response to emerging independent science on the 9/11 attacks
Re: response to emerging independent science on the 9/11 att
WRONG! It's a missile design based off thunder bird 1.
"The fact is that far more crime and child abuse has been committed by zealots in the name of God, Jesus and Mohammed than has ever been committed in the name of Satan. Many people don't like that statement but few can argue with it."
Re: response to emerging independent science on the 9/11 att
I have asked Galaxian several times what it would take for him to change his mind. Have you noticed his answer?
I think he just loves thinking he is the only one with the Truth[sup]TM[/sup] so much that he can't bear even the thought that he is wrong.
Can't even entertain it.
I think he just loves thinking he is the only one with the Truth[sup]TM[/sup] so much that he can't bear even the thought that he is wrong.
Can't even entertain it.
Re: response to emerging independent science on the 9/11 att
Actually, the sheer stupidity displayed in the posts leads me to believe that he's putting on a show.
"The fact is that far more crime and child abuse has been committed by zealots in the name of God, Jesus and Mohammed than has ever been committed in the name of Satan. Many people don't like that statement but few can argue with it."
- Xamonas Chegwé
- Bouncer
- Posts: 50939
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:23 pm
- About me: I have prehensile eyebrows.
I speak 9 languages fluently, one of which other people can also speak.
When backed into a corner, I fit perfectly - having a right-angled arse. - Location: Nottingham UK
- Contact:
Re: response to emerging independent science on the 9/11 att
Is he Mandy?born-again-atheist wrote:Actually, the sheer stupidity displayed in the posts leads me to believe that he's putting on a show.

A book is a version of the world. If you do not like it, ignore it; or offer your own version in return.
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing
Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing

Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur
Re: response to emerging independent science on the 9/11 att
He's not putting on a show. I read his posts for two years at RDF. I have no doubt that 1) not only does he genuinely believe the stuff he's writing, 2) he looks down on the rest of us for not being able to see what is so clearly in front of him. Through his own paranoia and prodigious cynicism, he is able to deduce the Truth, whereas we are all just sheep.born-again-atheist wrote:Actually, the sheer stupidity displayed in the posts leads me to believe that he's putting on a show.
- amused
- amused
- Posts: 3873
- Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:04 pm
- About me: Reinvention phase initiated
- Contact:
Re: response to emerging independent science on the 9/11 att
I just skimmed the article. It goes on about 'nano-thermite' being found in the dust of the debris. I'm an architect. Fire protection is a big part of what we do. Contrary to what Rosie O'Donnell says, steel will easily deform in the heat of a fire in a building. So we cover it up with lots of protective materials, like sheetrock and spray-on fireproofing, which is why you don't see it much in most buildings.
It would be very obvious to everybody if someone was methodically going through those towers floor by floor and removing that material covering the steel and installing 'nano-thermite', or whatever.
It would be very obvious to everybody if someone was methodically going through those towers floor by floor and removing that material covering the steel and installing 'nano-thermite', or whatever.
Re: response to emerging independent science on the 9/11 att
Tom Wood wrote:I just skimmed the article. It goes on about 'nano-thermite' being found in the dust of the debris. I'm an architect. Fire protection is a big part of what we do. Contrary to what Rosie O'Donnell says, steel will easily deform in the heat of a fire in a building. So we cover it up with lots of protective materials, like sheetrock and spray-on fireproofing, which is why you don't see it much in most buildings.
It would be very obvious to everybody if someone was methodically going through those towers floor by floor and removing that material covering the steel and installing 'nano-thermite', or whatever.
If you had ANY rust and you hit it with say a hot mixture of Aluminium and Magnesium wouldn't that make up well..... thermite ?
What are -Planes made of again ?
and what is Nano-Thermite ??????




Give me the wine , I don't need the bread
Re: response to emerging independent science on the 9/11 att
The really tiny kind?Feck wrote:Tom Wood wrote:I just skimmed the article. It goes on about 'nano-thermite' being found in the dust of the debris. I'm an architect. Fire protection is a big part of what we do. Contrary to what Rosie O'Donnell says, steel will easily deform in the heat of a fire in a building. So we cover it up with lots of protective materials, like sheetrock and spray-on fireproofing, which is why you don't see it much in most buildings.
It would be very obvious to everybody if someone was methodically going through those towers floor by floor and removing that material covering the steel and installing 'nano-thermite', or whatever.
If you had ANY rust and you hit it with say a hot mixture of Aluminium and Magnesium wouldn't that make up well..... thermite ?
What are -Planes made of again ?
and what is Nano-Thermite ??????
"The fact is that far more crime and child abuse has been committed by zealots in the name of God, Jesus and Mohammed than has ever been committed in the name of Satan. Many people don't like that statement but few can argue with it."
Re: response to emerging independent science on the 9/11 att
born-again-atheist wrote:The really tiny kind?Feck wrote:Tom Wood wrote:I just skimmed the article. It goes on about 'nano-thermite' being found in the dust of the debris. I'm an architect. Fire protection is a big part of what we do. Contrary to what Rosie O'Donnell says, steel will easily deform in the heat of a fire in a building. So we cover it up with lots of protective materials, like sheetrock and spray-on fireproofing, which is why you don't see it much in most buildings.
It would be very obvious to everybody if someone was methodically going through those towers floor by floor and removing that material covering the steel and installing 'nano-thermite', or whatever.
If you had ANY rust and you hit it with say a hot mixture of Aluminium and Magnesium wouldn't that make up well..... thermite ?
What are -Planes made of again ?
and what is Nano-Thermite ??????
Oh I just read the Wiki page and found another "firework" mixture






Give me the wine , I don't need the bread
- Randydeluxe
- Filled With Aloha
- Posts: 642
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 7:01 am
- About me: Ua mau ke ea o ka 'aina i ka pono.
- Location: SoCal. Previously Honolulu, HI. Previously Vancouver, BC. Sometimes Austin, TX.
- Contact:
Re: response to emerging independent science on the 9/11 att
When you read Galaxian's assertions, and every single one of them turns out to be something that was thoroughly disproved so many years ago, I think it's reasonable to conclude that he's a kid who has only recently been reading this stuff, and doesn't have the shared experience of the millions of us who watched it all unfold with our own eyes and ears on that day.Ian wrote:You really are lost in your own little world, huh?
This forum would be perfectly happy to have you go away. Please consider it a suggestion.
As I've said before, this is only going to get worse. As time goes on, more and more people who desperately want to be privy to special information (that they can make-believe the majority don't know or understand) are going to seek out evidence for something alternate to the history we experienced. And they're going to find millions of hours of these fictional videos on Youtube, and billions of words written by "truthers" that bear no relation to the reality of the day, and it is going to capture them.
It's a sad prospect for us.
Re: response to emerging independent science on the 9/11 att
He's not very rational, but he's no kid. To my knowledge, he's a 40-something engineer in Australia.Randydeluxe wrote:When you read Galaxian's assertions, and every single one of them turns out to be something that was thoroughly disproved so many years ago, I think it's reasonable to conclude that he's a kid who has only recently been reading this stuff, and doesn't have the shared experience of the millions of us who watched it all unfold with our own eyes and ears on that day.Ian wrote:You really are lost in your own little world, huh?
This forum would be perfectly happy to have you go away. Please consider it a suggestion.
-
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: response to emerging independent science on the 9/11 att
Galaxian wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxNy5zzbyL4Ian wrote:We need a "tin-foil hat" smilie.![]()
Galaxian, you have your theories. I know actual people who were inside the Pentagon when it was hit. It. Was. A. Plane.
They way the towers fell is very simple: a Class Bravo fire turned into a Class Delta fire. Once that happened, collapse was inevitable.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxNy5zzbyL4
"There comes a time when silence is betrayal". Martin Luther King.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b80Bsw0UG-U
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b80Bsw0UG-U
After this, I'm starting to wonder if you're just not playing around. You can't be serious.
-
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: response to emerging independent science on the 9/11 att
Randydeluxe wrote:When you read Galaxian's assertions, and every single one of them turns out to be something that was thoroughly disproved so many years ago, I think it's reasonable to conclude that he's a kid who has only recently been reading this stuff, and doesn't have the shared experience of the millions of us who watched it all unfold with our own eyes and ears on that day.Ian wrote:You really are lost in your own little world, huh?
This forum would be perfectly happy to have you go away. Please consider it a suggestion.
As I've said before, this is only going to get worse. As time goes on, more and more people who desperately want to be privy to special information (that they can make-believe the majority don't know or understand) are going to seek out evidence for something alternate to the history we experienced. And they're going to find millions of hours of these fictional videos on Youtube, and billions of words written by "truthers" that bear no relation to the reality of the day, and it is going to capture them.
It's a sad prospect for us.
Very true. It amazes me that 9/11/01 is almost 9 years ago. To me, it is an event burned into my memory, and will for a long time seem as if it just happened just a short time ago.
Now, however, the new class of freshman college kids this September were 8 or 9 when the towers went down. They view event as something from the distant past. It is not a current event to them, and it is almost surreal to them. So, what we will get in the next 10 years is a historical revisiting of the events, and there will be a growing movement like the alien abduction folks....
-
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: response to emerging independent science on the 9/11 att
Dozens of witnesses saw a plane; nobody saw a cruise missile.Galaxian wrote:Really guys! No sooner than my having cautioned you against blase ignorant remarks based on lack of attention & dedication to study, than you're at it again. Tut tutborn-again-atheist wrote:Simple point in fact - What happened to the plane and crew that were supposed to hit the pentagon if they did, in fact, not hit the pentagon?
Silly comments/questions such as: "there's no photo of a cruise missile" (well the 5 lousy frames indicate a missile more than an invisible plane).
The forensic evidence pointed to a plane; no forensic evidence pointed to a missile.
Guessing is not productive.Galaxian wrote:
Or, "where did the plane & passengers go?" duh! give you 3 guesses, starting now.
Link? Citation? Some proof?Galaxian wrote:
Don't you read posts & links?
By the way Clinton; enough of your piss taking, it betrays a lack of deep contemplation of the issue. The reason we don't see either a plane, missile, or flying saucer hitting the Pentagon is because the video surveillance was stolen....all 83 tapes.
Not an admission.Galaxian wrote:
THAT is the admission of guilt from the FBI.
Many criminals try to cover their tracks, true. However, there is still a mountain of evidence demonstrating that a plane hit the Pentagon which was full of people, and that the plane was flight 77. Many of the passengers mushy remnants were discovered, the black boxes were discovered, pieces of the plane were found there, independent witnesses saw the plane flying toward the building, etc.Galaxian wrote:
Any but the most biased mind can clearly see that criminals try to cover their tracks.
There is no evidence for your assertion, there has been no "admission."
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests