response to emerging independent science on the 9/11 attacks

Post Reply
Trolldor
Gargling with Nails
Posts: 15878
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 5:57 am
Contact:

Re: response to emerging independent science on the 9/11 att

Post by Trolldor » Sat May 01, 2010 3:13 pm

WRONG! It's a missile design based off thunder bird 1.
"The fact is that far more crime and child abuse has been committed by zealots in the name of God, Jesus and Mohammed than has ever been committed in the name of Satan. Many people don't like that statement but few can argue with it."

User avatar
Cunt
Lumpy Vagina Bloodfart
Posts: 19069
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 3:10 am
Contact:

Re: response to emerging independent science on the 9/11 att

Post by Cunt » Sat May 01, 2010 3:32 pm

I have asked Galaxian several times what it would take for him to change his mind. Have you noticed his answer?


I think he just loves thinking he is the only one with the Truth[sup]TM[/sup] so much that he can't bear even the thought that he is wrong.

Can't even entertain it.
Shit, Piss, Cock, Cunt, Motherfucker, Cocksucker and Tits.
-various artists


Joe wrote:
Wed Nov 29, 2023 1:22 pm
he doesn't communicate
Free speech anywhere, is a threat to tyrants everywhere.

Trolldor
Gargling with Nails
Posts: 15878
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 5:57 am
Contact:

Re: response to emerging independent science on the 9/11 att

Post by Trolldor » Sat May 01, 2010 3:35 pm

Actually, the sheer stupidity displayed in the posts leads me to believe that he's putting on a show.
"The fact is that far more crime and child abuse has been committed by zealots in the name of God, Jesus and Mohammed than has ever been committed in the name of Satan. Many people don't like that statement but few can argue with it."

User avatar
Xamonas Chegwé
Bouncer
Bouncer
Posts: 50939
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:23 pm
About me: I have prehensile eyebrows.
I speak 9 languages fluently, one of which other people can also speak.
When backed into a corner, I fit perfectly - having a right-angled arse.
Location: Nottingham UK
Contact:

Re: response to emerging independent science on the 9/11 att

Post by Xamonas Chegwé » Sat May 01, 2010 3:36 pm

born-again-atheist wrote:Actually, the sheer stupidity displayed in the posts leads me to believe that he's putting on a show.
Is he Mandy? :hehe:
A book is a version of the world. If you do not like it, ignore it; or offer your own version in return.
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing :nono:
Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur

User avatar
Ian
Mr Incredible
Posts: 16975
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:42 pm
Location: Washington DC

Re: response to emerging independent science on the 9/11 att

Post by Ian » Sat May 01, 2010 3:56 pm

born-again-atheist wrote:Actually, the sheer stupidity displayed in the posts leads me to believe that he's putting on a show.
He's not putting on a show. I read his posts for two years at RDF. I have no doubt that 1) not only does he genuinely believe the stuff he's writing, 2) he looks down on the rest of us for not being able to see what is so clearly in front of him. Through his own paranoia and prodigious cynicism, he is able to deduce the Truth, whereas we are all just sheep.

User avatar
amused
amused
Posts: 3873
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:04 pm
About me: Reinvention phase initiated
Contact:

Re: response to emerging independent science on the 9/11 att

Post by amused » Sat May 01, 2010 4:00 pm

I just skimmed the article. It goes on about 'nano-thermite' being found in the dust of the debris. I'm an architect. Fire protection is a big part of what we do. Contrary to what Rosie O'Donnell says, steel will easily deform in the heat of a fire in a building. So we cover it up with lots of protective materials, like sheetrock and spray-on fireproofing, which is why you don't see it much in most buildings.

It would be very obvious to everybody if someone was methodically going through those towers floor by floor and removing that material covering the steel and installing 'nano-thermite', or whatever.

User avatar
Feck
.
.
Posts: 28391
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:25 pm
Contact:

Re: response to emerging independent science on the 9/11 att

Post by Feck » Sat May 01, 2010 4:30 pm

Tom Wood wrote:I just skimmed the article. It goes on about 'nano-thermite' being found in the dust of the debris. I'm an architect. Fire protection is a big part of what we do. Contrary to what Rosie O'Donnell says, steel will easily deform in the heat of a fire in a building. So we cover it up with lots of protective materials, like sheetrock and spray-on fireproofing, which is why you don't see it much in most buildings.

It would be very obvious to everybody if someone was methodically going through those towers floor by floor and removing that material covering the steel and installing 'nano-thermite', or whatever.

If you had ANY rust and you hit it with say a hot mixture of Aluminium and Magnesium wouldn't that make up well..... thermite ?

What are -Planes made of again ?

and what is Nano-Thermite ??????
:hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog:
Give me the wine , I don't need the bread

Trolldor
Gargling with Nails
Posts: 15878
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 5:57 am
Contact:

Re: response to emerging independent science on the 9/11 att

Post by Trolldor » Sat May 01, 2010 4:38 pm

Feck wrote:
Tom Wood wrote:I just skimmed the article. It goes on about 'nano-thermite' being found in the dust of the debris. I'm an architect. Fire protection is a big part of what we do. Contrary to what Rosie O'Donnell says, steel will easily deform in the heat of a fire in a building. So we cover it up with lots of protective materials, like sheetrock and spray-on fireproofing, which is why you don't see it much in most buildings.

It would be very obvious to everybody if someone was methodically going through those towers floor by floor and removing that material covering the steel and installing 'nano-thermite', or whatever.

If you had ANY rust and you hit it with say a hot mixture of Aluminium and Magnesium wouldn't that make up well..... thermite ?

What are -Planes made of again ?

and what is Nano-Thermite ??????
The really tiny kind?
"The fact is that far more crime and child abuse has been committed by zealots in the name of God, Jesus and Mohammed than has ever been committed in the name of Satan. Many people don't like that statement but few can argue with it."

User avatar
Feck
.
.
Posts: 28391
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:25 pm
Contact:

Re: response to emerging independent science on the 9/11 att

Post by Feck » Sat May 01, 2010 4:44 pm

born-again-atheist wrote:
Feck wrote:
Tom Wood wrote:I just skimmed the article. It goes on about 'nano-thermite' being found in the dust of the debris. I'm an architect. Fire protection is a big part of what we do. Contrary to what Rosie O'Donnell says, steel will easily deform in the heat of a fire in a building. So we cover it up with lots of protective materials, like sheetrock and spray-on fireproofing, which is why you don't see it much in most buildings.

It would be very obvious to everybody if someone was methodically going through those towers floor by floor and removing that material covering the steel and installing 'nano-thermite', or whatever.

If you had ANY rust and you hit it with say a hot mixture of Aluminium and Magnesium wouldn't that make up well..... thermite ?

What are -Planes made of again ?

and what is Nano-Thermite ??????
The really tiny kind?

Oh I just read the Wiki page and found another "firework" mixture :ccl: thank you Truthers :lol:
:hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog:
Give me the wine , I don't need the bread

User avatar
Randydeluxe
Filled With Aloha
Posts: 642
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 7:01 am
About me: Ua mau ke ea o ka 'aina i ka pono.
Location: SoCal. Previously Honolulu, HI. Previously Vancouver, BC. Sometimes Austin, TX.
Contact:

Re: response to emerging independent science on the 9/11 att

Post by Randydeluxe » Sat May 01, 2010 10:18 pm

Ian wrote:You really are lost in your own little world, huh?

This forum would be perfectly happy to have you go away. Please consider it a suggestion.
When you read Galaxian's assertions, and every single one of them turns out to be something that was thoroughly disproved so many years ago, I think it's reasonable to conclude that he's a kid who has only recently been reading this stuff, and doesn't have the shared experience of the millions of us who watched it all unfold with our own eyes and ears on that day.

As I've said before, this is only going to get worse. As time goes on, more and more people who desperately want to be privy to special information (that they can make-believe the majority don't know or understand) are going to seek out evidence for something alternate to the history we experienced. And they're going to find millions of hours of these fictional videos on Youtube, and billions of words written by "truthers" that bear no relation to the reality of the day, and it is going to capture them.

It's a sad prospect for us.

User avatar
Ian
Mr Incredible
Posts: 16975
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:42 pm
Location: Washington DC

Re: response to emerging independent science on the 9/11 att

Post by Ian » Sat May 01, 2010 11:16 pm

Randydeluxe wrote:
Ian wrote:You really are lost in your own little world, huh?

This forum would be perfectly happy to have you go away. Please consider it a suggestion.
When you read Galaxian's assertions, and every single one of them turns out to be something that was thoroughly disproved so many years ago, I think it's reasonable to conclude that he's a kid who has only recently been reading this stuff, and doesn't have the shared experience of the millions of us who watched it all unfold with our own eyes and ears on that day.
He's not very rational, but he's no kid. To my knowledge, he's a 40-something engineer in Australia.


Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: response to emerging independent science on the 9/11 att

Post by Coito ergo sum » Mon May 03, 2010 12:07 pm

Galaxian wrote:
Ian wrote:We need a "tin-foil hat" smilie. :roll:
Galaxian, you have your theories. I know actual people who were inside the Pentagon when it was hit. It. Was. A. Plane.
They way the towers fell is very simple: a Class Bravo fire turned into a Class Delta fire. Once that happened, collapse was inevitable.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxNy5zzbyL4
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxNy5zzbyL4

"There comes a time when silence is betrayal". Martin Luther King.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b80Bsw0UG-U
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b80Bsw0UG-U :eddy:

After this, I'm starting to wonder if you're just not playing around. You can't be serious.

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: response to emerging independent science on the 9/11 att

Post by Coito ergo sum » Mon May 03, 2010 12:12 pm

Randydeluxe wrote:
Ian wrote:You really are lost in your own little world, huh?

This forum would be perfectly happy to have you go away. Please consider it a suggestion.
When you read Galaxian's assertions, and every single one of them turns out to be something that was thoroughly disproved so many years ago, I think it's reasonable to conclude that he's a kid who has only recently been reading this stuff, and doesn't have the shared experience of the millions of us who watched it all unfold with our own eyes and ears on that day.

As I've said before, this is only going to get worse. As time goes on, more and more people who desperately want to be privy to special information (that they can make-believe the majority don't know or understand) are going to seek out evidence for something alternate to the history we experienced. And they're going to find millions of hours of these fictional videos on Youtube, and billions of words written by "truthers" that bear no relation to the reality of the day, and it is going to capture them.

It's a sad prospect for us.

Very true. It amazes me that 9/11/01 is almost 9 years ago. To me, it is an event burned into my memory, and will for a long time seem as if it just happened just a short time ago.

Now, however, the new class of freshman college kids this September were 8 or 9 when the towers went down. They view event as something from the distant past. It is not a current event to them, and it is almost surreal to them. So, what we will get in the next 10 years is a historical revisiting of the events, and there will be a growing movement like the alien abduction folks....

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: response to emerging independent science on the 9/11 att

Post by Coito ergo sum » Mon May 03, 2010 12:24 pm

Galaxian wrote:
born-again-atheist wrote:Simple point in fact - What happened to the plane and crew that were supposed to hit the pentagon if they did, in fact, not hit the pentagon?
Really guys! No sooner than my having cautioned you against blase ignorant remarks based on lack of attention & dedication to study, than you're at it again. Tut tut :mod:
Silly comments/questions such as: "there's no photo of a cruise missile" (well the 5 lousy frames indicate a missile more than an invisible plane).
Dozens of witnesses saw a plane; nobody saw a cruise missile.
The forensic evidence pointed to a plane; no forensic evidence pointed to a missile.
Galaxian wrote:
Or, "where did the plane & passengers go?" duh! give you 3 guesses, starting now.
Guessing is not productive.
Galaxian wrote:
Don't you read posts & links? :dono:
By the way Clinton; enough of your piss taking, it betrays a lack of deep contemplation of the issue. The reason we don't see either a plane, missile, or flying saucer hitting the Pentagon is because the video surveillance was stolen....all 83 tapes.
Link? Citation? Some proof?
Galaxian wrote:
THAT is the admission of guilt from the FBI.
Not an admission.
Galaxian wrote:
Any but the most biased mind can clearly see that criminals try to cover their tracks. :coffee:
Many criminals try to cover their tracks, true. However, there is still a mountain of evidence demonstrating that a plane hit the Pentagon which was full of people, and that the plane was flight 77. Many of the passengers mushy remnants were discovered, the black boxes were discovered, pieces of the plane were found there, independent witnesses saw the plane flying toward the building, etc.

There is no evidence for your assertion, there has been no "admission."

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests