Starfleet Game thread
Moderator: Mafia Mods
Re: Starfleet Day 3
I have a question what was wrong with my post explaining I'm less likely to be around when Irre is as I don't live in OZ ?




Give me the wine , I don't need the bread
Re: Starfleet Day 3
does this mean you're feeling that irre is townish?ksen wrote:I have to go pick up my son and have dinner. be back before nightfall.
I've changed my mind and don't like a feck or ut lynch.
vote ade
Re: Starfleet Day 3
That's a bit random.ksen wrote:I have to go pick up my son and have dinner. be back before nightfall.
I've changed my mind and don't like a feck or ut lynch.
vote ade
Ignore me, I'm just here for the Mafia.
Re: Starfleet Day 3
vote mantis
hunch, mostly. Mantis waited until a few players started to soften before outing. In my experience, town players tend to out earlier than scum players. it's a long game day, but still, somewhat eudemonistical.
right now, I could go with Irre just as easily. Not sure what I think about Ade atm. But there is an old mafia chestnut. If you're going to out, out. don't half-out or soft-out.
hunch, mostly. Mantis waited until a few players started to soften before outing. In my experience, town players tend to out earlier than scum players. it's a long game day, but still, somewhat eudemonistical.
right now, I could go with Irre just as easily. Not sure what I think about Ade atm. But there is an old mafia chestnut. If you're going to out, out. don't half-out or soft-out.
- Mantisdreamz
- Posts: 1826
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:01 am
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Starfleet Day 3
how is it a soft out?oblivion wrote:vote mantis
hunch, mostly. Mantis waited until a few players started to soften before outing. In my experience, town players tend to out earlier than scum players. it's a long game day, but still, somewhat eudemonistical.
right now, I could go with Irre just as easily. Not sure what I think about Ade atm. But there is an old mafia chestnut. If you're going to out, out. don't half-out or soft-out.
Re: Starfleet Day 3
ambiguousnesses.
it's a character claim, not a role claim.
it's a character claim, not a role claim.
- Mantisdreamz
- Posts: 1826
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:01 am
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Starfleet Day 3
ok....oblivion wrote:ambiguousnesses.
it's a character claim, not a role claim.
- Mantisdreamz
- Posts: 1826
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:01 am
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Starfleet Day 3
you would rather the role be revealed?
- grit
- Posts: 389
- Joined: Sun May 22, 2011 3:13 am
- About me: Calvinistic Christian, wandering pilgrim, and all 'round very odd fellow.
- Location: The Confederacy
- Contact:
Re: Starfleet Day 3
ob,
There's been a ship load of deconstruction today. I can't tell if it's been helpful or harmful to town.
Do you lean toward favourability of the name and night action claims of both ksen and Mantis?
I'm inclined to fall back on earlier suspicions. I've read and re-read the days so much it's dizzying.
What do you think benefits town the most if we lynch someone who may or may not be a more obvious choice than another?
I mean, what lynch will reveal the most for town's benefit?
There's been a ship load of deconstruction today. I can't tell if it's been helpful or harmful to town.
Do you lean toward favourability of the name and night action claims of both ksen and Mantis?
I'm inclined to fall back on earlier suspicions. I've read and re-read the days so much it's dizzying.
What do you think benefits town the most if we lynch someone who may or may not be a more obvious choice than another?
I mean, what lynch will reveal the most for town's benefit?
Re: Starfleet Day 3
well if you are going to be lynched and you have a town role you should !Mantisdreamz wrote:you would rather the role be revealed?




Give me the wine , I don't need the bread
Re: Starfleet Day 3
What's going to be best for town? How do our specials prioritize the remaining outed players? and how can we get a counterclaim if you don't role claim. a name claime is simply that. and zigmen is sure to have given scum some safe names.
I'm quite likely tonight's kill, especially if scum tried to kill me last night and it failed due to protection/bus drivering. whatever other specials are hidden and in play can make better prioritizations of the outed townies and the uncleared players based on better information.
but I am way beyond sleep deprivation. Maybe I'm thinking inarticulately at this point.
I'm going to take a break from the game and try to clear my head a bit. I also need to catch a train. I'll be around in a bit.
maybe the other players can kick around what to do regarding your name claim.
unvote
I'm quite likely tonight's kill, especially if scum tried to kill me last night and it failed due to protection/bus drivering. whatever other specials are hidden and in play can make better prioritizations of the outed townies and the uncleared players based on better information.
but I am way beyond sleep deprivation. Maybe I'm thinking inarticulately at this point.
I'm going to take a break from the game and try to clear my head a bit. I also need to catch a train. I'll be around in a bit.
maybe the other players can kick around what to do regarding your name claim.
unvote
- Mantisdreamz
- Posts: 1826
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:01 am
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Starfleet Day 3
grit, I believe ksen's claim. It's just the popular option of why there was no night kill, kind of annoys me, since I know this is not the case.
If Ob was protected -- then fine. But, if the doc protected someone else, and there was no nk, than they will know that the person who they protected (if not Ob) is cleared, since they were targeted
hope that makes sense
it's just that this line of yours:
"Do you lean toward favourability of the name and night action claims of both ksen and Mantis? "
makes it seem like you are shedding suspicion on ksen and his claims for no reason
If Ob was protected -- then fine. But, if the doc protected someone else, and there was no nk, than they will know that the person who they protected (if not Ob) is cleared, since they were targeted
hope that makes sense
it's just that this line of yours:
"Do you lean toward favourability of the name and night action claims of both ksen and Mantis? "
makes it seem like you are shedding suspicion on ksen and his claims for no reason
Re: Starfleet Day 3
I believe ksen's claim with great affirmationisms. He already had my attention after yesterday.
I hope I have time to sort things out adequately.
vote irre in case I miss nightfall.
would still like ksen's thoughts about her given his vote on adenosine.
I hope I have time to sort things out adequately.
vote irre in case I miss nightfall.
would still like ksen's thoughts about her given his vote on adenosine.
Re: Starfleet Day 3
Explain the first bit I bolded ,How do you know ?Mantisdreamz wrote:grit, I believe ksen's claim. It's just the popular option of why there was no night kill, kind of annoys me, since I know this is not the case.
If Ob was protected -- then fine. But, if the doc protected someone else, and there was no nk, than they will know that the person who they protected (if not Ob) is cleared, since they were targeted
hope that makes sense
it's just that this line of yours:
"Do you lean toward favourability of the name and night action claims of both ksen and Mantis? "
makes it seem like you are shedding suspicion on ksen and his claims for no reason
and tell me again how the second bolded bit is not special hunting you seem to be asking not only for the doc to out but to say who they protected last night this information would be of great use to scum ?




Give me the wine , I don't need the bread
- grit
- Posts: 389
- Joined: Sun May 22, 2011 3:13 am
- About me: Calvinistic Christian, wandering pilgrim, and all 'round very odd fellow.
- Location: The Confederacy
- Contact:
Re: Starfleet Day 3
I hate for this to be a factor in a game, but is the particular time of day of Mantis' name claim revealing? I'm noticing it would have been morning down under, is that correct?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests