The atheist "A" symbol

A forum to talk about other sites and things you've found in the jungle that is the internet.

Please take a moment to read the rationalia guidelines: http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3449
User avatar
lordpasternack
Divine Knob Twiddler
Posts: 6459
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:05 am
About me: I have remarkable elbows.
Contact:

Re: The atheist "A" symbol

Post by lordpasternack » Tue Jan 04, 2011 4:33 pm

Feck wrote:Presumably Zapfino is owned by someone ? or at least it was created by someone . If I were that someone I would be unhappy with Josh.
Google is your friend, dear. It's owned by Linotype - a company that once had its main line in typewriters, which now seems to specialise in fonts. Josh is having a fucking laugh if he wants to claim ownership of the "design" of that letter, or his very, very slight embellishments to it - but I think we've probably established by this point that Josh does like to have a good fucking laugh

Josh Timonen is quite a talented conman - and when he finally learns to stop insulting everyone's intelligence, and having such a TRANSPARENTLY fragile, needy and hungry ego - then he'll probably be so much better!
Then they for sudden joy did weep,
And I for sorrow sung,
That such a king should play bo-peep,
And go the fools among.
Prithee, nuncle, keep a schoolmaster that can teach
thy fool to lie: I would fain learn to lie.

User avatar
Atheist-Lite
Formerly known as Crumple
Posts: 8745
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 12:35 pm
About me: You need a jetpack? Here, take mine. I don't need a jetpack this far away.
Location: In the Galactic Hub, Yes That One !!!
Contact:

Re: The atheist "A" symbol

Post by Atheist-Lite » Tue Jan 04, 2011 4:48 pm

Who does own the font? I mean they need to be notified so they can get a piece of the coming action? :pop:
nxnxm,cm,m,fvmf,vndfnm,nm,f,dvm,v v vmfm,vvm,d,dd vv sm,mvd,fmf,fn ,v fvfm,

User avatar
lordpasternack
Divine Knob Twiddler
Posts: 6459
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:05 am
About me: I have remarkable elbows.
Contact:

Re: The atheist "A" symbol

Post by lordpasternack » Tue Jan 04, 2011 4:49 pm

Incidentally, I sent Richard Dawkins a nice little saccharine-sweet fanletter shortly after posting last night making him aware of this matter:
I just thought you might like this little piece of fodder, particularly in light of Timonen's claim to his "design":

http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.p ... 00#p719585

The man is a FUCKING IMBECILE! a deeply dishonest, manipulative, bare-faced-lying, reality-divorced, mediocre, egotistical, narcissistic imbecile!

How on earth were you ever suckered by him?

Oh, say, do you think you'd let me run your online store for you, Richard? I venture I have similar talent to fill that man's shoes, and my conscience would actually trouble me at some point while I was taking you for a great big ride and letting you swoon all over me and take my bullets for me all the while. And I wouldn't go mad, for the big house and the fancy pool. I'd curb myself at a new car and a package holiday somewhere, I reckon.

Should I try winning you over with flattery and platitudes? Just what is it that will get you to part with wads of cash for people with mediocre talent and personality issues, like me?Have I already done too much of a good job at preventing you from believing the sun shines out of my arse? I know - I'm just far too honest - that's my problem. If you must employ mediocre pricks - you like them to be at least superficially charming and impressive, casually dishonest pricks.

And on reflection - traffic's sliding so slowly but surely down the shitter these days that it probably wouldn't be so appealling a profit-making venture, anyway. One can't help but wonder if the current website design was maybe one last-ditch attempt of Josh's to take the piss right out of you. Oh well, it was worth a shot all the same, I suppose…

Now, back to our muttons.

Best,

Heather.
:biggrin:
Then they for sudden joy did weep,
And I for sorrow sung,
That such a king should play bo-peep,
And go the fools among.
Prithee, nuncle, keep a schoolmaster that can teach
thy fool to lie: I would fain learn to lie.

User avatar
Millefleur
Sugar Nips
Posts: 7752
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 10:10 am
About me: I like buttons. Shiny, shiny buttons.
Location: In a box.
Contact:

Re: The atheist "A" symbol

Post by Millefleur » Tue Jan 04, 2011 4:52 pm

Kevin wrote:Who does own the font? I mean they need to be notified so they can get a piece of the coming action? :pop:
Be funny if the company were run by rabid cristians :lol:
Men! They're all beasts!
Yeah. But isn't it wonderful?

Image

User avatar
lordpasternack
Divine Knob Twiddler
Posts: 6459
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:05 am
About me: I have remarkable elbows.
Contact:

Re: The atheist "A" symbol

Post by lordpasternack » Tue Jan 04, 2011 4:53 pm

Kevin wrote:Who does own the font? I mean they need to be notified so they can get a piece of the coming action? :pop:
See above your post. :tup:
Then they for sudden joy did weep,
And I for sorrow sung,
That such a king should play bo-peep,
And go the fools among.
Prithee, nuncle, keep a schoolmaster that can teach
thy fool to lie: I would fain learn to lie.

User avatar
Atheist-Lite
Formerly known as Crumple
Posts: 8745
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 12:35 pm
About me: You need a jetpack? Here, take mine. I don't need a jetpack this far away.
Location: In the Galactic Hub, Yes That One !!!
Contact:

Re: The atheist "A" symbol

Post by Atheist-Lite » Tue Jan 04, 2011 4:58 pm

lordpasternack wrote:
Kevin wrote:Who does own the font? I mean they need to be notified so they can get a piece of the coming action? :pop:
See above your post. :tup:
A subsidiary of Montotype Imaging?

http://www.monotypeimaging.com/contact/
nxnxm,cm,m,fvmf,vndfnm,nm,f,dvm,v v vmfm,vvm,d,dd vv sm,mvd,fmf,fn ,v fvfm,

User avatar
hadespussercats
I've come for your pants.
Posts: 18586
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:27 am
About me: Looks pretty good, coming out of the back of his neck like that.
Location: Gotham
Contact:

Re: The atheist "A" symbol

Post by hadespussercats » Wed Jan 05, 2011 12:38 am

lordpasternack wrote:Hades - I actually recall jokingly saying to a friend from the forum in person a while back that I don't want to ADVERTISE the fact that I'm an adulterer. :hehe:
Are you kidding? That's why I like it! :hehe: ( I kid. Though I suppose going in to marriage in a decidedly non-virginal state might be considered adultery by some standards...)
The green careening planet
spins blindly in the dark
so close to annihilation.

Listen. No one listens. Meow.

User avatar
hadespussercats
I've come for your pants.
Posts: 18586
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:27 am
About me: Looks pretty good, coming out of the back of his neck like that.
Location: Gotham
Contact:

Re: The atheist "A" symbol

Post by hadespussercats » Wed Jan 05, 2011 12:42 am

Kevin wrote:
lordpasternack wrote:
Kevin wrote:Who does own the font? I mean they need to be notified so they can get a piece of the coming action? :pop:
See above your post. :tup:
A subsidiary of Montotype Imaging?

http://www.monotypeimaging.com/contact/
The tweaks that JT made to the letter-- color, shine, dimensionality-- might be enough to free him from any charges of copyright infringement, anyway, regardless of the source material. Or the design might be old enough to have entered public domain. Intellectual property rights are complicated, and I'm unfamiliar with the laws in his jurisdiction.
The green careening planet
spins blindly in the dark
so close to annihilation.

Listen. No one listens. Meow.

User avatar
lordpasternack
Divine Knob Twiddler
Posts: 6459
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:05 am
About me: I have remarkable elbows.
Contact:

Re: The atheist "A" symbol

Post by lordpasternack » Thu Jan 06, 2011 5:20 pm

Oh, and Josh - should you ever read this thread - I hope you'll forgive my immodesty here by referring to previous fruits of labour of my own - but this is ACTUAL DESIGN WORK:

Image

It's a quick re-doing of a stylised design of my initials that I did for my Standard Grade Art & Design class, when I was 14 years old. I just knocked it up on MS Paint, which is unfortunately the most hi-tech graphics design programme available on my university computers that I know of - so I hope you'll forgive the faults in the curves on the "D", which I did freehand with the pencil and which I can't be fucked trying to get perfect due to that.

Even irrespective of how neat and aesthetic anyone thinks it is - it has the basic redeeming quality that I ACTUALLY DID IT MY FUCKING SELF. I hope you can take that moral from this little story.

And if you think it's good - you should see the rest of my iceberg - what, what! :dance:
Then they for sudden joy did weep,
And I for sorrow sung,
That such a king should play bo-peep,
And go the fools among.
Prithee, nuncle, keep a schoolmaster that can teach
thy fool to lie: I would fain learn to lie.

User avatar
Tigger
1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 piccolos
Posts: 15714
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:26 pm
About me: It's not "about" me, it's exactly me.
Location: location location.

Re: The atheist "A" symbol

Post by Tigger » Thu Jan 06, 2011 7:40 pm

;this: How much do you want for it? ;)
Image
Seth wrote:Fuck that, I like opening Pandora's box and shoving my tool inside it

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: The atheist "A" symbol

Post by Coito ergo sum » Thu Jan 06, 2011 7:54 pm

lordpasternack wrote:Mai - I meant that others involved may have been those who TOOK the "design" and got all the products of it made. Josh gave the inspiration, they did the perspiration. The countersuit is about who owns the design, not who did work with that design to make products for
RDF. And a small fact probably is that they're not suing Richard because they're not wankers. :tup:

As for making something scarlet being an example of any genuine kind of design work - oh give me a break! The symbol may still be reallyneat and clever. Maybe Josh is a GENIUS font-picker and colourer! But, well, I don't see any kind of actual work involved at all.

I also think it's problematic, to put it mildly, to try to claim copyright for a single letter (presumably in any colour) that is already part of a standard font that is naturally already someone else's copyright, and subject to copyright law corollary to that. If the font is leased for free
commercial use - then I could theoretically use that font's "A" on my products all I fucking want. And RDF can like it. And the courts can laugh at Josh. And if not, the owner of the font might want to have words with RDF…
Has there been a countersuit yet? Or, is it an anticipated countersuit? I couldn't find any countersuit noted on the docket the other day.

In the US, a person's copyright attaches or arises at the time a "work" (writing - design - drawing - whatever) is created. At the creator's option, he may register the copyright with the US Library of Congress, Copyright Office. A logo may also be registered as a trademark if it is used in commerce or intended to be used in commerce in connection with particular goods and services.

I did a quick trademark search at uspto.gov, and found nothing under Timonen or Upper Branch. At the copyright office, there are two registrations filed by Upper Branch - Atheist Alliance International and some Pat Condell Anthology. http://cocatalog.loc.gov/cgi-bin/Pwebre ... HC=2&SID=4 - anyone involved in those organizations may be well served to check their paperwork to make sure Josh did not reserve ownership....

I didn't check the non-US trademark and copyright registration databases, and the US is not the only registration repository, but since Josh is in California it's likely he'd register in the US. California probably has its own registration office too, but I didn't check there.

As for using the A, and whether it's a common font - that issue could either be identified during registration, where a government examiner identifies it as too generic or obvious to be registrable. Or, the issue can still come up in an infringement dispute - and it becomes a question of proof.

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: The atheist "A" symbol

Post by Coito ergo sum » Thu Jan 06, 2011 7:56 pm

Kevin wrote:Who does own the font? I mean they need to be notified so they can get a piece of the coming action? :pop:
Possibly nobody. It may well be in the public domain.

User avatar
hadespussercats
I've come for your pants.
Posts: 18586
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:27 am
About me: Looks pretty good, coming out of the back of his neck like that.
Location: Gotham
Contact:

Re: The atheist "A" symbol

Post by hadespussercats » Thu Jan 06, 2011 8:34 pm

Coito ergo sum wrote:
Kevin wrote:Who does own the font? I mean they need to be notified so they can get a piece of the coming action? :pop:
Possibly nobody. It may well be in the public domain.
( ((Is there an echo in here?)) )
The green careening planet
spins blindly in the dark
so close to annihilation.

Listen. No one listens. Meow.

User avatar
hadespussercats
I've come for your pants.
Posts: 18586
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:27 am
About me: Looks pretty good, coming out of the back of his neck like that.
Location: Gotham
Contact:

Re: The atheist "A" symbol

Post by hadespussercats » Thu Jan 06, 2011 8:38 pm

LP wrote: "As for making something scarlet being an example of any genuine kind of design work - oh give me a break! The symbol may still be reallyneat and clever. Maybe Josh is a GENIUS font-picker and colourer! But, well, I don't see any kind of actual work involved at all."
On an emotional level, I agree with you. But picking a font and coloring it does in fact constitute design work, however minimal that work might seem to be. And people have been able to claim intellectual property rights for less. Again, I don't know enough about the particulars of the case to say more than that.
The green careening planet
spins blindly in the dark
so close to annihilation.

Listen. No one listens. Meow.

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: The atheist "A" symbol

Post by Coito ergo sum » Thu Jan 06, 2011 9:03 pm

hadespussercats wrote:
LP wrote: "As for making something scarlet being an example of any genuine kind of design work - oh give me a break! The symbol may still be reallyneat and clever. Maybe Josh is a GENIUS font-picker and colourer! But, well, I don't see any kind of actual work involved at all."
On an emotional level, I agree with you. But picking a font and coloring it does in fact constitute design work, however minimal that work might seem to be. And people have been able to claim intellectual property rights for less. Again, I don't know enough about the particulars of the case to say more than that.
The amount of work that goes into it really has nothing to do with whether a person has intellectual property rights to a symbol. Either Josh has copyright to the symbol, or he doesn't. If it's Josh's original works of authorship fixed in a tangible medium of expression, then it's his copyright (unless he was hired by someone else to create it). If it's Josh's trademark - i.e. if Upper Branch owns the store, and the trademark was created by Upper Branch for use in selling/marketing the store's products, then it's his trademark (unless he was hired to create it for someone else). Whether it was easy or hard has nothing much to do with it.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests