I.... err... agree with fox.

Trolldor
Gargling with Nails
Posts: 15878
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 5:57 am
Contact:

I.... err... agree with fox.

Post by Trolldor » Thu Dec 30, 2010 5:03 am

http://www.smh.com.au/sport/nfl-star-sh ... 19awu.html
NFL star 'should have been executed': anaylst
December 30, 2010 - 3:29PM

Fox News commentator Tucker Carlson.

Fox News commentator Tucker Carlson. Photo: AP

A commentator on US news network Fox News has sparked controversy after saying that an NFL quarterback "should have been executed" for his role in the killing of dogs.
Last edited by charlou* on Thu Dec 30, 2010 9:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: fixed quote tags
"The fact is that far more crime and child abuse has been committed by zealots in the name of God, Jesus and Mohammed than has ever been committed in the name of Satan. Many people don't like that statement but few can argue with it."

User avatar
Tyrannical
Posts: 6468
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
Contact:

Re: I.... err... agree with fox.

Post by Tyrannical » Thu Dec 30, 2010 5:44 am

Vick also hopes to own a dog again once that ban is lifted, to help in the "rehabilitation" process. Of course that makes as much sense as giving a child to a pedophile.
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: I.... err... agree with fox.

Post by Hermit » Thu Dec 30, 2010 5:50 am

Trolldor wrote:I.... err... agree with fox.
I... err... am not surprised.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: I.... err... agree with fox.

Post by Robert_S » Thu Dec 30, 2010 5:51 am

Trolldor wrote:http://www.smh.com.au/sport/nfl-star-sh ... 19awu.html

[youtube]NFL star 'should have been executed': anaylst
December 30, 2010 - 3:29PM

Fox News commentator Tucker Carlson.

Fox News commentator Tucker Carlson. Photo: AP

A commentator on US news network Fox News has sparked controversy after saying that an NFL quarterback "should have been executed" for his role in the killing of dogs.[/youtube]
Tucker Carlson. wrote:I'm a Christian. I've made mistakes myself. I believe fervently in second chances," Carlson said.

"But Michael Vick killed dogs, and he did it in a heartless and cruel way. And I think, personally, he should have been executed for that. He wasn't, but the idea that the president of the United States would be getting behind someone who murdered dogs?"
I wouldn't mind seeing a dog murderer get a proportional retaliation. But the time to argue that was at the guy's sentencing. This guy's just bitching because President Obama made a phone call about a decision that had already been reached. Also, Jesus said forgive. He didn't say forgive when you aren't actually pissed off, offended, and /or deeply enraged at the cruelty and stupidity of our fellow homo sapiens. If Tucker Carlson cannot handle the core values of Christianity, he should not claim to be a Christian.
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
Feck
.
.
Posts: 28391
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:25 pm
Contact:

Re: I.... err... agree with fox.

Post by Feck » Thu Dec 30, 2010 9:03 am

I'm not a Christian , Nor a President , I don't watch Fox .. Vick should never see daylight again.A 5'x5' cage in a cellar and a diet of dog kibble for the rest of this fuckers life
:hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog:
Give me the wine , I don't need the bread

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74223
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: I.... err... agree with fox.

Post by JimC » Thu Dec 30, 2010 9:15 am

Feck wrote:I'm not a Christian , Nor a President , I don't watch Fox .. Vick should never see daylight again.A 5'x5' cage in a cellar and a diet of dog kibble for the rest of this fuckers life
Budget brand dog kibble! :lay:
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
GreyICE
Account Suspended at Member's Request
Posts: 284
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 10:27 pm

Re: I.... err... agree with fox.

Post by GreyICE » Thu Dec 30, 2010 9:32 am

An interesting fact is that it has been repeatedly shown that audiences react much worse to the death of an animal than to the death of a person in movies. A slaughtered person in a slasher film often elicits a yawn, no matter how gory. A dead dog earns much worse reactions.

It has been suggested this applies in real life as well. This is most likely because people are irrational.
Gallstones, I believe you know how to contact me. The rest of you? I could not possibly even care.

User avatar
Feck
.
.
Posts: 28391
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:25 pm
Contact:

Re: I.... err... agree with fox.

Post by Feck » Thu Dec 30, 2010 9:33 am

GreyICE wrote:An interesting fact is that it has been repeatedly shown that audiences react much worse to the death of an animal than to the death of a person in movies. A slaughtered person in a slasher film often elicits a yawn, no matter how gory. A dead dog earns much worse reactions.

It has been suggested this applies in real life as well. This is most likely because people are irrational.

Or that dogs are better loved than people .Not irrational IMHO
:hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog:
Give me the wine , I don't need the bread

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74223
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: I.... err... agree with fox.

Post by JimC » Thu Dec 30, 2010 9:56 am

Feck wrote:
GreyICE wrote:An interesting fact is that it has been repeatedly shown that audiences react much worse to the death of an animal than to the death of a person in movies. A slaughtered person in a slasher film often elicits a yawn, no matter how gory. A dead dog earns much worse reactions.

It has been suggested this applies in real life as well. This is most likely because people are irrational.

Or that dogs are better loved than people .Not irrational IMHO
:cheers:
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Animavore
Nasty Hombre
Posts: 39276
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:26 am
Location: Ire Land.
Contact:

Re: I.... err... agree with fox.

Post by Animavore » Thu Dec 30, 2010 10:42 am

*snork* Does anyone really think he would've said that had it been a white player?

My cynicism says, "No".
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.

User avatar
maiforpeace
Account Suspended at Member's Request
Posts: 15726
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:41 am
Location: under the redwood trees

Re: I.... err... agree with fox.

Post by maiforpeace » Thu Dec 30, 2010 10:51 am

Jynx wrote:*snork* Does anyone really think he would've said that had it been a white player?

My cynicism says, "No".
:this:

No offense to anyone, but why do people reserve this outrage just for dogs? I'm pretty sure I've heard everyone here talk about eating meat.
Atheists have always argued that this world is all that we have, and that our duty is to one another to make the very most and best of it. ~Christopher Hitchens~
Image
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3534/379 ... 3be9_o.jpg[/imgc]

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74223
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: I.... err... agree with fox.

Post by JimC » Thu Dec 30, 2010 10:55 am

maiforpeace wrote:
Jynx wrote:*snork* Does anyone really think he would've said that had it been a white player?

My cynicism says, "No".
:this:

No offense to anyone, but why do people reserve this outrage just for dogs? I'm pretty sure I've heard everyone here talk about eating meat.
We have had similar discussions before. I'm sure it has to do with the depth of the emotional relationships that dog (and cat) owners develop with their particular animal friend; and none the worse an argument from that...

As to the black/white aspect, I'll leave that for people in the States to judge...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Animavore
Nasty Hombre
Posts: 39276
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:26 am
Location: Ire Land.
Contact:

Re: I.... err... agree with fox.

Post by Animavore » Thu Dec 30, 2010 10:59 am

Well I have no emotional relationship with dogs or cats having never owned any or have any intention of ever doing so. I think killing a human over killing a dog is completely crazy, to be honest. I mean, if I found a dead human I'd be deeply shocked and would call the guards straight away. If I found a dead dog I'd simply leave it were it is, or if it's out on the road I might get a shovel and toss it into a ditch. I'm sorry, but I don't see animals on any type of level that I see humans.
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74223
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: I.... err... agree with fox.

Post by JimC » Thu Dec 30, 2010 11:01 am

Jynx wrote:Well I have no emotional relationship with dogs or cats having never owned any or have any intention of ever doing so. I think killing a human over killing a dog is completely crazy, to be honest. I mean, if I found a dead human I'd be deeply shocked and would call the guards straight away. If I found a dead dog I'd simply leave it were it is, or if it's out on the road I might get a shovel and toss it into a ditch. I'm sorry, but I don't see animals on any type of level that I see humans.
One day, a little puppy or little kitten will sneak under your guard, and then we shall see... :hehe:
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

Trolldor
Gargling with Nails
Posts: 15878
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 5:57 am
Contact:

Re: I.... err... agree with fox.

Post by Trolldor » Thu Dec 30, 2010 11:11 am

Jynx wrote:Well I have no emotional relationship with dogs or cats having never owned any or have any intention of ever doing so. I think killing a human over killing a dog is completely crazy, to be honest. I mean, if I found a dead human I'd be deeply shocked and would call the guards straight away. If I found a dead dog I'd simply leave it were it is, or if it's out on the road I might get a shovel and toss it into a ditch. I'm sorry, but I don't see animals on any type of level that I see humans.
And a good thing that is too. Humans are much more horrid.

For starters they very deliberately put your life in danger to skip ahead one car space and get to the next red light two seconds faster.
"The fact is that far more crime and child abuse has been committed by zealots in the name of God, Jesus and Mohammed than has ever been committed in the name of Satan. Many people don't like that statement but few can argue with it."

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests