Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Locked
User avatar
kiki5711
Forever with Ekwok
Posts: 3954
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:51 am
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by kiki5711 » Wed May 23, 2012 5:18 pm

No, he didn't. Clearly he anticipated a violent reaction from a potential burglar, which is why he was armed. Duh.
"potential burglar"= profiling
"anticipated a violent reaction=premeditated murder

User avatar
kiki5711
Forever with Ekwok
Posts: 3954
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:51 am
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by kiki5711 » Wed May 23, 2012 5:19 pm

amused wrote:
kiki5711 wrote:... Martin offered him some skittles. ...
In that case, I'd shoot him too.

zimmerman was mad because they were not the kind he likes. ;) ;) ;)

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by Coito ergo sum » Wed May 23, 2012 5:24 pm

kiki5711 wrote:
No, he didn't. Clearly he anticipated a violent reaction from a potential burglar, which is why he was armed. Duh.
"potential burglar"= profiling
It's only profiling if the judgment was that Martin was a suspect because he was black. It's not profiling if Zimmerman thought he was suspicious because of his behavior, which is what Zimmerman said on the 911 tape. And, you already said that you didn't think Zimmerman thought Martin was suspicious because he was black, right? Deciding someone is suspicous based on their behavior is not profiling in the least.

What do you call your references to Zimmerman as psycho and paranoid, among other such things?
kiki5711 wrote: "anticipated a violent reaction=premeditated murder
On what planet? :hilarious:

User avatar
maiforpeace
Account Suspended at Member's Request
Posts: 15726
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:41 am
Location: under the redwood trees

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by maiforpeace » Wed May 23, 2012 5:28 pm

Coito ergo sum wrote:
kiki5711 wrote:
No, he didn't. Clearly he anticipated a violent reaction from a potential burglar, which is why he was armed. Duh.
"potential burglar"= profiling
It's only profiling if the judgment was that Martin was a suspect because he was black. It's not profiling if Zimmerman thought he was suspicious because of his behavior, which is what Zimmerman said on the 911 tape. And, you already said that you didn't think Zimmerman thought Martin was suspicious because he was black, right? Deciding someone is suspicous based on their behavior is not profiling in the least.

What do you call your references to Zimmerman as psycho and paranoid, among other such things?
It's still profiling...though not necessarily racial profiling.
Atheists have always argued that this world is all that we have, and that our duty is to one another to make the very most and best of it. ~Christopher Hitchens~
Image
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3534/379 ... 3be9_o.jpg[/imgc]

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by Coito ergo sum » Wed May 23, 2012 5:31 pm

kiki5711 wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:
kiki5711 wrote: I also don't think zimm was hell bent on killing martin from the start. But he understemated what kind of reaction he would get from martin,
What reaction did he get from Martin? :ask:
Martin offered him some skittles. :bored: :? :? :thinks:
No, seriously. You said Zimmerman underestimated the kind of reaction he would get from Martin. What reaction do you think Zimmerman got from Martin?

As far as I can tell, the reaction he got was: Martin looked at him. Martin stared at him. Martin started approaching Zimmerman when Zimmerman was in his truck. Martin ran off.

I thought, from your perspective, that was the last "reaction" Zimmerman got. Wasn't it? Didn't you say many times that you thought Martin was just proceeding on home?

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by Coito ergo sum » Wed May 23, 2012 5:32 pm

maiforpeace wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:
kiki5711 wrote:
No, he didn't. Clearly he anticipated a violent reaction from a potential burglar, which is why he was armed. Duh.
"potential burglar"= profiling
It's only profiling if the judgment was that Martin was a suspect because he was black. It's not profiling if Zimmerman thought he was suspicious because of his behavior, which is what Zimmerman said on the 911 tape. And, you already said that you didn't think Zimmerman thought Martin was suspicious because he was black, right? Deciding someone is suspicous based on their behavior is not profiling in the least.

What do you call your references to Zimmerman as psycho and paranoid, among other such things?
It's still profiling...though not necessarily racial profiling.
If not racial, then what's the basis of the profiling? Height? Weight? Age? Something else?

Profiling is taking preset qualities and inferring suspicion from them.

That is distinct from seeing a particular person doing X, Y and/or Z and inferring that they are suspicious because of those things.

Please explain what the profiling is that you're referring to.

Edit: Calling it profiling to look at someone's behavior is like saying that if the cops see you swerving on the road, they're profiling you as a drunk driver if they pull you over.
Last edited by Coito ergo sum on Wed May 23, 2012 5:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Tyrannical
Posts: 6468
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by Tyrannical » Wed May 23, 2012 5:36 pm

kiki5711 wrote:
No, he didn't. Clearly he anticipated a violent reaction from a potential burglar, which is why he was armed. Duh.
"potential burglar"= profiling
"anticipated a violent reaction=premeditated murder
Black = potentials criminals is just commonsense.
That's the way Blacks act, that is the way they are treated.
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.

User avatar
maiforpeace
Account Suspended at Member's Request
Posts: 15726
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:41 am
Location: under the redwood trees

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by maiforpeace » Wed May 23, 2012 5:41 pm

Tyrannical wrote:
kiki5711 wrote:
No, he didn't. Clearly he anticipated a violent reaction from a potential burglar, which is why he was armed. Duh.
"potential burglar"= profiling
"anticipated a violent reaction=premeditated murder
Black = potentials criminals is just commonsense.
That's the way Blacks act, that is the way they are treated.
:ddpan:

I'm so proud that racism is alive and thriving on this forum.
Atheists have always argued that this world is all that we have, and that our duty is to one another to make the very most and best of it. ~Christopher Hitchens~
Image
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3534/379 ... 3be9_o.jpg[/imgc]

User avatar
kiki5711
Forever with Ekwok
Posts: 3954
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:51 am
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by kiki5711 » Wed May 23, 2012 5:57 pm

Edit: Calling it profiling to look at someone's behavior is like saying that if the cops see you swerving on the road, they're profiling you as a drunk driver if they pull you over.
Bingo! you win a 1,000 dollars

Even if you're not drunk but swerving all over the road, something is not right and they have a duty to pull yu over.

User avatar
Tero
Just saying
Posts: 51232
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
About me: 15-32-25
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by Tero » Wed May 23, 2012 6:02 pm

I would like to stick to my guns and dismiss the racism. I'm prejudiced against gun nuts. There may be profiling and they may have a short fuse. But
mainly they are looking for opportunity to be heroes, vigilantes. Kind of like Bush Jr.

User avatar
Tyrannical
Posts: 6468
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by Tyrannical » Wed May 23, 2012 6:06 pm

maiforpeace wrote:
Tyrannical wrote:
kiki5711 wrote:
No, he didn't. Clearly he anticipated a violent reaction from a potential burglar, which is why he was armed. Duh.
"potential burglar"= profiling
"anticipated a violent reaction=premeditated murder
Black = potentials criminals is just commonsense.
That's the way Blacks act, that is the way they are treated.
:ddpan:

I'm so proud that racism is alive and thriving on this forum.
Don't blame me, blame the way Blacks act.
Our ancestors were well aware of it well before Darwin. Yet now we are required to pretend they are equal :doh:
White society should not need to suffer the inferiority of the Negro.
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by Coito ergo sum » Wed May 23, 2012 6:10 pm

Tero wrote:I would like to stick to my guns and dismiss the racism. I'm prejudiced against gun nuts. There may be profiling and they may have a short fuse. But
mainly they are looking for opportunity to be heroes, vigilantes. Kind of like Bush Jr.
LOL - prejudiced against gun NUTS or gun OWNERS. What is the difference, if any, in your mind?

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by Coito ergo sum » Wed May 23, 2012 6:12 pm

kiki5711 wrote:
Edit: Calling it profiling to look at someone's behavior is like saying that if the cops see you swerving on the road, they're profiling you as a drunk driver if they pull you over.
Bingo! you win a 1,000 dollars

Even if you're not drunk but swerving all over the road, something is not right and they have a duty to pull yu over.
Right, so someone's BEHAVIOR justifying the suspicion is not profiling. Exactly.

If you think Martin was profiled then please explain what was the profile? You said you didn't think it was race. So, what was it?

User avatar
Tero
Just saying
Posts: 51232
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
About me: 15-32-25
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by Tero » Wed May 23, 2012 6:18 pm

Coito ergo sum wrote:
Tero wrote:I would like to stick to my guns and dismiss the racism. I'm prejudiced against gun nuts. There may be profiling and they may have a short fuse. But
mainly they are looking for opportunity to be heroes, vigilantes. Kind of like Bush Jr.
LOL - prejudiced against gun NUTS or gun OWNERS. What is the difference, if any, in your mind?
Typically gun owners have a life, outside of guns. Nuts do not have a life. Guns need cash. So a job usually.

User avatar
kiki5711
Forever with Ekwok
Posts: 3954
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:51 am
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by kiki5711 » Wed May 23, 2012 6:50 pm

Right, so someone's BEHAVIOR justifying the suspicion is not profiling. Exactly.
I just said that it was profiling. What is your problem with understanding what I say?
If you think Martin was profiled then please explain what was the profile? You said you didn't think it was race. So, what was it?
You said it yourself that zimm thought he was a thief and looked like one, acting strange or something to that effect.....
Dear, THAT IS PROFILING.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Woodbutcher and 16 guests