Why is Jacqui Smith still Home Secretary?

Post Reply
devogue

Why is Jacqui Smith still Home Secretary?

Post by devogue » Fri May 01, 2009 5:26 pm

There is something rotten in the state of Denmark.

Is it me? Honestly, is it me?

There is a thieving bitch holding one of the highest offices in the United Kingdom.

She has not been sacked, she has not been forced to resign.

She has been openly called a thief, a horrendous accusation, by the journalist Peter Oborne and, as he predicted, she has taken no legal action.

Because she can't.

Because she is a fucking thief.

The current apathy of the British electorate is, in my opinion, unprecedented.

User avatar
War Arrow
Traitorous TAF Fifth Columnist
Posts: 901
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:43 pm
About me: gettin' ig'nant
Location: parked car outside your house with a dozen pork pies and a crate of brown ale
Contact:

Re: Why is Jacqui Smith still Home Secretary?

Post by War Arrow » Fri May 01, 2009 5:42 pm

It just seems part of a trend wherein government once governed by well... governing, then governed by pulling the wool over our eyes in a few places, maybe cutting corners but essentially trying to do a job... now they just seem to openly lie, and tell us they're lieing with big smiles on the faces of all concerned. At least since the whole non-existent WMDs thing, ministers seem to regard statements made as amounting to content-free noise by which the reassuring smile is provided a soundtrack. It no longer really matters what they say, so it seems.
Image

al-rawandi
Posts: 150
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 10:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Why is Jacqui Smith still Home Secretary?

Post by al-rawandi » Fri May 01, 2009 9:35 pm

Devogue wrote:There is something rotten in the state of Denmark.

Is it me? Honestly, is it me?

There is a thieving bitch holding one of the highest offices in the United Kingdom.

She has not been sacked, she has not been forced to resign.

She has been openly called a thief, a horrendous accusation, by the journalist Peter Oborne and, as he predicted, she has taken no legal action.

Because she can't.

Because she is a fucking thief.

The current apathy of the British electorate is, in my opinion, unprecedented.
I blame you for getting me started. This is the same Jacqui Smith that signed off on banning Geert Wilders from the UK for being a threat "to social harmony"... Not the homicidal Muslims who burn cars whenever someone says something they don't like about Islam... no no no, just the guy saying that these people are a problem. She has repeatedly allowed terrorist apologists and even official spokespeople into the UK no problem (a certain Holocaust denying Hezbollah spokesman comes to mind).

So it doesn't surprise me that she is a thief at all, but she is a sniveling spineless Dhimmwit as well.

User avatar
Arse
Posts: 1609
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 12:28 pm
Contact:

Re: Why is Jacqui Smith still Home Secretary?

Post by Arse » Fri May 01, 2009 9:38 pm

She's also the one that wants us to describe terrorist attacks carried out in the name of Islam as "anti-Islamic activity." She is a numpty as well as a thief.
Image

User avatar
Pappa
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Posts: 56488
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
Contact:

Re: Why is Jacqui Smith still Home Secretary?

Post by Pappa » Fri May 01, 2009 10:19 pm

Minister's don't have to resign when they do wrong any more. They grin and bear it until the media go... "Oooo look a butterfly"... or maybe Swine Flu / War / US Erections / Whatever.
For information on ways to help support Rationalia financially, see our funding page.


When the aliens do come, everything we once thought was cool will then make us ashamed.

User avatar
The Red Fox
Posts: 1333
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 5:09 am
About me: Or Deeper Still...
Location: Stuck on the planet's surface
Contact:

Re: Why is Jacqui Smith still Home Secretary?

Post by The Red Fox » Fri May 01, 2009 11:28 pm

Devogue wrote:The current apathy of the British electorate is, in my opinion, unprecedented.
The British public are still busy spending money that isn't their own. For all the cries about this "horrid" recession (or "moneygeddon" as the brilliant Charlie Brooker named it on newswipe), it still hasn't hit pockets deeply enough to cause so much as a whimper. Even the creeping fascism of anti-terror legislation and the police begging people to inform on neighbours hasn't provoked a reaction. Besides the usual outraged wingers on the far left and right of the political spectrum of course, but who cares what those nutters think?

Keep the public dumb, well fed and rich and you can abuse them however you like.

/rant
Image
MacIver wrote:Now I want to see a pterodactyl rape the Pope.
"There's a tidal wave of mysticism surging through our jet-aged generation" - Funkadelic

al-rawandi
Posts: 150
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 10:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Why is Jacqui Smith still Home Secretary?

Post by al-rawandi » Sat May 02, 2009 3:00 am

ghost wrote:She's also the one that wants us to describe terrorist attacks carried out in the name of Islam as "anti-Islamic activity." She is a numpty as well as a thief.

I forgot about that one. Kind of like saying Auschwitz was "anti-German activity". She is a worthless pile of excrement.

devogue

Re: Why is Jacqui Smith still Home Secretary?

Post by devogue » Sat May 02, 2009 10:51 am

Let's not forget Tessa "Fucking" Jowell, who "knew absolutely nothing" about her husband's corrupt dealings with Berlusconi and Tony "Fucking" McNulty who also stole public money.

Not to mention the crook Peter "Fucking" Mandelson and the war criminal Tony "Fucking" Blair.

All very rich people. All immune from prosecution.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 16 guests