Tea Party vs Zombie game thread

Mafia Forum is visible to guests. Please note that game threads are limited to posts by players who are involved in each game. Non-player or derail posts will be moved to a gallery thread.

Moderator: Mafia Mods

Post Reply
User avatar
Magicziggy
Posts: 4847
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:56 am
Contact:

Re: Tea Party vs Zombie Day 3

Post by Magicziggy » Sat Jul 23, 2011 12:54 pm

b.ternarius wrote:
Magicziggy wrote:No, the object is inconsequential. It only registered once, before I started playing.

Never mind. You have the info now. Do with it what you will.
Missing my point. Nothing in a role pm is inconsequential.
I didn't mean it not to register. It just didn't.
First game back in about 3 months, and I don't intend it to consume me like it used to.

User avatar
def
Posts: 110
Joined: Sat May 07, 2011 3:48 am
About me: def
Location: 北海道
Contact:

Re: Tea Party vs Zombie Day 3

Post by def » Sat Jul 23, 2011 1:10 pm

I haven't received any gifts.

I'm kind of stumped as to who to vote for, so I'm going to leave it for now, and go to bed soon. I should be up in plenty of time to make a decision on my vote.

User avatar
Mantisdreamz
Posts: 1826
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:01 am
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: Tea Party vs Zombie Day 3

Post by Mantisdreamz » Sat Jul 23, 2011 9:06 pm

I did have an object and it was stolen from me last night

i'm going to ##vote def## - but will be back before nightfall

User avatar
amok
Posts: 900
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2011 1:23 am
About me: Bearer of bad news.
Location: Nova Scotia
Contact:

Re: Tea Party vs Zombie Day 3

Post by amok » Sun Jul 24, 2011 12:02 am

OK, just thinking out loud here, so to speak.

1) The most likely alignment at the start was two Scum, one Indie, seven Town.

2) In a game of just 10 total, it seems logical that the Indie's win condition would be quite simple, but just surviving with either Town or Scum is too easy. It has to be stealing either a certain number of gifts or stealing a specific one.

3) It's probably more important today to lynch the Indie, than the last Scum (another NK & we can still win - barely, but still possible), but another theft might net the Thief either the magic number or the magic item.

Does anyone see a problem with my logic? I'm posting this early, because I've been wrong as often as I've been right, and I'd like input.
It may be true that the law cannot make a man love me, but it can keep him from lynching me, and I think that's pretty important.
- Martin Luther King Jr.

User avatar
Feck
.
.
Posts: 28391
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Tea Party vs Zombie Day 3

Post by Feck » Sun Jul 24, 2011 12:10 am

Magicziggy wrote:
b.ternarius wrote:
Magicziggy wrote:No, the object is inconsequential. It only registered once, before I started playing.

Never mind. You have the info now. Do with it what you will.
Missing my point. Nothing in a role pm is inconsequential.
I didn't mean it not to register. It just didn't.
First game back in about 3 months, and I don't intend it to consume me like it used to.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kBQ2ZhN3 ... re=related[/youtube]
:hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog:
Give me the wine , I don't need the bread

User avatar
amok
Posts: 900
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2011 1:23 am
About me: Bearer of bad news.
Location: Nova Scotia
Contact:

Re: Tea Party vs Zombie Day 3

Post by amok » Sun Jul 24, 2011 12:20 am

Mantisdreamz wrote:I did have an object and it was stolen from me last night

i'm going to ##vote def## - but will be back before nightfall
Mantis, why Def? Is it the "crap shoot" comment that's bothering you, or is there something else?
It may be true that the law cannot make a man love me, but it can keep him from lynching me, and I think that's pretty important.
- Martin Luther King Jr.

User avatar
def
Posts: 110
Joined: Sat May 07, 2011 3:48 am
About me: def
Location: 北海道
Contact:

Re: Tea Party vs Zombie Day 3

Post by def » Sun Jul 24, 2011 12:23 am

Mantisdreamz wrote:I did have an object and it was stolen from me last night

i'm going to ##vote def## - but will be back before nightfall
Ridiculous. I'm assuming you just ignored the ideas in this post http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.p ... 16#p922516 You've been entirely unhelpful in this game so far.

##vote Mantis##

b.ternarius
Posts: 395
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Tea Party vs Zombie Day 3

Post by b.ternarius » Sun Jul 24, 2011 12:37 am

amok wrote:OK, just thinking out loud here, so to speak.

1) The most likely alignment at the start was two Scum, one Indie, seven Town.

2) In a game of just 10 total, it seems logical that the Indie's win condition would be quite simple, but just surviving with either Town or Scum is too easy. It has to be stealing either a certain number of gifts or stealing a specific one.

3) It's probably more important today to lynch the Indie, than the last Scum (another NK & we can still win - barely, but still possible), but another theft might net the Thief either the magic number or the magic item.

Does anyone see a problem with my logic? I'm posting this early, because I've been wrong as often as I've been right, and I'd like input.
Except it seems clear we have a Thief, and the role of Thief according to mafia wiki is ordinarily a town role. We don't want to lynch the thief. The object the thief is looking for may be important to town, not scum. That's why I gave the thief a hint about my object.

We need to lynch scum. I'm still seeing mz and def as scummy.

Def, besides accusing you, what other reason do you have for thinking mantis is scummy. Because just about everyone has questioned you, so why do you find her more scummy than the rest of us?

Why, for example, don't you find mz's absent-minded 'I forgot about the object' scummy? Because I do.

b.ternarius
Posts: 395
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Tea Party vs Zombie Day 3

Post by b.ternarius » Sun Jul 24, 2011 12:41 am

amok - yes - stolen
bt -yes
mz - yes
feck - no
def - no
mantis - yes - stolen

User avatar
def
Posts: 110
Joined: Sat May 07, 2011 3:48 am
About me: def
Location: 北海道
Contact:

Re: Tea Party vs Zombie Day 3

Post by def » Sun Jul 24, 2011 12:50 am

b.ternarius wrote:Def, besides accusing you, what other reason do you have for thinking mantis is scummy. Because just about everyone has questioned you, so why do you find her more scummy than the rest of us?

Why, for example, don't you find mz's absent-minded 'I forgot about the object' scummy? Because I do.
It goes back to day one. A number of the players here regularly play on the RS site, so that old 'crapshoot' comment should have meant nothing to them. I can accept that there are different mafia etiquette traditions here. Mantis made an issue of it though.

As for MZ, he was under no obligation to volunteer that information, and, though it could be a ploy, I think a scum player simply wouldn't bring it up. Are you assuming that he's lying about having the object?

b.ternarius
Posts: 395
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Tea Party vs Zombie Day 3

Post by b.ternarius » Sun Jul 24, 2011 12:52 am

current lynch votes

mantis - mz, -mz, def
def - mantis

User avatar
Mantisdreamz
Posts: 1826
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:01 am
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: Tea Party vs Zombie Day 3

Post by Mantisdreamz » Sun Jul 24, 2011 12:53 am

def wrote:
Mantisdreamz wrote:I did have an object and it was stolen from me last night

i'm going to ##vote def## - but will be back before nightfall
Ridiculous. I'm assuming you just ignored the ideas in this post http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.p ... 16#p922516 You've been entirely unhelpful in this game so far.

##vote Mantis##
Well just because you say something doesn't mean it's true -- this is mafia, where scum are supposed to lie you know.
amok wrote:
Mantisdreamz wrote:I did have an object and it was stolen from me last night

i'm going to ##vote def## - but will be back before nightfall
Mantis, why Def? Is it the "crap shoot" comment that's bothering you, or is there something else?
The reason is mostly because I'm getting more of a town read from you, b.t and Feck. So that leaves MZ and def.

Now, I could be completely wrong with my 'town reads' -- and i'll have to look over the days again, but this is the sense that I have gotten so far

User avatar
Magicziggy
Posts: 4847
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:56 am
Contact:

Tea Party vs Zombie Day 3

Post by Magicziggy » Sun Jul 24, 2011 12:57 am

I have feck as town. My oversight definitely pings. In my defense, talk of gifts did not help. My object is not a gift.

I have b.t. As town. It is too far fetched for her to have contrived the ksen bussing. I have her as the indie.

I have def as town. For the same reason as b.t.

I have amok as town. Just his posting style.

I have mantis as scum. Her vote on def is strange. Like she's afraid of leading a vote on me.
##vote:mantis##

I will also vote amok mayor but don't know how to do colour on this phone.

@@vote:amok@@

User avatar
Magicziggy
Posts: 4847
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:56 am
Contact:

Tea Party vs Zombie Day 3

Post by Magicziggy » Sun Jul 24, 2011 12:58 am

Cross post with mantis

b.ternarius
Posts: 395
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Tea Party vs Zombie Day 3

Post by b.ternarius » Sun Jul 24, 2011 12:59 am

def wrote:
b.ternarius wrote:Def, besides accusing you, what other reason do you have for thinking mantis is scummy. Because just about everyone has questioned you, so why do you find her more scummy than the rest of us?

Why, for example, don't you find mz's absent-minded 'I forgot about the object' scummy? Because I do.
It goes back to day one. A number of the players here regularly play on the RS site, so that old 'crapshoot' comment should have meant nothing to them. I can accept that there are different mafia etiquette traditions here. Mantis made an issue of it though.

As for MZ, he was under no obligation to volunteer that information, and, though it could be a ploy, I think a scum player simply wouldn't bring it up. Are you assuming that he's lying about having the object?
Mantis has played at TR a lot, where your crapshoot comment would have been notable. And also here, where I damn near got lynched first day of the Innsmouth game for blurting out something similar. So her seeing that as scummy is not a scum tell.

mz certainly didn't have to volunteer the information. It's his excuse for not volunteering it earlier that makes it look like he decided it would be townish to have an object and made a fumbling post about it. I'm not assuming it's a lie. I'm just pointing out that it is very odd, given the importance we have placed on the exact wording of role pms in this game, that mz would consider that part of the role pm as inconsequential enough to forget.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests