Well, Seth!

[pErvinalia]

This is the welcome Seth thread.
How about those infrequent posters from onother place not turn it into a shit on Seth thread, mmmmkay?
See the thing is you know you can't do it over there, how about you restrain yourself from doing it here?

Because I, unlike others, play within the rules. If the rules allow me to wail on Seth, in a non-personal-attack manner, then your complaint should be directed towards the FUA here.

Having said that, I haven't read the rule here for many months. Basically I'm acting in what I think is within the rules here.

[Gallstones]

This is the welcome Seth thread.
How about those infrequent posters from onother place not turn it into a shit on Seth thread, mmmmkay?
See the thing is you know you can't do it over there, how about you restrain yourself from doing it here?

Because I, unlike others, play within the rules. If the rules allow me to wail on Seth, in a non-personal-attack manner, then your complaint should be directed towards the FUA here.

Having said that, I haven't read the rule here for many months. Basically I'm acting in what I think is within the rules here.

Hypocrisy. There is a stench of it in the air.

[Mac_Guffin]

As if it wasn't bad enough having Seth back on Ratskep...

You don't, for another week...in yet another stunning display of corruption and hypocrisy, I get suspended on very dubious grounds while the 30 or more clear violations I reported against me are universally ignored, including calling me a psychopath and all manner of other direct personal insults, which are prohibited over there.

What a bunch of hypocritical assholes.

I somehow doubt they were dubious reasons. Which post (according to the mods) got you banned?

I don't see the hypocrisy. There are other posters there who share some of your views. They don't get themselves into teh amount of shit you do.

[Azathoth]

This is the welcome Seth thread.
How about those infrequent posters from onother place not turn it into a shit on Seth thread, mmmmkay?
See the thing is you know you can't do it over there, how about you restrain yourself from doing it here?

Because I, unlike others, play within the rules. If the rules allow me to wail on Seth, in a non-personal-attack manner, then your complaint should be directed towards the FUA here.

Having said that, I haven't read the rule here for many months. Basically I'm acting in what I think is within the rules here.

You just need to read the first line. That pretty much covers everything

Postby Pappa » Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:46 am
FORUM RULES:

* Play nice, please . Those who intentionally harass other members, openly or via private correspondence, will be penalised.

[Mac_Guffin]

If my comments toe the line of harrassment, I'll accept my sanction proudly. I don't whine about the things I deserve.

I'm trying to hold back, but it's ironic that one of the reasons (as well as missing the relaxed nature, posters I don't see on Ratskep, etc.)I thought of posting more here again was to enjoy a thread or few without Seth's BS. Then a day after (or was it within the same day?), I see that he's joining.
Ah well, that's life.

[maiforpeace]

I wonder if all of you 'anti-sethites' realize how you sound...I don't remember really hearing much out of several of you until now. Would you let those of us who don't know Seth get to know him? It's crystal clear you all don't like him - GOT IT.

Here's a thought...instead why not be silently smug about Seth and patiently wait to 'tell us so'. That'll teach us.

In the meantime, why not just go have some fun and join in some other banter or discussions besides just Seth. Frankly you all seem a bit obsessive about him.

Mac_Guffin, I imagine there will be a lot of threads that Seth isn't going to be on. We also have a foe function...if you've never used it before, you will be surprised at how easy it is to avoid someone and their 'BS' that way.

[pErvinalia]

This is the welcome Seth thread.
How about those infrequent posters from onother place not turn it into a shit on Seth thread, mmmmkay?
See the thing is you know you can't do it over there, how about you restrain yourself from doing it here?

Because I, unlike others, play within the rules. If the rules allow me to wail on Seth, in a non-personal-attack manner, then your complaint should be directed towards the FUA here.

Having said that, I haven't read the rule here for many months. Basically I'm acting in what I think is within the rules here.

You just need to read the first line. That pretty much covers everything

Postby Pappa » Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:46 am
FORUM RULES:

* Play nice, please . Those who intentionally harass other members, openly or via private correspondence, will be penalised.

Riiiggghhht. So will Seth and Gallstones be penalised for harrassing myself and Scott and 914?

The irony of this is too great. Seth and Gallstones come here because the modding over at RS is too stifling (read corrupt), and then I come over here to defend my oh so great name, and get threatened with moderationization. Cool.

Anyway, as soon as Seth lays off the slanging, i will too.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

All the social dynamics of a nursery school.

[pErvinalia]

I wonder if all of you 'anti-sethites' realize how you sound...I don't remember really hearing much out of several of you until now. Would you let those of us who don't know Seth get to know him? It's crystal clear you all don't like him - GOT IT.

Here's a thought...instead why not be silently smug about Seth and patiently wait to 'tell us so'. That'll teach us.

In the meantime, why not just go have some fun and join in some other banter or discussions besides just Seth. Frankly you all seem a bit obsessive about him.

I'm only reacting to his slagging off at us. If he wasn't slagging off at us, then I wouldn't have said anything.

[cowiz]

All the social dynamics of a nursery school.

I'm going to go to a kindergarten tomorrow so I can surround myself with far more rational and well balanced people

[pErvinalia]

All the social dynamics of a nursery school.

There be irony there too, GZ. Can you spot it (hint, it has to do with your time at RS)?

[Gawdzilla Sama]

All the social dynamics of a nursery school.

There be irony there too, GZ. Can you spot it (hint, it has to do with your time at RS)?

Yeah, you acted the same way over there. Ironic, isn't it?

[pErvinalia]

And where the bloody hell is Seth? I've posted all this stuff, and now he decides to go and have a sleep or something. Who am I going to argue with? :sad:

EDIT: Hah! I see he is lurking. C'mon Sethie, give me some lovin'!

[pErvinalia]

All the social dynamics of a nursery school.

There be irony there too, GZ. Can you spot it (hint, it has to do with your time at RS)?

Yeah, you acted the same way over there. Ironic, isn't it?

I know what I am, but what are you?

[Seth]

Oh hai, Seth! Didn't think you would get rid of me that easily, did you? (man I love the smilies here!)

And by the way, do you have any proof of this apparent conspiracy to ban you from Ratskep? Don't you think it more likely that perhaps you just can't accept the more stricter rules we've got over there? And let's look at this objectively... there have been quite a number of warnings handed out to other members who have attacked you in those threads at ratskep. Looks pretty even handed to me.

Of course not, it was very well hidden behind the scenes in the Mod PM section, where evidence can be scrubbed and nobody gets to see what's being said. But I had a couple of inside sources who told me all about it.

As for warnings, of the 30 or more complaints, I saw two, and only one was an official warning and took place after scott illegally violated my copyrights by reposting one of my posts here to Ratskep, which got Factman2 a warning. The other 30 complaints were soundly ignored.

Anyway, welcome, it should be fun. You play nice, I play nice, we all play nice, and we can actually have vigorous debates without officious assholes engaging in subjective analysis and handing out warnings to protect the tender sensibilities of intolerant asses. I'm looking forward to it. The notion of actual free speech is great!

I'm not going to discuss the Ratskep problem much further, since it's considered to be a bit declasse here. But it's my welcome thread, so I thought explaining why I came here was important.