Over-generalize much?Deersbee wrote:'fraid people take such stuff seriously, Americans are very fond of 12 steps, 3 phases, 4 keys or 9 whatever-systems.Trolldor wrote:The 'third date' significance is a staple of Merkin movies for sure.[/quote

Over-generalize much?Deersbee wrote:'fraid people take such stuff seriously, Americans are very fond of 12 steps, 3 phases, 4 keys or 9 whatever-systems.Trolldor wrote:The 'third date' significance is a staple of Merkin movies for sure.[/quote
LOL, certainly, liberal atheists are excluded from this proposition!FBM wrote:Over-generalize much?Deersbee wrote:'fraid people take such stuff seriously, Americans are very fond of 12 steps, 3 phases, 4 keys or 9 whatever-systems.Trolldor wrote:The 'third date' significance is a staple of Merkin movies for sure.[/quote
Deersbee wrote:LOL, certainly, liberal atheists are excluded from this proposition!FBM wrote:Over-generalize much?Deersbee wrote:'fraid people take such stuff seriously, Americans are very fond of 12 steps, 3 phases, 4 keys or 9 whatever-systems.Trolldor wrote:The 'third date' significance is a staple of Merkin movies for sure.[/quote
There's a clue in the article indicating that you'd win: "Professor Dean Busby, from Brigham Young University's School of Family Life in Utah, said..." The Herald is quoting a study done by Mormons.Trolldor wrote:http://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/lifemat ... 19945.html
$20 bucks says they were Xtian, and lying.Holding out improves marriage
December 29, 2010 - 10:24AM
Comments 31
Not so fast . . . there are rewards for waiting to have sex until marriage, says an American study.
Not so fast . . . there are rewards for waiting to have sex until marriage, says an American study.
Couples who avoid sex before marriage end up having happier, more stable relationships, and a better time in bed, according to psychologists.
An American study backs the straightlaced view that sex should wait until your wedding night.
Researchers questioned more than 2000 married individuals about their relationships, and asked them when they started having sex.
That's the point, making it scarce raised its worth. I'd say, do it when you desire it, because by the time you've reached what is considered reliable and trustworthy twosomeness by US-standards, particularly the part where all discord is communicated away and there is agreement on all practicalities of life, desire may have totally fizzled out.Trolldor wrote:I'm curious... if they waited 'until marriage' to do the deed... they would not have had a sex life, so improving on that would be quite easy, no?
Deersbee wrote:If you are religious, apparently, the married years are not lean. "God's little rabbits: Religious people out-reproduce secular ones by a landslide"
http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/ ... R_20101228
You've got a point there! But still, they hardly go without sex.Xamonas Chegwé wrote:Deersbee wrote:If you are religious, apparently, the married years are not lean. "God's little rabbits: Religious people out-reproduce secular ones by a landslide"
http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/ ... R_20101228
So you are correlating "Number of Offspring" with "Amount of Sex"? I think you may be missing the "Enough Sense to Use Contraception" term from your equation.
Not without, no. But we can't be sure they do it more than once per kid.Deersbee wrote:You've got a point there! But still, they hardly go without sex.Xamonas Chegwé wrote:Deersbee wrote:If you are religious, apparently, the married years are not lean. "God's little rabbits: Religious people out-reproduce secular ones by a landslide"
http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/ ... R_20101228
So you are correlating "Number of Offspring" with "Amount of Sex"? I think you may be missing the "Enough Sense to Use Contraception" term from your equation.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests