Speaking from an entirely impartial standpoint, you're wrong. I can tell even without really reading the whole of your post. You were born wrong, and you'll die wrong. Now say my name.pawiz wrote:I made the claim, from memory that the early Christians debated over the divinity of Jebus - i.e. not all agreed that he was the son of the big fella in the sky. This was something I had recalled from the back of my mind, and I vaguely remember watching a documentary about it.
And fairly the fucker has asked me to support my claim![]()
Google returns mostly apologetics sites and a couple of Wiki articles which do not help.
Does anyone have any knowledge of this subject and point me to references that will show I was not talking out of my ass (which of course I was).
Thanks
Arguing with a fundie - resource needed
- Chuck Jones
- Court Jester
- Posts: 1149
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 12:57 pm
Re: Arguing with a fundie - resource needed
- AshtonBlack
- Tech Monkey
- Posts: 7773
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 8:01 pm
- Location: <insert witty joke locaction here>
- Contact:
Re: Arguing with a fundie - resource needed
Chuck Jones wrote:Speaking from an entirely impartial standpoint, you're wrong. I can tell even without really reading the whole of your post. You were born wrong, and you'll die wrong. Now say my name.pawiz wrote:I made the claim, from memory that the early Christians debated over the divinity of Jebus - i.e. not all agreed that he was the son of the big fella in the sky. This was something I had recalled from the back of my mind, and I vaguely remember watching a documentary about it.
And fairly the fucker has asked me to support my claim![]()
Google returns mostly apologetics sites and a couple of Wiki articles which do not help.
Does anyone have any knowledge of this subject and point me to references that will show I was not talking out of my ass (which of course I was).
Thanks

10 Fuck Off
20 GOTO 10
Ashton Black wrote:"Dogma is the enemy, not religion, per se. Rationality, genuine empathy and intellectual integrity are anathema to dogma."
- maiforpeace
- Account Suspended at Member's Request
- Posts: 15726
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:41 am
- Location: under the redwood trees
Re: Arguing with a fundie - resource needed
That's Chuck's way of saying he doesn't know. We understand though, he has a big ego to massage.AshtonBlack wrote:Chuck Jones wrote:Speaking from an entirely impartial standpoint, you're wrong. I can tell even without really reading the whole of your post. You were born wrong, and you'll die wrong. Now say my name.pawiz wrote:I made the claim, from memory that the early Christians debated over the divinity of Jebus - i.e. not all agreed that he was the son of the big fella in the sky. This was something I had recalled from the back of my mind, and I vaguely remember watching a documentary about it.
And fairly the fucker has asked me to support my claim![]()
Google returns mostly apologetics sites and a couple of Wiki articles which do not help.
Does anyone have any knowledge of this subject and point me to references that will show I was not talking out of my ass (which of course I was).
Thanks

Atheists have always argued that this world is all that we have, and that our duty is to one another to make the very most and best of it. ~Christopher Hitchens~
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3534/379 ... 3be9_o.jpg[/imgc]
- Chuck Jones
- Court Jester
- Posts: 1149
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 12:57 pm
Re: Arguing with a fundie - resource needed
You shut up now.
- maiforpeace
- Account Suspended at Member's Request
- Posts: 15726
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:41 am
- Location: under the redwood trees
Re: Arguing with a fundie - resource needed
Did I say anything?Chuck Jones wrote:You shut up now.

You weren't supposed to hear that.

Atheists have always argued that this world is all that we have, and that our duty is to one another to make the very most and best of it. ~Christopher Hitchens~
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3534/379 ... 3be9_o.jpg[/imgc]
- .Morticia.
- Comrade Morticia
- Posts: 1715
- Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 2:14 am
- About me: Card Carrying Groucho Marxist
- Location: Bars and Communist Dens of Iniquity
Re: Arguing with a fundie - resource needed
Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedies. ~ Marx
Do you really think it is weakness that yields to temptation? I tell you that there are terrible temptations which it requires strength, strength and courage to yield to. ~ Oscar Wilde
Love Me I'm A Liberal
The Communist Menace
Running The World
Do you really think it is weakness that yields to temptation? I tell you that there are terrible temptations which it requires strength, strength and courage to yield to. ~ Oscar Wilde
Love Me I'm A Liberal
The Communist Menace
Running The World
Re: Arguing with a fundie - resource needed
I couldn't come up with anything in Web searching, but then the very existence of Jeebus is contentious because of the dearth of evidence from the period.
Frankly, debating Fundies is a no-win situation. That's why prominent Atheists, such as Dawkins, no longer debate them. An honest person can't win against a cheat.
And Fundies are skilled debaters, using every dirty tactic known to man. Fallacies, evasion, playing dumb, outright lying, misquoting, - you'll encounter them all. The only thing you can hope to gain is an education in the Fundy mindset. (And the same is true for the Atheist Fundies.)
One of the favourite tricks is to send you off on a research project, to refute some BS the Fundy served up, with you scouring the Web, or the Library, for information, while the Fundy sniggers up his sleeve. And, should you succeed in coming up with a refutation, don't worry, there will be some laughable excuse as to why it's not valid.
You can, however, have some fun. I learned this (the hard way) back in the days of HolySmoke, on the Fidonet Network, before the Web.
Just copy every posting the Fundy makes to a file. That way, you can refute the denials and claims of misquotes and "I never said that" lies. But the real fun comes when the file gets big enough. Then, you needn't bother wasting your time composing replies, that are going to be like water on a duck's back anyway.
Just go through your file of the Fundy's postings, and pick a suitable phrase, and cut and paste that as your reply. Quite often, you can sit back and laugh as the Fundy argues with himself!
It works because, to be a good liar, you need a good memory. And the Fundies tell so many whoppers, and engage in so much deception, they can't keep track of it all, and so, don't even recognize their own BS being used against them. Hilarious, educational, and entertaining.
Frankly, debating Fundies is a no-win situation. That's why prominent Atheists, such as Dawkins, no longer debate them. An honest person can't win against a cheat.
And Fundies are skilled debaters, using every dirty tactic known to man. Fallacies, evasion, playing dumb, outright lying, misquoting, - you'll encounter them all. The only thing you can hope to gain is an education in the Fundy mindset. (And the same is true for the Atheist Fundies.)
One of the favourite tricks is to send you off on a research project, to refute some BS the Fundy served up, with you scouring the Web, or the Library, for information, while the Fundy sniggers up his sleeve. And, should you succeed in coming up with a refutation, don't worry, there will be some laughable excuse as to why it's not valid.
You can, however, have some fun. I learned this (the hard way) back in the days of HolySmoke, on the Fidonet Network, before the Web.
Just copy every posting the Fundy makes to a file. That way, you can refute the denials and claims of misquotes and "I never said that" lies. But the real fun comes when the file gets big enough. Then, you needn't bother wasting your time composing replies, that are going to be like water on a duck's back anyway.
Just go through your file of the Fundy's postings, and pick a suitable phrase, and cut and paste that as your reply. Quite often, you can sit back and laugh as the Fundy argues with himself!
It works because, to be a good liar, you need a good memory. And the Fundies tell so many whoppers, and engage in so much deception, they can't keep track of it all, and so, don't even recognize their own BS being used against them. Hilarious, educational, and entertaining.
''The only way to reduce the number of nuclear weapons is to use them.''
—Rush Limbaugh
—Rush Limbaugh
- Rob
- Carpe Diem
- Posts: 2558
- Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 1:49 am
- About me: Just a man in love with science and the pursuit of knowledge.
- Location: Seattle, WA
- Contact:
Re: Arguing with a fundie - resource needed
I remember reading a book by... I think the last name was Ebert, a new testament historical scholar. He went into detail over the various factions which heavily debated the divinity of Jesus. I think the book was called Jesus - Interrupted.
I can live with doubt, and uncertainty, and not knowing. I think it's much more interesting to live not knowing than to have answers which might be wrong. [...] I don’t feel frightened by not knowing things, by being lost in a mysterious universe without having any purpose, which is the way it really is, as far as I can tell, possibly. It doesn’t frighten me. - Richard Feynman
- cowiz
- Shirley
- Posts: 16482
- Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 11:56 pm
- About me: Head up a camels arse
- Location: Colorado
- Contact:
Re: Arguing with a fundie - resource needed
Are you thinking of Bart Ehrman?Rob wrote:I remember reading a book by... I think the last name was Ebert, a new testament historical scholar. He went into detail over the various factions which heavily debated the divinity of Jesus. I think the book was called Jesus - Interrupted.
It's a piece of piss to be cowiz, but it's not cowiz to be a piece of piss. Or something like that.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 9 guests