LOL? I nearly ROFL'd
Re: LOL? I nearly ROFL'd
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_co ... rope#Spain
Spain
The age of consent in Spain is 13, as specified by the Spanish Penal Code, Article 181(2). However, if deceit is used in gaining the consent of a minor under 16 years an individual can be charged under Article 183(1) upon parental complaint.
Spain
The age of consent in Spain is 13, as specified by the Spanish Penal Code, Article 181(2). However, if deceit is used in gaining the consent of a minor under 16 years an individual can be charged under Article 183(1) upon parental complaint.
Outside the ordered universe is that amorphous blight of nethermost confusion which blasphemes and bubbles at the center of all infinity—the boundless daemon sultan Azathoth, whose name no lips dare speak aloud, and who gnaws hungrily in inconceivable, unlighted chambers beyond time and space amidst the muffled, maddening beating of vile drums and the thin monotonous whine of accursed flutes.
Code: Select all
// Replaces with spaces the braces in cases where braces in places cause stasis
$str = str_replace(array("\{","\}")," ",$str);
- cowiz
- Shirley
- Posts: 16482
- Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 11:56 pm
- About me: Head up a camels arse
- Location: Colorado
- Contact:
Re: LOL? I nearly ROFL'd
I've used conceit for every shag I've ever had.Azathoth wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_co ... rope#Spain
Spain
The age of consent in Spain is 13, as specified by the Spanish Penal Code, Article 181(2). However, if deceit is used in gaining the consent of a minor under 16 years an individual can be charged under Article 183(1) upon parental complaint.
"I drive a Porche baby, fancy a fuck?"
It's a piece of piss to be cowiz, but it's not cowiz to be a piece of piss. Or something like that.
Re: LOL? I nearly ROFL'd
I wouldn't want to specuate...Seraph wrote:I know what to make of the question marks. Clever technique. What planet do you think I live on?Seth wrote:I direct you to the punctuation mark at the end of each sentence. It's known as a "question mark." It denotes an inquiry, not "putting words" in anyone's anything. It invites response.
Seth wrote:I challenge you to find ANY speech by ANY Catholic authority that "attempts to absolve paedophiles among the catholic priesthood from wrong-doing."
So, you were being hyperbolic? I thought so. Care to reflect on the number of verifiable instances in the past 10 years where such things have happened, as opposed to 40 or 50 years ago? The number is quite small, you'll find, if you care to do the research.Of course neither the Vatican nor its representatives will say that their speeches, letters and announcements are "attempts to absolve paedophiles among the catholic priesthood from wrong-doing." They just keep "explaining" why so many of their clerics keep getting exposed for sticking their cocks in children's hands, mouths, twats and arses. Surely, you are familiar with "implied" meanings? You've used the word very recently, yes?
The Catholic church, you see, takes the issue quite seriously and has done more than almost any other organization, secular or religious, on the planet to enact policies and procedures to prevent such things from happening. Priests now go through rigorous psychological testing before ordination, and even lay persons who have ANY contact with children at ANY official or sanctioned church function are REQUIRED to attend child protection lectures and they MUST consent to and pass a criminal background check.
This includes so much as serving hot dogs at a church picnic where kids are present.
Then you might reflect on the fact that it's estimated that FIVE MILLION children EVERY YEAR are molested by public school teachers in the US alone.
This qualifies as searching for motes while ignoring planks.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
Re: LOL? I nearly ROFL'd
I think I'd heard that Spain in particular is a haven for US pedophile ex-pats. Fortunately, unless they renounce their US citizenship, it is unlawful for any US citizen to travel abroad for the purposes of having sex with a person under the age of 18, even if it's legal in the country they go to. It's a federal felony and the US works with Interpol and other law enforcement agencies to track known pedophiles and to arrest and prosecute "child sex tourism."Azathoth wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_co ... rope#Spain
Spain
The age of consent in Spain is 13, as specified by the Spanish Penal Code, Article 181(2). However, if deceit is used in gaining the consent of a minor under 16 years an individual can be charged under Article 183(1) upon parental complaint.
So, it might be legal for a Spanish citizen to bugger a 13 year old, it's illegal for a US citizen to travel to Spain for that purpose. On the other hand, if a US citizen happens to be in Spain and happens to have sex with someone under 18, I don't think it's a crime. There is a mens rea element to the federal law.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
- lordpasternack
- Divine Knob Twiddler
- Posts: 6459
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:05 am
- About me: I have remarkable elbows.
- Contact:
Re: LOL? I nearly ROFL'd
It depends what you mean by "consent" and how it should apply to consenting to fucking in particular, doesn't it? If I offer a 13-year-old boy a shag, he could say "yesh pleash!pawiz wrote:Is this true? Can a 13 year old consent to fuck anyone? I've done no research on this so my question is incredulous.Azathoth wrote:Just a point on the OP. The age of consent in Spain is 13, the lowest in Europe, so the Bishop is actually talking about kids who it would be legal to screw under spanish law

Then they for sudden joy did weep,
And I for sorrow sung,
That such a king should play bo-peep,
And go the fools among.
Prithee, nuncle, keep a schoolmaster that can teach
thy fool to lie: I would fain learn to lie.
And I for sorrow sung,
That such a king should play bo-peep,
And go the fools among.
Prithee, nuncle, keep a schoolmaster that can teach
thy fool to lie: I would fain learn to lie.
- cowiz
- Shirley
- Posts: 16482
- Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 11:56 pm
- About me: Head up a camels arse
- Location: Colorado
- Contact:
Re: LOL? I nearly ROFL'd
The uk age of consent is 16! Why would it be illegal to shag a foreigner who was only 17?Seth wrote:I think I'd heard that Spain in particular is a haven for US pedophile ex-pats. Fortunately, unless they renounce their US citizenship, it is unlawful for any US citizen to travel abroad for the purposes of having sex with a person under the age of 18, even if it's legal in the country they go to. It's a federal felony and the US works with Interpol and other law enforcement agencies to track known pedophiles and to arrest and prosecute "child sex tourism."Azathoth wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_co ... rope#Spain
Spain
The age of consent in Spain is 13, as specified by the Spanish Penal Code, Article 181(2). However, if deceit is used in gaining the consent of a minor under 16 years an individual can be charged under Article 183(1) upon parental complaint.
So, it might be legal for a Spanish citizen to bugger a 13 year old, it's illegal for a US citizen to travel to Spain for that purpose. On the other hand, if a US citizen happens to be in Spain and happens to have sex with someone under 18, I don't think it's a crime. There is a mens rea element to the federal law.
It's a piece of piss to be cowiz, but it's not cowiz to be a piece of piss. Or something like that.
- Hermit
- Posts: 25806
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
- About me: Cantankerous grump
- Location: Ignore lithpt
- Contact:
Re: LOL? I nearly ROFL'd
I Just had a look at a little book titled Lying with Statistics, soSeth wrote:Then you might reflect on the fact that it's estimated that FIVE MILLION children EVERY YEAR are molested by public school teachers in the US alone.
This qualifies as searching for motes while ignoring planks.
1. It's not public school teachers. Included in those statistics is every molestation committed by school's outsourced janitor, plumber, etc.
2. In percentage terms, child molestation is more prevalent in religious institutions than public ones.
Besides, I see nothing wrong with shining a light on an organisation one of whose principal dogmas is that sex is sinful unless it takes place within the confines of a monogamous marriage. Doing so does not mean I am ignoring child molestation in the secular sphere. It just means I am keeping within the realm of this thread: the catholic church and sin.
If you wish to discuss child molestation in public schools, by all means start a discussion in the appropriate area.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
- Gallstones
- Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
- Posts: 8888
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
- About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.
Re: LOL? I nearly ROFL'd
Seth wrote: The Catholic church, you see, takes the issue quite seriously and has done more than almost any other organization, secular or religious, on the planet to enact policies and procedures to prevent such things from happening. Priests now go through rigorous psychological testing before ordination, and even lay persons who have ANY contact with children at ANY official or sanctioned church function are REQUIRED to attend child protection lectures and they MUST consent to and pass a criminal background check.
This includes so much as serving hot dogs at a church picnic where kids are present.
Then you might reflect on the fact that it's estimated that FIVE MILLION children EVERY YEAR are molested by public school teachers in the US alone.
This qualifies as searching for motes while ignoring planks.
As a layperson who taught RE I can verify that I was required to attend in-person instruction sessions at the church and then participate in an online series of lessons paid for by the Diocese on policy and the prevention of exploitation of children. And this was put in place soon after the first charges were being brought. My mother, who handed out the pre-RE snack had to attend and complete them too.
The policy and practices were very strict; no physical contact, never be alone in a room with a child, know where all the blind corners were and if it was normal for a given room to be locked during business hours, stuff like that.
I thought this was going to be a funny thread.

But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010
The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter
The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter
Re: LOL? I nearly ROFL'd
Me too, in order to even pick my own nephews up from a church function.Gallstones wrote:Seth wrote: The Catholic church, you see, takes the issue quite seriously and has done more than almost any other organization, secular or religious, on the planet to enact policies and procedures to prevent such things from happening. Priests now go through rigorous psychological testing before ordination, and even lay persons who have ANY contact with children at ANY official or sanctioned church function are REQUIRED to attend child protection lectures and they MUST consent to and pass a criminal background check.
This includes so much as serving hot dogs at a church picnic where kids are present.
Then you might reflect on the fact that it's estimated that FIVE MILLION children EVERY YEAR are molested by public school teachers in the US alone.
This qualifies as searching for motes while ignoring planks.
As a layperson who taught RE I can verify that I was required to attend in-person instruction sessions at the church and then participate in an online series of lessons paid for by the Diocese on policy and the prevention of exploitation of children. And this was put in place soon after the first charges were being brought. My mother, who handed out the pre-RE snack had to attend and complete them too.
The policy and practices were very strict; no physical contact, never be alone in a room with a child, know where all the blind corners were and if it was normal for a given room to be locked during business hours, stuff like that.
It's in the "serious" section...I thought this was going to be a funny thread.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
- Gallstones
- Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
- Posts: 8888
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
- About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.
Re: LOL? I nearly ROFL'd
I don't pay attention to the details. I never read the header, just the title.Seth wrote:It's in the "serious" section...Gallstones wrote:
I thought this was going to be a funny thread.
Last edited by Gallstones on Fri Feb 11, 2011 3:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010
The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter
The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter
Re: LOL? I nearly ROFL'd
As usual, the pedophiles buggering kids in Thailand ruined it for everybody else.pawiz wrote:The uk age of consent is 16! Why would it be illegal to shag a foreigner who was only 17?Seth wrote:I think I'd heard that Spain in particular is a haven for US pedophile ex-pats. Fortunately, unless they renounce their US citizenship, it is unlawful for any US citizen to travel abroad for the purposes of having sex with a person under the age of 18, even if it's legal in the country they go to. It's a federal felony and the US works with Interpol and other law enforcement agencies to track known pedophiles and to arrest and prosecute "child sex tourism."Azathoth wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_co ... rope#Spain
Spain
The age of consent in Spain is 13, as specified by the Spanish Penal Code, Article 181(2). However, if deceit is used in gaining the consent of a minor under 16 years an individual can be charged under Article 183(1) upon parental complaint.
So, it might be legal for a Spanish citizen to bugger a 13 year old, it's illegal for a US citizen to travel to Spain for that purpose. On the other hand, if a US citizen happens to be in Spain and happens to have sex with someone under 18, I don't think it's a crime. There is a mens rea element to the federal law.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
- cowiz
- Shirley
- Posts: 16482
- Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 11:56 pm
- About me: Head up a camels arse
- Location: Colorado
- Contact:
Re: LOL? I nearly ROFL'd
Youth in AsiaSeth wrote:As usual, the pedophiles buggering kids in Thailand ruined it for everybody else.pawiz wrote:The uk age of consent is 16! Why would it be illegal to shag a foreigner who was only 17?Seth wrote:I think I'd heard that Spain in particular is a haven for US pedophile ex-pats. Fortunately, unless they renounce their US citizenship, it is unlawful for any US citizen to travel abroad for the purposes of having sex with a person under the age of 18, even if it's legal in the country they go to. It's a federal felony and the US works with Interpol and other law enforcement agencies to track known pedophiles and to arrest and prosecute "child sex tourism."Azathoth wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_co ... rope#Spain
Spain
The age of consent in Spain is 13, as specified by the Spanish Penal Code, Article 181(2). However, if deceit is used in gaining the consent of a minor under 16 years an individual can be charged under Article 183(1) upon parental complaint.
So, it might be legal for a Spanish citizen to bugger a 13 year old, it's illegal for a US citizen to travel to Spain for that purpose. On the other hand, if a US citizen happens to be in Spain and happens to have sex with someone under 18, I don't think it's a crime. There is a mens rea element to the federal law.
It's a piece of piss to be cowiz, but it's not cowiz to be a piece of piss. Or something like that.
- Mysturji
- Clint Eastwood
- Posts: 5005
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:08 pm
- About me: Downloading an app to my necktop
- Location: http://tinyurl.com/c9o35ny
- Contact:
Re: LOL? I nearly ROFL'd
Just a point on the OP... What does the age of consent in Spain have to do with an iPhone app?Azathoth wrote:Just a point on the OP. The age of consent in Spain is 13, the lowest in Europe, so the Bishop is actually talking about kids who it would be legal to screw under spanish law

Sir Figg Newton wrote:If I have seen further than others, it is only because I am surrounded by midgets.
IDMD2Cormac wrote:Doom predictors have been with humans right through our history. They are like the proverbial stopped clock - right twice a day, but not due to the efficacy of their prescience.
I am a twit.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests