Well, Seth!

[Rum]

I'm now uncertain what I can and can't say here. I want to reply to Gallstones, but i'm unsure if that will be seen as "not playing fair" - whatever the fuck that is. Can someone advise me?

Basically anything goes as long at it isn't a personal attack, e.g. 'You are an arselhole', etc..

Well, not according to JimC.

However I would suggest a certain 'spirit' is something at least to keep in mind. Constant bickering ain't much fun for anyone.

I don't care if it's fun or not, it's whether it's allowed or not. Apparently, it seems it isn't. Everyone needs to remember, I am from RS where the personal attack rule is VERY strict. I am very very careful not to attack people, but i will shit all over their argument without a problem. Are you (or anyone for that matter) telling me that you can't demolish the shit out of someone's argument? If I'm nasty to an argument, is that 'not playing fair'?

Oh shut up.

[pErvinalia]

I'm now uncertain what I can and can't say here. I want to reply to Gallstones, but i'm unsure if that will be seen as "not playing fair" - whatever the fuck that is. Can someone advise me?

Your little quarrel would perhaps be best done via PM. That is the best advice you're going to get from anyone ever.

It's involving multiple people in multiple time zones. It makes no sense to have it via PM. And besides, I want to make sure that everyone here understands that this conspiracy lunacy that Seth and Gallstones go on about is retardedness of the highest order. RS certainly has stricter rules than here, but their rules are clear for everyone to read. If a poster breaks them, they only have themselves to blame. This constant blame shifting that goes on is ridiculous.

Anyway, it seems that despite what i just said to JimC, I am blabbing on about Ratskep. Although, I don't see why that is necessarily a problem. Am I being censored?

[irretating]

I'm now uncertain what I can and can't say here. I want to reply to Gallstones, but i'm unsure if that will be seen as "not playing fair" - whatever the fuck that is. Can someone advise me?

Basically anything goes as long at it isn't a personal attack, e.g. 'You are an arselhole', etc..

Well, not according to JimC.

However I would suggest a certain 'spirit' is something at least to keep in mind. Constant bickering ain't much fun for anyone.

I don't care if it's fun or not, it's whether it's allowed or not. Apparently, it seems it isn't. Everyone needs to remember, I am from RS where the personal attack rule is VERY strict. I am very very careful not to attack people, but i will shit all over their argument without a problem. Are you (or anyone for that matter) telling me that you can't demolish the shit out of someone's argument? If I'm nasty to an argument, is that 'not playing fair'?

You're not in Kansas any more...

[pErvinalia]

I'm now uncertain what I can and can't say here. I want to reply to Gallstones, but i'm unsure if that will be seen as "not playing fair" - whatever the fuck that is. Can someone advise me?

Basically anything goes as long at it isn't a personal attack, e.g. 'You are an arselhole', etc..

Well, not according to JimC.

However I would suggest a certain 'spirit' is something at least to keep in mind. Constant bickering ain't much fun for anyone.

I don't care if it's fun or not, it's whether it's allowed or not. Apparently, it seems it isn't. Everyone needs to remember, I am from RS where the personal attack rule is VERY strict. I am very very careful not to attack people, but i will shit all over their argument without a problem. Are you (or anyone for that matter) telling me that you can't demolish the shit out of someone's argument? If I'm nasty to an argument, is that 'not playing fair'?

Oh shut up.

Ok, so now I don't know how to respond. That doesn't seem like 'Playing FairTM'. I'm sure you'll tell me it was a joke, which I suspect it is, but if I was to respond by telling you to 'shove it up your arse', I wouldn't know if i'd been 'Playing FairTM' or not. What's a guy to do?

[M]

..... rules are clear for everyone to read. If a poster breaks them, they only have themselves to blame. This constant blame shifting that goes on is ridiculous.

I actually agree with this.

[pErvinalia]

I'm now uncertain what I can and can't say here. I want to reply to Gallstones, but i'm unsure if that will be seen as "not playing fair" - whatever the fuck that is. Can someone advise me?

Basically anything goes as long at it isn't a personal attack, e.g. 'You are an arselhole', etc..

Well, not according to JimC.

However I would suggest a certain 'spirit' is something at least to keep in mind. Constant bickering ain't much fun for anyone.

I don't care if it's fun or not, it's whether it's allowed or not. Apparently, it seems it isn't. Everyone needs to remember, I am from RS where the personal attack rule is VERY strict. I am very very careful not to attack people, but i will shit all over their argument without a problem. Are you (or anyone for that matter) telling me that you can't demolish the shit out of someone's argument? If I'm nasty to an argument, is that 'not playing fair'?

You're not in Kansas any more...

Thanks, Strawman.

[normal]

I'm now uncertain what I can and can't say here. I want to reply to Gallstones, but i'm unsure if that will be seen as "not playing fair" - whatever the fuck that is. Can someone advise me?

Your little quarrel would perhaps be best done via PM. That is the best advice you're going to get from anyone ever.

It's involving multiple people in multiple time zones. It makes no sense to have it via PM. And besides, I want to make sure that everyone here understands that this conspiracy lunacy that Seth and Gallstones go on about is retardedness of the highest order. RS certainly has stricter rules than here, but their rules are clear for everyone to read. If a poster breaks them, they only have themselves to blame. This constant blame shifting that goes on is ridiculous.

Anyway, it seems that despite what i just said to JimC, I am blabbing on about Ratskep. Although, I don't see why that is necessarily a problem. Am I being censored?

It makes perfect sense. I'm sure the best part of "everyone here understands that" you have some point to make. Now you have spelled out what your point is, and you can go on bickering in PMs. The time-zone is a great thing as it allows for time to cool down. I like it.

And YES, I am trying to censor you, but you don't have to listen to me (I'm also trying to censor galls). You don't have to listen to anyone, actually. You have total freedom to do what you want, and that freedom includes the freedom to break the rules and face the consequences. Now I don't think you're about to do that, because the rules are mostly "don't attack others". We DO however try to encourage people to be nice to each other, however fluffy that may sound.

[pErvinalia]

Ok. I love you.

[normal]

Hehehe, drama. And I'm fueling it. Sorry. I'll go do some actual work. But please, consider the idea of PM bickering. It's an elegant solution

[normal]

Ok. I love you.

Cool, I love you too

[Tigger]

Hehehe, drama. And I'm fueling it. Sorry. I'll go do some actual work. But please, consider the idea of PM bickering. It's an elegant solution

I think you need a warning for that suggestion. It occurs to me that you currently have no warnings too.

[normal]

My warning level is [1]. What does that mean? (no I haven't gone to do any work yet)

[Tigger]

My warning level is [1]. What does that mean? (no I haven't gone to do any work yet)

It means I was wrong!

[normal]

My warning level is [1]. What does that mean? (no I haven't gone to do any work yet)

It means I was wrong!

Warn me some more, baby!

[Robert_S]

This is the welcome thread for Seth.


I would like to propose that any and all posts in this thread which are not related to welcoming Seth to Ratinalia or are not typical Rationalia style derails about worthy and noble subjects such as cheese, bacon, or naughty bits be moved from this thread to a new thread in The Wilder Web.