Tea Party vs Zombie game thread

[def]

Hmm, it's a tossup then between MZ and Mant for me... What to do, what to do...

[Magicziggy]

Why not feck?

[Feck]

Why not feck?

because it makes no sense! If I were scum I would have known he was town (and probably vanilla) why would I split the vote between two town players ? and then NK a player who others thought was suspicious ? it would make a lot more sense to leave him in the game as even if a Seer read him as town it would be easy to stir up Wifom about him possibly being the Don .

My first thoughts this morning are that scum may not be experienced scum players but It's a long day and accusations can wait maybe more information about Amok's mysterious 'gift' could surface and give us more info ...

[Mantisdreamz]

Mantis wasn't around when I changed my mind about VoFW. Possibly the move was in. But vofw's alignment is useful. Puts feck firmly into the idk column. He voted VoFW, thus making it a toss up between two town. Hmmm.....

##vote:mantis##

For now

i don't know MZ, you were the only one standing out to me. however -- you did mention that scum wasn't brought up in the pm, so that kind of looks good on you.

i'm really beginning to wonder if def was told by ksen to bus him. his opening vote on ksen about a crapshoot, still looks a bit off

i noticed in night chat from yesterday, b.t - you said that you're been naively going with Feck as town. I'm completely doing that too, and i'm hoping that is not a foolish move

[Magicziggy]

I don't think Feck's day 2 vote on VoFW clears him in any way. He's using it as a defence.

I can almost make a case for me as scum. I called ksen on his mistake but dithered about whether he could have made it. In the end I voted him and that appears to be what people have latched on to. Never mind.

My vote rationale was sound enough, as was my initial vote on def. ( in my mind) . Mantis seems more townish now she's backed off me a bit. In such a small game it's difficult to pick a standout. I can make cases for everyone. I think scum will be keen to see a vote go down and it gather some momentum. In the spirit of my continued dithering and the longer day ahead.
##unvote##

In the end I may have to fall back on a middle of the pack theory. Often I've noticed it's neither the most or least town in my mind that end up as the final culprit.

[b.ternarius]

Why not feck?

because it makes no sense! If I were scum I would have known he was town (and probably vanilla) why would I split the vote between two town players ? and then NK a player who others thought was suspicious ? it would make a lot more sense to leave him in the game as even if a Seer read him as town it would be easy to stir up Wifom about him possibly being the Don .

My first thoughts this morning are that scum may not be experienced scum players but It's a long day and accusations can wait maybe more information about Amok's mysterious 'gift' could surface and give us more info ...

I was thinking the same thing about an inexperienced and likely solitary scum. Vofw had a lot of suspicion on him and was very possibly going to be today's lynch. Why nk him? Why not take out a player who is more accepted as town?

Feck, def, mantis, do you have a gift/object?

@@vote amok@@

[Feck]

No nothing here

[b.ternarius]

Mantis wasn't around when I changed my mind about VoFW. Possibly the move was in. But vofw's alignment is useful. Puts feck firmly into the idk column. He voted VoFW, thus making it a toss up between two town. Hmmm.....

##vote:mantis##

For now

i don't know MZ, you were the only one standing out to me. however -- you did mention that scum wasn't brought up in the pm, so that kind of looks good on you.

i'm really beginning to wonder if def was told by ksen to bus him. his opening vote on ksen about a crapshoot, still looks a bit off

i noticed in night chat from yesterday, b.t - you said that you're been naively going with Feck as town. I'm completely doing that too, and i'm hoping that is not a foolish move

I'm pretty sure a scum Feck, an experienced player, would have nk'd you or amok or me, not vofw.

Yes, I've been holding in my mind that ksen would have told his scum companion to bus him soonest after him making a huge blunder. Which is why def is suspect. The previous night's kill of Athene may have been orchestrated by ksen well before his being lynched, he knows Athene has good scumdar.

Townish to scummish for me right now

amok
mantis
feck
def
mz

[b.ternarius]

Re gifts:

amok - yes - stolen
bt -yes
mz -no
feck - no

Thief failed to steal my 'I know what it isn't' object last night. that suggests to me that Thief is searching for something in particular - the thing that my object isn't - and so tried to steal from a player last night who did not have an object.

[Magicziggy]

shit, I do have an object.

It was so inconsequential I forgot about it completely. Put me down as a yes.

[b.ternarius]

shit, I do have an object.

It was so inconsequential I forgot about it completely. Put me down as a yes.

Huh?

Why would you not have read your pm again before answering 'no' yesterday? Or just said nothing at all if you wanted to with-hold the information?

amok - yes - stolen
bt -yes
mz - yes
feck - no

[Magicziggy]

Because I thought I had nothing. It was so inconsequential that I forgot about it completely. I did read my pm again when it came to sussing out VFW, but it didn;t even register then.

I could have kept quiet and not said anything now, but fact is, I do have an item.

[b.ternarius]

Okay, mz, but given the amount of importance the rest of us have been placing on careful reading of the role pms, I find it really weird that you thought possession of an object was 'inconsquential'.

[Magicziggy]

No, the object is inconsequential. It only registered once, before I started playing.

Never mind. You have the info now. Do with it what you will.

[b.ternarius]

No, the object is inconsequential. It only registered once, before I started playing.

Never mind. You have the info now. Do with it what you will.

Missing my point. Nothing in a role pm is inconsequential.