Uninsured Father Dies of Toothache

[Schneibster]

I'll deal with any muggers I encounter myself, thanks,

Typical Libertard. a) You're not a little old lady,

That's why Samuel Colt referred to the Colt Peacemaker as "the Great Equalizer."

And that "proves" your point, right?

Why yes, yes it does.

No, it doesn't. The little old lady's hand isn't strong enough to handle a gun, her eye's not sharp enough, her hand shakes so she'll always miss. It's not an equalizer, it's a burden that civilized people don't want to carry.

Grow up.

[Seth]

No, it doesn't. The little old lady's hand isn't strong enough to handle a gun, her eye's not sharp enough, her hand shakes so she'll always miss. It's not an equalizer, it's a burden that civilized people don't want to carry.

Grow up.

Hordes of little old ladies who have successfully plugged bad guys disagree. I'll take their word for it over the word of someone who obviously doesn't have a fucking clue about firearms or their proper use.

Here's but one example that took me about five seconds to find, you can go to the link and search for as many more as you care, or have the intellectual courage, to read:

The State Times, Baton Rouge, LA, 3/15/89
State: LA
American Rifleman Issue: 6/1/1989
A man broke into the Baton Rouge, La., home of an 80-year-old woman and her 76-year-old cousin. The intruder first beat and seriously injured the cousin with a cement block, and when the burglar was discovered by the homeowner, he stabbed her with an icepick. The elderly woman was able to grab her loaded revolver from under a pillow and shoot the attacker, critically wounding him and halting further assault.

[Schneibster]

No, it doesn't. The little old lady's hand isn't strong enough to handle a gun, her eye's not sharp enough, her hand shakes so she'll always miss. It's not an equalizer, it's a burden that civilized people don't want to carry.

Grow up.

Hordes of little old ladies who have successfully plugged bad guys disagree.

Proves nothing, and that's assuming you can produce evidence which I highly doubt. You're ignoring the ones who can't, typical Libertardian.

ETA: not to mention, sorry, I don't wanna live in a society where little old ladies have to carry guns, which is apparently your preferred society.

Grow up.

[Seth]

No, it doesn't. The little old lady's hand isn't strong enough to handle a gun, her eye's not sharp enough, her hand shakes so she'll always miss. It's not an equalizer, it's a burden that civilized people don't want to carry.

Grow up.

Hordes of little old ladies who have successfully plugged bad guys disagree.

Proves nothing, and that's assuming you can produce evidence which I highly doubt. You're ignoring the ones who can't, typical Libertardian.

Grow up.

So, all the ones who CAN successfully defend themselves with a handgun, from children to little old ladies and everyone in between, should be denied the ability to do so merely because some little old ladies cannot do so? How fucking retarded is that so-called reasoning?

And you can go look up the story in The State Times, Baton Rouge, LA, 3/15/89, yourself. I provided the citation, do your own homework.

And...fuck you.

[Seth]

ETA: not to mention, sorry, I don't wanna live in a society where little old ladies have to carry guns, which is apparently your preferred society.

Then you'd better go slit your belly and kill yourself, because you're already there. Have been roughly since homo sap. began walking upright.

[Exi5tentialist]

ETA: not to mention, sorry, I don't wanna live in a society where little old ladies have to carry guns, which is apparently your preferred society.

Then you'd better go slit your belly and kill yourself, because you're already there. Have been roughly since homo sap. began walking upright.

The species homo sapiens has always walked upright. And the earliest older females did not carry guns.

[Schneibster]

No, it doesn't. The little old lady's hand isn't strong enough to handle a gun, her eye's not sharp enough, her hand shakes so she'll always miss. It's not an equalizer, it's a burden that civilized people don't want to carry.

Grow up.

Hordes of little old ladies who have successfully plugged bad guys disagree.

Proves nothing, and that's assuming you can produce evidence which I highly doubt. You're ignoring the ones who can't, typical Libertardian.

Grow up.

So, all the ones who CAN successfully defend themselves with a handgun, from children to little old ladies and everyone in between, should be denied the ability to do so merely because some little old ladies cannot do so? How fucking retarded is that so-called reasoning?

Lie. Nobody's denying anybody anything.

And you can go look up the story in The State Times, Baton Rouge, LA, 3/15/89, yourself. I provided the citation, do your own homework.

One is not a horde. Lie number two.

And...fuck you.

The last refuge of the Libertard.

Grow up.

[Seth]

ETA: not to mention, sorry, I don't wanna live in a society where little old ladies have to carry guns, which is apparently your preferred society.

Then you'd better go slit your belly and kill yourself, because you're already there. Have been roughly since homo sap. began walking upright.

The species homo sapiens has always walked upright. And the earliest older females did not carry guns.

I didn't say they did, I said they had to. Unfortunately for them, all they had at the time were clubs. Still, a "great equalizer" would have proved useful, had one been available. And since they are widely available, it's in everyone's interest that law-abiding citizens carry one for personal defense, defense of the family, and defense of the community.

Do learn to read more carefully, youngster.

[Schneibster]

ETA: not to mention, sorry, I don't wanna live in a society where little old ladies have to carry guns, which is apparently your preferred society.

Then you'd better go slit your belly and kill yourself, because you're already there. Have been roughly since homo sap. began walking upright.

Civilized people have police. Sorry you're having trouble with reality.

[Schneibster]

Seth, you haven't written a thing that took me longer than a moment's thought to respond to.

You're failing.

[Seth]

Hordes of little old ladies who have successfully plugged bad guys disagree.

Proves nothing, and that's assuming you can produce evidence which I highly doubt. You're ignoring the ones who can't, typical Libertardian.

Grow up.

So, all the ones who CAN successfully defend themselves with a handgun, from children to little old ladies and everyone in between, should be denied the ability to do so merely because some little old ladies cannot do so? How fucking retarded is that so-called reasoning? [/quote]Lie. Nobody's denying anybody anything. [/quote]

Lie. You're the one arguing for a disarmed society.

Oh, here's a little interpretational clue for you: that squiggly thing at the end of the first sentence is called a "question mark." It denotes that the preceding sentence was a question. In this case a rhetorical one (you can look up "rhetorical" yourself, I've provided the correct spelling for you since I'm sure it's an unfamiliar word to you) intended to point out the stupidity of your remarks. You were, after all, the one who claimed that I was "ignoring the ones who cant" when that's simply a mendacious deliberate mischaracterization and evasion.

And you can go look up the story in The State Times, Baton Rouge, LA, 3/15/89, yourself. I provided the citation, do your own homework.

One is not a horde. Lie number two.

You're the liar, because I never claimed it was. I did, however, refer you to a site where you can indeed find hordes of little old ladies successfully using their firearms to thwart crimes.

And...fuck you.

The last refuge of the Libertard.

Nah, just a little tit-for-tat insult.

Grow up.

You first.

[Seth]

Seth, you haven't written a thing that took me longer than a moment's thought to respond to.

You're failing.

That's pretty obvious from the infantile nature and quality of your responses. But you mistake me if you think I give a flying fuck what you think or have to say. I'm playing to a different audience, and your arguments are merely useful idiocy that I use to demonstrate the intellectual failings of the left.

See, the argument that little old ladies shouldn't have guns because they can't use them and always miss, which was your idiotic claim, is easy to debunk with actual evidence, which I provided. This demonstrates that your arguments are qualitatively ignorant and infantile, and that's my purpose in even bothering to respond to you. Your arguments are a prime example of the intellectual pygmyism of the hoplophobe left and I love showing them up for the foolishness and idiocy that they are.

It's really quite amusing, and your moronic arguments provide such wonderful entertainment. Thanks. Really.

[Schneibster]

Lie. You're the one arguing for a disarmed society.

Lie. You've never asked me (unless it was in a post where you lied or insulted me right off and I never read it) what my opinion is. You've already had one hint, and that hint is enough to tell you that it's a lie. The other choice is you're too stupid to have noticed it, which is viable considering you're stupid enough to think you know what I think without asking me.

[Schneibster]

Seth, you haven't written a thing that took me longer than a moment's thought to respond to.

You're failing.

That's pretty obvious from the infantile nature and quality of your responses.

First insult.

Insults are the refuge of the incompetent.

[Seth]

ETA: not to mention, sorry, I don't wanna live in a society where little old ladies have to carry guns, which is apparently your preferred society.

Then you'd better go slit your belly and kill yourself, because you're already there. Have been roughly since homo sap. began walking upright.

Civilized people have police. Sorry you're having trouble with reality.

Tell it to any of the billions of crime victims who were victimized when the police weren't around, as is ALWAYS the case.

If what you say were remotely true, there would be no crime victims. Obviously you're the one who is full of shit here, a fact that the billions of crime victims worldwide prove beyond any shadow of a doubt.

Anyone who thinks that the police are there (or are going to be there) to protect them from criminals are simply too stupid to be worthy of being protected by anyone. Society is better off without them.