob Twiddler
Posts: 6459
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:05 am
About me: I have remarkable elbows.
Contact:

Re: Lying for Reason and Science

Post by lordpasternack » Wed Jun 20, 2012 1:03 am

I'll get back onto this tomorrow. And don't worry - I haven't really got to the juicier bits, yet. :tea:
Then they for sudden joy did weep,
And I for sorrow sung,
That such a king should play bo-peep,
And go the fools among.
Prithee, nuncle, keep a schoolmaster that can teach
thy fool to lie: I would fain learn to lie.

User avatar
borealis
Diggiloo Diggiley
Posts: 2329
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 12:01 am
About me: Oozy rat in a sanitary zoO.
Location: southern normaldy
Contact:

Re: Lying for Reason and Science

Post by borealis » Wed Jun 20, 2012 8:54 am

As a random atheist, I don't give a damn. But as a random donor, I do. :leave:

User avatar
lordpasternack
Divine Knob Twiddler
Posts: 6459
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:05 am
About me: I have remarkable elbows.
Contact:

Re: Lying for Reason and Science

Post by lordpasternack » Wed Jun 20, 2012 11:17 am

borealis wrote:As a random atheist, I don't give a damn. But as a random donor, I do. :leave:
My emphasis.

I'll mention simply and briefly right now that, so far as I am informed, all donations made through RD.net go through R. Elisabeth Cornwell's PERSONAL PayPal account, and if you mail a cheque, it goes to the UPS PO box that she attends to personally, in Virginia. And you can be well assured that she is not audited at all - and even if she was, there are a thousand ways she could play funnybuggers with those donations, and hide her tracks, without it being properly seen. And the fact that it's her personal account means that it would be very difficult to investigate, even if something nefarious was suspected.

You just have to trust her to be honest - and frankly, who wouldn't? :pardon:

Such is the 'evidence-based' 'critically thinking' trainwreck that is RDFRS.
Then they for sudden joy did weep,
And I for sorrow sung,
That such a king should play bo-peep,
And go the fools among.
Prithee, nuncle, keep a schoolmaster that can teach
thy fool to lie: I would fain learn to lie.

User avatar
Audley Strange
"I blame the victim"
Posts: 7485
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Lying for Reason and Science

Post by Audley Strange » Wed Jun 20, 2012 1:57 pm

Svartalf wrote:You know, I think I'm more interested in pseudo history or pseudo science books like the stuff by Graham Hancock, Zechariah Sitchin, the Holy Blood/Holy Grail folk etc... at least, in those, you can make a game of extracting the nuggets of truth from the woo matrix.
You know what... I was thinking about just this thing since I've been watching the utterly hilarious Ancient Aliens. I mean it is preposterous, totally, but once you get by all the sci-fi bullshit it tells you quite a lot about ancient architecture, empires, belief systems, art, history, politics, fascinating natural phenomenon and a whole host of other topics that without the hilarious Centauri Ambassador Molari lookalike most people would have zero interest it. Same with the Assassin's Creed games. They've got tonnes of nice articles in the games about architecture history and European politics during the middle ages all wrapped up in a war between Templar's and Assassins.

Is pseudoscience them perhaps stealth knowledge or is it a case of "a little knowledge is a dangeous thing."

I'm not sure, but I'm curious about it.
"What started as a legitimate effort by the townspeople of Salem to identify, capture and kill those who did Satan's bidding quickly deteriorated into a witch hunt" Army Man

User avatar
lordpasternack
Divine Knob Twiddler
Posts: 6459
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:05 am
About me: I have remarkable elbows.
Contact:

Re: Lying for Reason and Science

Post by lordpasternack » Wed Jun 20, 2012 2:02 pm

Part 1: Continued...

Time for a bit of The Purpose of Purpose




Here's how the credits appeared in their original form, in 24 November 2009:

Image


And on 24 August 2010

Image
Hmmm... Where have those credits gone?


And on 31 October 2010

Image
Oh, they're back!


And here's how they now look. (Again with a link to the Google Cache, in case they change in the near future.)

Image

Oh? Really? R. Elisabeth Cornwell is a 'producer'? Where did that one come from?


The lovely irony here, also, is that if you skip to the near the end (52:07) and let the credits roll - there sure as hell isn't any mention of any 'R. Elisabeth Cornwell' as producer (which she surely would have added, if she had the chance to contribute but a mouse-click and a few keystrokes to the production). But we shan't let pesky reality get in the way of our pretensions.

Last edited by lordpasternack on Wed Jun 20, 2012 2:11 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Then they for sudden joy did weep,
And I for sorrow sung,
That such a king should play bo-peep,
And go the fools among.
Prithee, nuncle, keep a schoolmaster that can teach
thy fool to lie: I would fain learn to lie.

User avatar
Tyrannical
Posts: 6468
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
Contact:

Re: Lying for Reason and Science

Post by Tyrannical » Wed Jun 20, 2012 2:07 pm

Seth wrote:
lordpasternack wrote:
Robert_S wrote:Were all these 73 videos all produced by JT/Upper Branch?
Most definitely. They don't all have explicit copyright notes - and there may indeed be some genuine ambiguity as to who owns intellectual property there - but if you look at the evidence, for the ones I was capable of unearthing evidence for - they were at least filmed by JT (occasionally in collaboration with others).

And that R. Elisabeth Cornwell is so blithe as to remove a clear copyright notice - as if that means that, therefore - poof! - the copyright ceases to exist - tells you much of what you need to know about her fundamental soundness of mind. Of course - the same goes for the rest of the credits she's gone and disappeared - but I just thought that example really took the biscuit - and on a fucking Baloney Detection video, too!

Either she has no sense of irony, or this is all a very elaborate set-up. Like a test, to see which of Richard's fans really are critical thinkers, and devotees to evidence-based understanding. :coffee:
If Timonen was an employee of Dawkins at the time the films were made, it was a "work for hire" and he doesn't own any of the copyrights, and unless he negotiated a legal document specifying that he be credited with certain aspects of production, he's just fucked and Dawkins can scrub his name if he wants.
No, Timonen owns the copyright unless he specifically gave it up in a written contract.
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41004
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: Lying for Reason and Science

Post by Svartalf » Wed Jun 20, 2012 4:26 pm

Audley Strange wrote:
Svartalf wrote:You know, I think I'm more interested in pseudo history or pseudo science books like the stuff by Graham Hancock, Zechariah Sitchin, the Holy Blood/Holy Grail folk etc... at least, in those, you can make a game of extracting the nuggets of truth from the woo matrix.
You know what... I was thinking about just this thing since I've been watching the utterly hilarious Ancient Aliens. I mean it is preposterous, totally, but once you get by all the sci-fi bullshit it tells you quite a lot about ancient architecture, empires, belief systems, art, history, politics, fascinating natural phenomenon and a whole host of other topics that without the hilarious Centauri Ambassador Molari lookalike most people would have zero interest it. Same with the Assassin's Creed games. They've got tonnes of nice articles in the games about architecture history and European politics during the middle ages all wrapped up in a war between Templar's and Assassins.

Is pseudoscience them perhaps stealth knowledge or is it a case of "a little knowledge is a dangeous thing."

I'm not sure, but I'm curious about it.
Sneaking in knowledge through entertainment can be fine... the problem is making sure the audience gets the right stuff and does not mix it up with the fictional bits.

and pseudoscience really mixes fact and fiction far too much for my taste... separating the two can be a pain.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
lordpasternack
Divine Knob Twiddler
Posts: 6459
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:05 am
About me: I have remarkable elbows.
Contact:

Re: Lying for Reason and Science

Post by lordpasternack » Wed Jun 20, 2012 4:57 pm

Part 1: Continued again...

Who wants an introduction to RDFRS? (Don't worry, it's very much an expired and irrelevant introduction by now. They're about 'innovating for a secular world', now - and have made manifestly clear by now how little they actually value critical thinking and evidence-based understanding. Or at least - they're clear about how much they they value it for other people, and how little they actually value it for themselves.)





Here's how the credits appeared on 21 June 2010:

Image


And here's how they looked until a few days ago. (Google Cache - correct at time of going to press.)

Image

Oh? Really? R. Elisabeth Cornwell is a 'producer'? Where did that one come from?


And how they look now:

Image


Once again - you are invited to let the credits roll:

Image

Then they for sudden joy did weep,
And I for sorrow sung,
That such a king should play bo-peep,
And go the fools among.
Prithee, nuncle, keep a schoolmaster that can teach
thy fool to lie: I would fain learn to lie.

User avatar
Ian
Mr Incredible
Posts: 16975
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:42 pm
Location: Washington DC

Re: Lying for Reason and Science

Post by Ian » Wed Jun 20, 2012 5:03 pm

Tero wrote:Was RD forum the first "atheist" forum for all of you people? I was involved with a a bunch of forums then so I did post that much. I was mainly looking for places to practice some Finnish on a daily basis.
My first was Sam Harris' forum, though I don't know if it still exists. It was a quiet little place, and I spent most of my time arguing with a hopelessly devout Christian who called himself The Champion. I think he showed up at RDF too, though it wasn't long after I joined RDF that I became a degenerate, non-intellectual pervert, and I didn't talk to him much there.

You people have corrupted me, and I thank you.

User avatar
klr
(%gibber(who=klr, what=Leprageek);)
Posts: 32964
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 1:25 pm
About me: The money was just resting in my account.
Location: Airstrip Two
Contact:

Re: Lying for Reason and Science

Post by klr » Wed Jun 20, 2012 5:05 pm

Ian wrote:
Tero wrote:Was RD forum the first "atheist" forum for all of you people? I was involved with a a bunch of forums then so I did post that much. I was mainly looking for places to practice some Finnish on a daily basis.
My first was Sam Harris' forum, though I don't know if it still exists. It was a quiet little place, and I spent most of my time arguing with a hopelessly devout Christian who called himself The Champion. I think he showed up at RDF too, though it wasn't long after I joined RDF that I became a degenerate, non-intellectual pervert, and I didn't talk to him much there.

You people have corrupted me, and I thank you.
Oh he did ... I can't remember if we banned him, or if he left by himself. :zilla:
God has no place within these walls, just like facts have no place within organized religion. - Superintendent Chalmers

It's not up to us to choose which laws we want to obey. If it were, I'd kill everyone who looked at me cock-eyed! - Rex Banner

The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression. - Gary Larson

:mob: :comp: :mob:

User avatar
Clinton Huxley
19th century monkeybitch.
Posts: 23739
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Lying for Reason and Science

Post by Clinton Huxley » Wed Jun 20, 2012 5:29 pm

I remember The Champion. Hah.
"I grow old … I grow old …
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled"

AND MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND All!

Imagehttp://25kv.co.uk/date_counter.php?date ... 20counting!!![/img-sig]

User avatar
lordpasternack
Divine Knob Twiddler
Posts: 6459
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:05 am
About me: I have remarkable elbows.
Contact:

Re: Lying for Reason and Science

Post by lordpasternack » Wed Jun 20, 2012 5:48 pm

Part 1: Continued one last time...

Two more attempts at making my point, should suffice - before we move onto the other stuff that compounds the wanton dishonesty and questionable sanity detailed here.

PZ Myers Discussion:




Here's how the credits appeared in their original form on 27 September 2009

Image


And on 9 April 2010

Image

Those credits - they've vanished...


And here's how they look now (with obligatory Google Cache link, in case they are amended shortly.)

Image

Oh? Really? R. Elisabeth Cornwell is a 'producer'? Where did that one come from?


And, Steven Weinberg Discussion:




Here's how the credits appeared on 27 September 2009

Image


And on 9 April 2010

Image

The credits appear to have gone missing...


And here's how they look now (with obligatory Google Cache link)

Image

Okay - you're shitting me now. Can someone explain to me just who the fuck made R. Elisabeth Cornwell a 'producer'? - and what inspired that particular afterthought that happened after 2011?

Oh - it was good old R. Elisabeth Cornwell herself? How innovative of her!
Then they for sudden joy did weep,
And I for sorrow sung,
That such a king should play bo-peep,
And go the fools among.
Prithee, nuncle, keep a schoolmaster that can teach
thy fool to lie: I would fain learn to lie.

User avatar
Thumpalumpacus
Posts: 1357
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 6:13 pm
About me: Texan by birth, musician by nature, writer by avocation, freethinker by inclination.
Contact:

Re: Lying for Reason and Science

Post by Thumpalumpacus » Wed Jun 20, 2012 6:36 pm

Audley Strange wrote:
Svartalf wrote:You know, I think I'm more interested in pseudo history or pseudo science books like the stuff by Graham Hancock, Zechariah Sitchin, the Holy Blood/Holy Grail folk etc... at least, in those, you can make a game of extracting the nuggets of truth from the woo matrix.
You know what... I was thinking about just this thing since I've been watching the utterly hilarious Ancient Aliens. I mean it is preposterous, totally, but once you get by all the sci-fi bullshit it tells you quite a lot about ancient architecture, empires, belief systems, art, history, politics, fascinating natural phenomenon and a whole host of other topics that without the hilarious Centauri Ambassador Molari lookalike most people would have zero interest it. Same with the Assassin's Creed games. They've got tonnes of nice articles in the games about architecture history and European politics during the middle ages all wrapped up in a war between Templar's and Assassins.

Is pseudoscience them perhaps stealth knowledge or is it a case of "a little knowledge is a dangeous thing."

I'm not sure, but I'm curious about it.
One of the things that ignited my interest in First Word War aviation in particular was getting the game Red Baron. Included in its software is a substantial PDF (perhaps 120 pages) that gives a pretty detailed overview of the role aviation played in that war.

I give that sort of thing the Wiki treatment: I'll read, or watch, with interest, and if my interest is piqued, I then look into the source material to delve deeper into the topic.
these are things we think we know
these are feelings we might even share
these are thoughts we hide from ourselves
these are secrets we cannot lay bare.

surreptitious57
Posts: 1057
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:07 am

Re: Lying for Reason and Science

Post by surreptitious57 » Wed Jun 20, 2012 7:19 pm

You know what you should do Heather and I mean this in all seriousness : write a book
on this for you are so obsessed with it : I do not confess to know exactly what your
motivation is here and I can sympathise with you if you feel wronged but some
times it is just best to let things go : either that or do some thing positive
with it though if you are still doing this say two years from now I will be
concerned : understand that no one else here is worried about this
Now please let it go before it soon starts to take control of you
A MIND IS LIKE A PARACHUTE : IT DOES NOT WORK UNLESS IT IS OPEN

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests