Debunk the Teleological Argument for God

Holy Crap!
Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Debunk the Teleological Argument for God

Post by Coito ergo sum » Wed Apr 18, 2012 4:59 pm

Teleological Argument, also known as the Watchmaker Hypothesis. Proposed by Thomas Aquinas, who created the 5 proofs of God. This argument states that a complex object, like a watch, appears to be designed, and because it is unlikely that chance created it, some intelligence must have. They translate that to the universe, and therefore, God exists.

This argument never resonated with me. Mainly because it's called the watchmaker hypothesis. The choice of a timepiece as the complex argument - a watch needs a watchmaker.

If the teleological argument were of any worth, I would think it would be persuasive enough to call it the "rockmaker hypothesis" or the "hydrogen maker hypothesis." I think it speaks to the fact that people look at rocks as naturally created, without any intelligent or divine intervention, that renders the teleological argument unpersuasive. They say "see, here is this contraption that we know requires someone to make it; therefore, everything requires someone to make it." If that's true, why use a watch? Why not a rock?

It's like the story used to illustrate this by creationists - if you walk across a field and see a watch, you know that someone made that watch. Well, there are rocks in the field to, and we don't think anyone made them. Ergo, it does not necessarily follow that complex things in the universe are made by intelligent beings.

Does that work to debunk it? Or, are there any other debunks for the teleological argument?

User avatar
mistermack
Posts: 15093
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
About me: Never rong.
Contact:

Re: Debunk the Teleological Argument for God

Post by mistermack » Wed Apr 18, 2012 5:15 pm

I dunno, why not go for the bleedin obvious.
When did a watch ever give birth?
I know what made me. My parents.
You see a watch, you know someone made it. You see a human, you know that they are the result of sexual reproduction.
Comparing watches to humans is therefore stupid. That also applies to the Universe.
Everything has a previous history.
You can look, and tell that a watch had a maker. Man made things are mostly pretty obvious.
But complex things daily grow from simple ingredients naturally. You can look at anything else, and work out where it came from. Rocks, trees, moons, stars, all understood and explained by previous history.

The big bang is the only thing so far unexplained by previous history.
So it's the god of the gaps. No explanation, chuck in god.

I thought Thomas Aquinas was supposed to be a thinker. But of course, he came before Darwin, so you can't be too hard on him.
Last edited by mistermack on Wed Apr 18, 2012 5:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Debunk the Teleological Argument for God

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Wed Apr 18, 2012 5:25 pm

You come upon a message written in the sand on a beach. You don't see a designer, but you there has to be one because the words are intelligently designed.

You come off looking like an ass because you know the words are words because you've been trained to see patterns in the shapes. You also skipped the fact that there are billions of grains of sand on the beach, beautifully "designed" to be beach sand. There's no sign of designer, and no reason think there is one.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Debunk the Teleological Argument for God

Post by Coito ergo sum » Wed Apr 18, 2012 5:29 pm

But...what are the odds that all those grains of sand would be organized together in just that order....it's astronomical!

User avatar
mistermack
Posts: 15093
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
About me: Never rong.
Contact:

Re: Debunk the Teleological Argument for God

Post by mistermack » Wed Apr 18, 2012 5:33 pm

What kind of god would create the entire Sahara desert, just for the benefit of the bacteria living on one grain of sand?
Because even that is not enough of a contrast, of creating the entire Universe, just for a home for humans.
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Debunk the Teleological Argument for God

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Wed Apr 18, 2012 5:41 pm

Coito ergo sum wrote:But...what are the odds that all those grains of sand would be organized together in just that order....it's astronomical!
The fact that they ARE gathered together in that organization would indicated a high probability that they could.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Debunk the Teleological Argument for God

Post by Coito ergo sum » Wed Apr 18, 2012 5:42 pm

mistermack wrote:What kind of god would create the entire Sahara desert, just for the benefit of the bacteria living on one grain of sand?
Because even that is not enough of a contrast, of creating the entire Universe, just for a home for humans.
I think the Earth was made for beetles.

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Debunk the Teleological Argument for God

Post by Coito ergo sum » Wed Apr 18, 2012 5:43 pm

Gawdzilla wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:But...what are the odds that all those grains of sand would be organized together in just that order....it's astronomical!
The fact that they ARE gathered together in that organization would indicated a high probability that they could.
Yeah, but the odds of them coming together in just that particular order, and not some other order, are pretty long. :{D

User avatar
mistermack
Posts: 15093
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
About me: Never rong.
Contact:

Re: Debunk the Teleological Argument for God

Post by mistermack » Wed Apr 18, 2012 6:07 pm

Coito ergo sum wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:But...what are the odds that all those grains of sand would be organized together in just that order....it's astronomical!
The fact that they ARE gathered together in that organization would indicated a high probability that they could.
Yeah, but the odds of them coming together in just that particular order, and not some other order, are pretty long. :{D
So if you win the biggest lottery, odds of 500,000,000 to one, that means it was "meant" to be you ?
Of course not. There were 500 million ways the balls could come out. But they HAD to come out in one way, and that just happened to be you. There were 499,999,999 losing tickets.

Similarly, there were billions or gazillions of ways that the Universe could have turned out.
It happened to be this way. It had to come out one way or another. There were gazillions of losing universe layouts that never happened.
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Debunk the Teleological Argument for God

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Wed Apr 18, 2012 6:13 pm

Coito ergo sum wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:But...what are the odds that all those grains of sand would be organized together in just that order....it's astronomical!
The fact that they ARE gathered together in that organization would indicated a high probability that they could.
Yeah, but the odds of them coming together in just that particular order, and not some other order, are pretty long. :{D
Until you notice there's more than one beach, of course. :read:
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Thumpalumpacus
Posts: 1357
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 6:13 pm
About me: Texan by birth, musician by nature, writer by avocation, freethinker by inclination.
Contact:

Re: Debunk the Teleological Argument for God

Post by Thumpalumpacus » Wed Apr 18, 2012 6:14 pm

The retina.
these are things we think we know
these are feelings we might even share
these are thoughts we hide from ourselves
these are secrets we cannot lay bare.

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Debunk the Teleological Argument for God

Post by Coito ergo sum » Wed Apr 18, 2012 6:16 pm

Gawdzilla wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:But...what are the odds that all those grains of sand would be organized together in just that order....it's astronomical!
The fact that they ARE gathered together in that organization would indicated a high probability that they could.
Yeah, but the odds of them coming together in just that particular order, and not some other order, are pretty long. :{D
Until you notice there's more than one beach, of course. :read:
What are the odds of all the beaches being arranged just so? Couldn't happen by chance.... :tut:

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Debunk the Teleological Argument for God

Post by Coito ergo sum » Wed Apr 18, 2012 6:17 pm

mistermack wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:But...what are the odds that all those grains of sand would be organized together in just that order....it's astronomical!
The fact that they ARE gathered together in that organization would indicated a high probability that they could.
Yeah, but the odds of them coming together in just that particular order, and not some other order, are pretty long. :{D
So if you win the biggest lottery, odds of 500,000,000 to one, that means it was "meant" to be you ?
Of course not. There were 500 million ways the balls could come out. But they HAD to come out in one way, and that just happened to be you. There were 499,999,999 losing tickets.

Similarly, there were billions or gazillions of ways that the Universe could have turned out.
It happened to be this way. It had to come out one way or another. There were gazillions of losing universe layouts that never happened.
Talk to any lottery winner. They seem to think god had something to do with it. :{D

User avatar
mistermack
Posts: 15093
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
About me: Never rong.
Contact:

Re: Debunk the Teleological Argument for God

Post by mistermack » Wed Apr 18, 2012 6:28 pm

Coito ergo sum wrote: Talk to any lottery winner. They seem to think god had something to do with it. :{D
And yet the odd thing is that you don't get 499,999,999 losers blaming god. Strange.
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Debunk the Teleological Argument for God

Post by Coito ergo sum » Wed Apr 18, 2012 6:35 pm

mistermack wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote: Talk to any lottery winner. They seem to think god had something to do with it. :{D
And yet the odd thing is that you don't get 499,999,999 losers blaming god. Strange.
Maybe they should thank him. Money is the root of all evil, therefore losing the lottery is like being delivered from evil.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests