Ban Ronald McDonald?

Post Reply

Should Ronald McDonald be banned?

Yes, ban him.
25
43%
No, don't ban him.
30
52%
Maybe/Not sure
3
5%
 
Total votes: 58

User avatar
sandinista
Posts: 2546
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:15 pm
About me: It’s a plot, but busta can you tell me who’s greedier?
Big corporations, the pigs or the media?
Contact:

Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?

Post by sandinista » Sat Nov 13, 2010 11:37 pm

AnInconvenientScotsman wrote:
maiforpeace wrote:Ronja, you mentioned some laws in Europe that regulate advertising targeted specifically to children. Do they apply to Happy Meals in this case? Do they have happy meals at the McDonald's in Europe? All I could find on Google about Happy Meals in Europe was something about a partnership with a conservation program.
Yeah, we have Happy Meals
:( that's too bad
Our struggle is not against actual corrupt individuals, but against those in power in general, against their authority, against the global order and the ideological mystification which sustains it.

User avatar
Warren Dew
Posts: 3781
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Contact:

Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?

Post by Warren Dew » Sun Nov 14, 2010 1:07 am

Tigger wrote:I think I'd agree. I was overweight a few years ago, but I knew whose fault it was, which is why I lost 20% of my body weight and kept it off. Someone blaming another factor like McDonalds, glands (ffs), etc, will perhpas be happy to waddle through life blaming something else. My sister is a doctor and she sees this attitude all the time.
"But I do exercise, Doc, and I'm not losing weight!"
"Yes, but because you exercise you're not gaining weight anymore. To lose weight you need to eat less [essentially] and do more."
I wouldn't go so far as to say anyone can lose the extra weight through "exercise more, eat less". That worked for me when I started gaining weight in my late 20s, but it did not work when I again started gaining weight in my mid 40s. Then I went on a specific type of low carb diet for other reasons, and the 15 pounds of extra weight came off.

I'd describe it differently: the people who are overweight don't know how to lose the weight - whether it's not knowing how to summon up the willpower, or not knowing what kind of diet will work for them - so they tend to blame things beyond their control. And of course their blame is likely to be wrong, since if it was right, they wouldn't be overweight.

The opposite possibility is that McDonald's actually is at fault, in which case we'd expect the thin people to be the ones who realized what the problem was and they'd want to ban McDonald's since they knew avoiding it worked.

User avatar
Mahou
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 11:03 pm
Location: Cleveland
Contact:

Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?

Post by Mahou » Sun Nov 14, 2010 2:42 am

sandinista wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:Fast "food" is worse for you than marijuana or, say, cocaine, and as bad for you as cigarettes or alcohol.
Can you provide some statistics to support that?


Also, "Governments ban other things" is not a good argument. You need to draw the line somewhere. Regulation on buying firearms, for example, is fine. However, if they started requiring registration to buy Airsoft guns and the justification was "we ban other guns" I'd have a bit of a problem. It's even more insignificant an argument for me because I support the legalization of all drugs should someone want to buy them. Again, education and counter-advertising are more reasonable solutions since I believe they'd be more effective and they don't limit our personal freedoms.
Hello members.
Look at your comment, now back to mine. Now back at your comment now back to mine. Sadly it isn't mine, but if you stopped trolling and started posting legitimate comments it could look like mine. Look down, back up, where are you? You're scrolling through comments, writing the comment your comment could look like. What did you post? Back at mine, it's a reply saying something you want to hear. Look again the reply is now diamonds.Anything is possible when you think before you post. I'm on a swivel chair.

User avatar
charlou
arseist
Posts: 32530
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am

Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?

Post by charlou » Sun Nov 14, 2010 3:13 am

Warren Dew wrote:I'd describe it differently: the people who are overweight don't know how to lose the weight - whether it's not knowing how to summon up the willpower, or not knowing what kind of diet will work for them - so they tend to blame things beyond their control. And of course their blame is likely to be wrong, since if it was right, they wouldn't be overweight.
There's also the possibility that many people who are considered overweight by society's standards are quite okay with their own body. Apart from society telling them their body is wrong, they're healthy and comfortable and enjoy life.
no fences

User avatar
Warren Dew
Posts: 3781
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Contact:

Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?

Post by Warren Dew » Sun Nov 14, 2010 5:20 am

Charlou wrote:There's also the possibility that many people who are considered overweight by society's standards are quite okay with their own body. Apart from society telling them their body is wrong, they're healthy and comfortable and enjoy life.
Also true. Presumably those people don't blame McDonald's or anyone else for it, since they're happy with their weight. They'd fit in with that other possibility that I mentioned, where it's the thin people calling for McDonald's to be banned.

User avatar
sandinista
Posts: 2546
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:15 pm
About me: It’s a plot, but busta can you tell me who’s greedier?
Big corporations, the pigs or the media?
Contact:

Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?

Post by sandinista » Sun Nov 14, 2010 6:58 am

Mahou wrote:
sandinista wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:Fast "food" is worse for you than marijuana or, say, cocaine, and as bad for you as cigarettes or alcohol.
Can you provide some statistics to support that?
Perhaps, if I could get the stats that support this "the RELATIVE unhealthiness of McDonald's food is WAY overblown.Coito ergo sum " which is what I was responding to.
Our struggle is not against actual corrupt individuals, but against those in power in general, against their authority, against the global order and the ideological mystification which sustains it.

User avatar
Warren Dew
Posts: 3781
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Contact:

Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?

Post by Warren Dew » Sun Nov 14, 2010 7:01 am

Tigger wrote:Along with the poll, it'd be interesting to record the BMIs of the contributors to this thread.
I've created a poll here:

http://www.rationalia.com/forum/viewtop ... 22&t=19633

User avatar
Clinton Huxley
19th century monkeybitch.
Posts: 23739
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?

Post by Clinton Huxley » Sun Nov 14, 2010 7:34 am

McDonalds and KFC and the like now to be given control of UK anti-obesity policy. You couldn't make it up.

User avatar
Tigger
1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 piccolos
Posts: 15714
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:26 pm
About me: It's not "about" me, it's exactly me.
Location: location location.

Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?

Post by Tigger » Sun Nov 14, 2010 9:55 am

Warren Dew wrote:
Tigger wrote:Along with the poll, it'd be interesting to record the BMIs of the contributors to this thread.
I've created a poll here:

http://www.rationalia.com/forum/viewtop ... 22&t=19633
Nice one!
Image
Seth wrote:Fuck that, I like opening Pandora's box and shoving my tool inside it

User avatar
Ronja
Just Another Safety Nut
Posts: 10920
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 8:13 pm
About me: mother of 2 girls, married to fellow rat MiM, student (SW, HCI, ICT...) , self-employed editor/proofreader/translator
Location: Helsinki, Finland, EU
Contact:

Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?

Post by Ronja » Sun Nov 14, 2010 12:34 pm

Clinton Huxley wrote:McDonalds and KFC and the like now to be given control of UK anti-obesity policy. You couldn't make it up.
I really had some hopes that you might only be jesting, sir, but I have just been informed by an acquaintance over yonder in the county of Facebook, that indeed things stand as you have thus informed us. http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010 ... lth-policy

My family and I are all naturally devastated by this news, though I suppose not half as much as you and your gentle lady, whose lives this evil plot touches so much more intimately than ours. Rest assured that you are in our thoughts constantly, and we will cheer you in any campaign that you choose to commence against this foul undertaking.

I remain cordially yours etc. etc.
"The internet is made of people. People matter. This includes you. Stop trying to sell everything about yourself to everyone. Don’t just hammer away and repeat and talk at people—talk TO people. It’s organic. Make stuff for the internet that matters to you, even if it seems stupid. Do it because it’s good and feels important. Put up more cat pictures. Make more songs. Show your doodles. Give things away and take things that are free." - Maureen J

"...anyone who says it’s “just the Internet” can :pawiz: . And then when they come back, they can :pawiz: again." - Tigger

User avatar
maiforpeace
Account Suspended at Member's Request
Posts: 15726
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:41 am
Location: under the redwood trees

Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?

Post by maiforpeace » Sun Nov 14, 2010 1:48 pm

Clinton Huxley wrote:McDonalds and KFC and the like now to be given control of UK anti-obesity policy. You couldn't make it up.
:shock:

That's crazy!
Atheists have always argued that this world is all that we have, and that our duty is to one another to make the very most and best of it. ~Christopher Hitchens~
Image
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3534/379 ... 3be9_o.jpg[/imgc]

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41041
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?

Post by Svartalf » Sun Nov 14, 2010 2:25 pm

No, it's capitalism at its finest, lobbying a corrupt and weak government to let it write legislation favorable for itself, and have them pass it for its greatest benefits.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?

Post by Coito ergo sum » Sun Nov 14, 2010 2:26 pm

Charlou wrote:
Warren Dew wrote:I'd describe it differently: the people who are overweight don't know how to lose the weight - whether it's not knowing how to summon up the willpower, or not knowing what kind of diet will work for them - so they tend to blame things beyond their control. And of course their blame is likely to be wrong, since if it was right, they wouldn't be overweight.
There's also the possibility that many people who are considered overweight by society's standards are quite okay with their own body. Apart from society telling them their body is wrong, they're healthy and comfortable and enjoy life.
Whether someone is "happy" with their weight is one thing. Whether the amount of fat on their body is unhealthy is another. There are many health issues that are causally connected to higher body fat percentages, and particularly obesity.

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?

Post by Coito ergo sum » Sun Nov 14, 2010 2:28 pm

Svartalf wrote:No, it's capitalism at its finest, lobbying a corrupt and weak government to let it write legislation favorable for itself, and have them pass it for its greatest benefits.
LOL - ...and the true motivation of the anti-McDonald's movement is illustrated...

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?

Post by Coito ergo sum » Sun Nov 14, 2010 2:36 pm

sandinista wrote:
AnInconvenientScotsman wrote:
maiforpeace wrote:Ronja, you mentioned some laws in Europe that regulate advertising targeted specifically to children. Do they apply to Happy Meals in this case? Do they have happy meals at the McDonald's in Europe? All I could find on Google about Happy Meals in Europe was something about a partnership with a conservation program.
Yeah, we have Happy Meals
:( that's too bad
I've seen restaurants give kids crayons and a placemat that can be used like a coloring book. Those DEMONS! How dare they configure their product to provide an enjoyable time for children....

Get me my picket sign. Denny's! IHOP! You and your pancakes with whipped cream!!!!! How dare you market to children! (Just saw a Denny's commercial on t.v. during a time when children are likely to be watching t.v.)..... ;ob;

Egg mcmuffin at McDonald's is healthier than a pancakes with syrup on it, by the way. So, any parents that feed their kids pancakes -- lock 'em up! ;ob;

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests