Tarot III Mafia: Game Thread

[Magicziggy]

Gonzo, what do you think about lynching Aza or DP?

[charlou]

##vote ksen##

MZ why should ksen be mayor?

To get people talking of course. And to get ksen in the game. He's not exactly a prolific poster. People should talk about him.

Why lynch him? That question goed to Charlou as well.

Your mayor vote was suspicious because you gave no reasoning. The same is true for charlou's mayor vote for you (MZ), Zig's mayor vote for UT, and Feck's mayor vote for Aza.

Not to mention lynch votes and what I haven't read yet.

re the bit I've bolded ... Why did you initially say "awesome" directly after MZ's vote post?

[Gonzo]

wow MZ I am amazed at all the FOSes you have thrown at me.

[charlou]

At the start of the game there is no reason to vote.
If I gave a reason other than to get people talking it would be bullshit.

It's not like you'd admit to mayor voting your don.

[Gonzo]

because this game is awesome. Oblivion is the Queen of Mafia.

[Magicziggy]

At the start of the game there is no reason to vote.
If I gave a reason other than to get people talking it would be bullshit.

It's not like you'd admit to mayor voting your don.

FOS this shit

[charlou]

The timing stood out on a reread, but I can buy that it was a 'checking in' style post. Curious that you didn't comment on MZ's vote post until much later in the day, though.

[Magicziggy]

wow MZ I am amazed at all the FOSes you have thrown at me.

Are you?

Actually my vote on you is to have a bandwagon that will create some talking points.
I have stated that I have no reason to believe anyone is more scummy than anyone else at the moment. You included.

[charlou]

At the start of the game there is no reason to vote.
If I gave a reason other than to get people talking it would be bullshit.

It's not like you'd admit to mayor voting your don.

FOS this shit

It's the first thing I thought when I read your post. Just telling it as I saw it.

[charlou]

More input from Athene and Zigmen would be good ... seeing as you're both about atm.

[amok]

Athene, I'm struggling here, as I assume many of us do on Day One, but I'll ask why you asked me if I'd Mayor vote DP based on that gamblers' fallacy thing, when (in my opinion) I posted that it had simply crossed my mind, and I moved on. It's not like there are a gazillion posts on this thread, to confuse issues and posts.

I'm not confused. I knew what I was asking and to whom. I asked you to engage you in discussion over a post which stood out to me.

Hm. No, still not getting it. I made a mention of thinking the odds were against DP being Scum again, but also didn't act on that, because it lacked logic. But you still asked, AS IF I HAD DONE, why I'd Mayor-vote based on the gamblers' fallacy.

My hackles are up. You're either very distracted, or something else.

[Gonzo]

At the start of the game there is no reason to vote.
If I gave a reason other than to get people talking it would be bullshit.

Not true. There are plenty of good reasons to mayor vote someone, you gave none. Not very helpful of you.

[charlou]

The timing stood out on a reread, but I can buy that it was a 'checking in' style post. Curious that you didn't comment on MZ's vote post until much later in the day, though.

That was to Gonzo.

Why didn't you comment on MZ's vote post until much later in the day, Gonzo?

[Magicziggy]

At the start of the game there is no reason to vote.
If I gave a reason other than to get people talking it would be bullshit.

It's not like you'd admit to mayor voting your don.

FOS this shit

It's the first thing I thought when I read your post. Just telling it as I saw it.

Then read it the way it was intended.
People are scared to make off the bat votes and posts and potentially to get people talking about them.
But that is exactly what this game needs.

[charlou]

Athene, I'm struggling here, as I assume many of us do on Day One, but I'll ask why you asked me if I'd Mayor vote DP based on that gamblers' fallacy thing, when (in my opinion) I posted that it had simply crossed my mind, and I moved on. It's not like there are a gazillion posts on this thread, to confuse issues and posts.

I'm not confused. I knew what I was asking and to whom. I asked you to engage you in discussion over a post which stood out to me.

Hm. No, still not getting it. I made a mention of thinking the odds were against DP being Scum again, but also didn't act on that, because it lacked logic. But you still asked, AS IF I HAD DONE, why I'd Mayor-vote based on the gamblers' fallacy.

My hackles are up. You're either very distracted, or something else.

I'm not sure who's been making the bigger deal about this .. Amok or Athene. MZ, what do you make of it?