I remember having to say that prayer in mass, the one right above, in a repetitive, droning voice. Except I mumbled most of the words as I didn't know them or care about them.Catholic Mass 'sexist and elitist', say priests
A new version of the Irish Catholic missal is sexist, elitist and obscure, a group of Irish priests has said.
The Association of Catholic Priests (ACP) is at loggerheads with the Vatican over the text to be used during Mass from April.
The ACP has said that the continual use of the word 'man' and 'he' throughout the text discriminates against women.
"Many women will be rightly enraged by the continued deliberate use of non-inclusive language," the group said in a statement.
"The ACP strongly opposes the introduction and use of any texts which will insult and offend women who are at the heart of every Christian community in Ireland."
It says a prayer which speaks of how Jesus came "for us men and for our salvation" is an example of the non-inclusive language.
This next section brightened my day.
Not only for the absurdity of a Jew 2,000 years ago being tortured and executed for little ol' me, somehow (an absurdity I'm well accustomed too at this stage), but also at the priests' apparent concern over over what the parishioners will think. They won't 'think' anything. The majority will just murmur their prayers, stand, sit, kneel, bow and fuck off home to their Sunday dinner glad that it's over and the ones that actually do care about mass are usually so sycophantic they just simply wouldn't stand up and question. Church never has been a place for exchanging ideas.One of the changes which has drawn its particular ire is to replace the line 'for you and for all' with 'for you and for many'.
It says that the change will cause parishoners may ask "Are there some for whom Jesus did not die?"
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-12366734