What were you before you became and atheist?

Holy Crap!
Post Reply
User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: What were you before you became and atheist?

Post by Jason » Fri Oct 28, 2011 2:16 am

What Seraph said. If you try to discuss something with him where you disagree you'll find it impossible as he never stays focused on a central point. He'll often argue circles around a vague notion that your supposed to guess at. When his argument is refuted he'll often cherry pick something else and respond to that as if it was the focus all along. It's more than a little irritating.

Ignorance and faulty logic doesn't bother me when it's honest.

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74168
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: What were you before you became and atheist?

Post by JimC » Fri Oct 28, 2011 2:21 am

PordFrefect wrote:What Seraph said. If you try to discuss something with him where you disagree you'll find it impossible as he never stays focused on a central point. He'll often argue circles around a vague notion that your supposed to guess at. When his argument is refuted he'll often cherry pick something else and respond to that as if it was the focus all along. It's more than a little irritating.
I agree, but there are also some interesting and thought-provoking ideas in many of his posts. As someone else said, it's not the ideas that are the problem, it's aspects of his mode of interaction with other posters... And it is not a problem in any serious way; it would be ridiculous to term it trolling, for example. Just a bit annoying...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
charlou
arseist
Posts: 32530
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am

Re: What were you before you became and atheist?

Post by charlou » Fri Oct 28, 2011 2:33 am

JimC wrote:I agree, but there are also some interesting and thought-provoking ideas in many of his posts.
It's good to try to look past the chaff to get to the appetising kernels ...
no fences

User avatar
charlou
arseist
Posts: 32530
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am

Re: What were you before you became and atheist?

Post by charlou » Fri Oct 28, 2011 2:34 am

ahhh ... and that's not a pony euphemism ... :mrgreen:
no fences

irretating
not too sweet to sledge
Posts: 4088
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 2:03 am
Contact:

Re: What were you before you became and atheist?

Post by irretating » Fri Oct 28, 2011 2:46 am

charlou wrote:ahhh ... and that's not a pony euphemism ... :mrgreen:
Neigh way :smug:

User avatar
charlou
arseist
Posts: 32530
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am

Re: What were you before you became and atheist?

Post by charlou » Fri Oct 28, 2011 2:47 am

As if I'd ever be so ... unstable ... :shifty:
no fences

irretating
not too sweet to sledge
Posts: 4088
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 2:03 am
Contact:

Re: What were you before you became and atheist?

Post by irretating » Fri Oct 28, 2011 2:49 am

...or unbridled... :leave:

User avatar
charlou
arseist
Posts: 32530
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am

Re: What were you before you became and atheist?

Post by charlou » Fri Oct 28, 2011 3:00 am

*clippety clop*
no fences

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41045
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: What were you before you became and atheist?

Post by Svartalf » Fri Oct 28, 2011 5:06 am

JimC wrote:From all the sterile and cranky arguing on this thread there emerges a topic which is actually quite interesting. Stripped of the preoccupation with "atheists don't really exist", the whole question of the degree to which our Christian-dominated past still affects aspects of our current society. Most in this thread accept that it does to a degree, even if in a fairly superficial way. It seems that Exi is suggesting the effects run deeper than most of us might accept.

There is a difference between how much this past religious influence effects aspects of social organisation such as government and law, and how much it affects one's persona, even if one has consciously rejected the need for a god or a religion.

I think this is a topic worth considering...
From what I can detect in every domain, from social mores to speech patterns, I'm afraid that thing runs deep and permeates our collective unconscious at every level.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41045
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: What were you before you became and atheist?

Post by Svartalf » Fri Oct 28, 2011 5:11 am

Feck wrote:If our cultural root is Christianity... Explain the names for the days of the week please !
less visible in English or German, but looks at Spanish where saturday is sabado (sabbath), and sunday domingo (Lord's day).
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41045
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: What were you before you became and atheist?

Post by Svartalf » Fri Oct 28, 2011 5:20 am

Feck wrote:
Exi5tentialist wrote:
Feck wrote:If our cultural root is Christianity... Explain the names for the days of the week please !
Would it be inaccurate to describe our names for the days of the week as a North European gloss, artificially superimposed on the Roman 7-day week? Is Rome not the true source of the christian religion? (and our calendar, and the Common Era itself?)

Without Rome's all-pervasive influence, wouldn't christianity just be another middle eastern religion for us westerners to get phobic about?
I think you will find the seven day week is a Babylonian invention .
So for what percentage of our history have we been a Christian culture ? and why does everything that happened before get ignored in your assumption ? Just cos I can't find any 4,00yr old churches around here but there are lots of standing stones and we don't parade saints around the streets but we do burn a few Viking longboats . We don't have a christian culture we have a Christian Veneer over the top of our culture .
Let's face it, any civilisation using a lunar based calendar, or soli lunar, will find the 7 day week, easily dividing the lunar month into 4 practical units, a natural thing... I'm not inclined to do research on the subject for the moment, but I wouldn't be surprised if other cultures had come up with it without contact with Mesopotamia or the cultures that adopted their week.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41045
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: What were you before you became and atheist?

Post by Svartalf » Fri Oct 28, 2011 5:27 am

Exi5tentialist wrote:
Feck wrote:If you don't like it here under the authoritarian structure and patriarchal authority that is rationalia you could leave,I mean we have so plainly refused to implement forum wide changes to accommodate you .
You see, that is an example of exclusivity. Exclusivity is a basic tool of discipline in most christian churches. It is yet another example of the way that so many of you who call yourselves atheists are culturally and behaviourally steeped in the mechanisms of christianity. You confidently state "we have" with the same confidence as those who sing "we plough the fields and scatter" in Sunday church. But there is no "We". "We" have decided nothing, let alone refused anything, besides which I have not so far formally proposed a single democratic reform here anyway.
Bug you. Banishing trouble makers has been a tool of social control since prehistory, and the world across. Ancient Athenians (and I supposed other Greek cities) ostracized public men whom were feared might become public enemies. Pagan Norse banished killers and other criminals, either abroad for a limited time, or from all civilisation, with anybody finding them allowed to kill them without legal repercussions. This has nothing to do with christianity specifically.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
Xamonas Chegwé
Bouncer
Bouncer
Posts: 50939
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:23 pm
About me: I have prehensile eyebrows.
I speak 9 languages fluently, one of which other people can also speak.
When backed into a corner, I fit perfectly - having a right-angled arse.
Location: Nottingham UK
Contact:

Re: What were you before you became and atheist?

Post by Xamonas Chegwé » Fri Oct 28, 2011 5:32 am

Svartalf wrote:
Exi5tentialist wrote:
Feck wrote:If you don't like it here under the authoritarian structure and patriarchal authority that is rationalia you could leave,I mean we have so plainly refused to implement forum wide changes to accommodate you .
You see, that is an example of exclusivity. Exclusivity is a basic tool of discipline in most christian churches. It is yet another example of the way that so many of you who call yourselves atheists are culturally and behaviourally steeped in the mechanisms of christianity. You confidently state "we have" with the same confidence as those who sing "we plough the fields and scatter" in Sunday church. But there is no "We". "We" have decided nothing, let alone refused anything, besides which I have not so far formally proposed a single democratic reform here anyway.
Bug you. Banishing trouble makers has been a tool of social control since prehistory, and the world across. Ancient Athenians (and I supposed other Greek cities) ostracized public men whom were feared might become public enemies. Pagan Norse banished killers and other criminals, either abroad for a limited time, or from all civilisation, with anybody finding them allowed to kill them without legal repercussions. This has nothing to do with christianity specifically.
I don't believe Feck was threatening to banish anyone. He simply suggested fucking off as one of a range of possible options. :tea:
A book is a version of the world. If you do not like it, ignore it; or offer your own version in return.
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing :nono:
Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41045
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: What were you before you became and atheist?

Post by Svartalf » Fri Oct 28, 2011 5:32 am

Robert_S wrote:It is a nice trolling tool, to associate everything you don't like with Christianity and/or theism.
By Eris Robert, I'm going to believe you're a christian. :biggrin:
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41045
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: What were you before you became and atheist?

Post by Svartalf » Fri Oct 28, 2011 5:35 am

Xamonas Chegwé wrote:
Svartalf wrote:
Exi5tentialist wrote:
Feck wrote:If you don't like it here under the authoritarian structure and patriarchal authority that is rationalia you could leave,I mean we have so plainly refused to implement forum wide changes to accommodate you .
You see, that is an example of exclusivity. Exclusivity is a basic tool of discipline in most christian churches. It is yet another example of the way that so many of you who call yourselves atheists are culturally and behaviourally steeped in the mechanisms of christianity. You confidently state "we have" with the same confidence as those who sing "we plough the fields and scatter" in Sunday church. But there is no "We". "We" have decided nothing, let alone refused anything, besides which I have not so far formally proposed a single democratic reform here anyway.
Bug you. Banishing trouble makers has been a tool of social control since prehistory, and the world across. Ancient Athenians (and I supposed other Greek cities) ostracized public men whom were feared might become public enemies. Pagan Norse banished killers and other criminals, either abroad for a limited time, or from all civilisation, with anybody finding them allowed to kill them without legal repercussions. This has nothing to do with christianity specifically.
I don't believe Feck was threatening to banish anyone. He simply suggested fucking off as one of a range of possible options. :tea:
any guy who keeps hounds is a social and ideological danger and needs to be exiled, or at least shunned.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests