Columbia Professor Charged With Incest

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Mai, I dated a gal in Indiana who was, with her four sisters, totally in love with their father. He was extremely handsome, very fun, and a great dad. I got the strong impression that any of them would have hopped in the sack with him at finger crook.

That's exactly what crossed my mind when I read the article. I've been reading this guy's stuff on HP for a while now, he's bright, smart and attractive. He's a Columbia professor so he doesn't lack for young, beautiful women to have affairs with.

So it could be that she went after him.

[Azathoth]

First, the evidence incest between consenting adults is a crime without referring to religious rules, please?

The religious rules came later when people had already worked out fucking your close relations was a bad idea

[Gawdzilla Sama]

First, the evidence incest between consenting adults is a crime without referring to religious rules, please?

Leave FBM's cousins out of this, please.

[maiforpeace]

First, the evidence incest between consenting adults is a crime without referring to religious rules, please?

Leave FBM's cousins out of this, please.

[mistermack]

I would lock em both up. That is, if they really had only only been at it for the three years, but I wouldn't believe that for one minute.
I think Woody Allen should have been locked up. If you accept a child as a step-child, it should be classed as incest, because you are betraying a responsibility you took on as a parent.
You can make a case for excusing the younger partner, as growing up is a confusing time, but the elder one has no excuse. All you have to do is say no.
.

First, the evidence incest between consenting adults is a crime without referring to religious rules, please?

Second, she was 21, she was "legal" since whatever age she would have to be in that state, so why the double-standard? The younger party is not automatically the innocent one in these cases.

It used to annoy me, explaining the bleed'n obvious to you, but now I quite enjoy it. I feel I must be helping with your education.
So, first point: He's been arrested. Doesn't that give a hint that it might be illegal?

Second point. Did you quote my post, without reading it? I said I would lock em both up, but the elder partner is more to blame, as they have the responsibility to protect and guide an offspring, and that lasts a lifetime.
.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

I would lock em both up. That is, if they really had only only been at it for the three years, but I wouldn't believe that for one minute.
I think Woody Allen should have been locked up. If you accept a child as a step-child, it should be classed as incest, because you are betraying a responsibility you took on as a parent.
You can make a case for excusing the younger partner, as growing up is a confusing time, but the elder one has no excuse. All you have to do is say no.
.

First, the evidence incest between consenting adults is a crime without referring to religious rules, please?

Second, she was 21, she was "legal" since whatever age she would have to be in that state, so why the double-standard? The younger party is not automatically the innocent one in these cases.

It used to annoy me, explaining the bleed'n obvious to you, but now I quite enjoy it. I feel I must be helping with your education.
So, first point: He's been arrested. Doesn't that give a hint that it might be illegal?

It used to annoying to see you being deliberately obtuse. Now I realize you just can't read.

Second point. Did you quote my post, without reading it? I said I would lock em both up, but the elder partner is more to blame, as they have the responsibility to protect and guide an offspring, and that lasts a lifetime.
.

You have proof that the older party is more guilty? Other than cultural bias, that is.

[Rob]

You keep saying lock them up yet fail to substantiate what they should be locked up for.

[FBM]

First, the evidence incest between consenting adults is a crime without referring to religious rules, please?

Leave FBM's cousins out of this, please.

Hey! I...I....I....might eventually think of a good response to that!

[Faithfree]

consensual

That should be the start, beginning and end of the matter.

Both are well over the arbitrary age of consent in the US, so however repulsive this relationship may be personally, what does it have to do with anyone else, or the state? If it's not consensual, that's another matter.

[mistermack]

You keep saying lock them up yet fail to substantiate what they should be locked up for.

Incest.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

You keep saying lock them up yet fail to substantiate what they should be locked up for.

Incest.

And without religious edicts, highly hypocritical edicts, why is it a crime between two people in the age of consent?

[maiforpeace]

You keep saying lock them up yet fail to substantiate what they should be locked up for.

Incest.

Lots of things are illegal, that we, at least based on the response from many here, would all agree should not be crimes.

Granted, we are all immoral atheists.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

You keep saying lock them up yet fail to substantiate what they should be locked up for.

Incest.

Lots of things are illegal, that we, at least based on the response from many here, would all agree should not be crimes.

Granted, we are all immortal atheists.

[maiforpeace]

You keep saying lock them up yet fail to substantiate what they should be locked up for.

Incest.

Lots of things are illegal, that we, at least based on the response from many here, would all agree should not be crimes.

Granted, we are all immortal atheists.

I just finished watching Tuck Everlasting five minutes ago - I think it's a good atheist themed movie, I recommend it.

[devogue]

I love the smell of incest.