LOL @ RatSkep

A forum to talk about other sites and things you've found in the jungle that is the internet.

Please take a moment to read the rationalia guidelines: http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3449
Post Reply
User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: LOL @ RatSkep

Post by Robert_S » Sat Nov 13, 2010 10:35 am

Bella Fortuna wrote:
Robert_S wrote:
Bella Fortuna wrote: ...they don't have :dance: or :awesome: there...
That explains a lot.
And a bit of :MFM2: :FMF3: wouldn't go awry either.
Slowly! We don't want to shock the more delicate sensibilities. :dq:
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
Feck
.
.
Posts: 28391
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:25 pm
Contact:

Re: LOL @ RatSkep

Post by Feck » Sat Nov 13, 2010 10:51 am

Do we really have to listen to everyone every time that a mod pisses someone off at Rat skep ? should every one of their mod posts be dissected here

Would our mods like to think that every time they did or said something that it would be bitched about on another forum ?
I know that I would come into conflict with the ratskep way of doing things So guess fucking what I'm not a member !

If you don't like it there fine ! we are more than happy to host your sorry asses here ,we have a very different attitude and yes the odd post saying "I got banned from there ,and all I said was ...." might be ok but it seems every time someone comes here complaining it turns out that they only want to tell us half the story and a slandered mod from there eventually has to post here to explain the full history pages and pages and bitching about it all .Do I go whining all over Ratsckep every time Pappa tells me I'm being a twat and should STFU ? If you can't work out how to be rude nasty and dismissive of someone and still stay within a forums guide lines then guess fucking what you are not as bright or clever as you think you are .
:hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog:
Give me the wine , I don't need the bread

User avatar
Ilovelucy
Posts: 203
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:31 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Re: LOL @ RatSkep

Post by Ilovelucy » Sat Nov 13, 2010 11:02 am

Feck wrote:Do we really have to listen to everyone every time that a mod pisses someone off at Rat skep ? should every one of their mod posts be dissected here

Would our mods like to think that every time they did or said something that it would be bitched about on another forum ?
I know that I would come into conflict with the ratskep way of doing things So guess fucking what I'm not a member !

If you don't like it there fine ! we are more than happy to host your sorry asses here ,we have a very different attitude and yes the odd post saying "I got banned from there ,and all I said was ...." might be ok but it seems every time someone comes here complaining it turns out that they only want to tell us half the story and a slandered mod from there eventually has to post here to explain the full history pages and pages and bitching about it all .Do I go whining all over Ratsckep every time Pappa tells me I'm being a twat and should STFU ? If you can't work out how to be rude nasty and dismissive of someone and still stay within a forums guide lines then guess fucking what you are not as bright or clever as you think you are .
Hey, went through lots of the same when I was modding RDF, didn't bother me in the slightest, part of the territory.

As for the rudeness and nastiness within the rules, well, I think it makes someone a bit of a dick actually, not really clever in the slightest. It also shows how myopic adherence to the letter of the FUA blinds people to the spirit of it. A syntactically veiled PAI is just as disruptive as any other PAI, especially when it's as obvious as the one quoted above. Whether it's deemed a PAI or not, it's certainly unacceptable from a mod IMO.
Forums are interesting and if you don't agree, you can fuck off.

User avatar
Feck
.
.
Posts: 28391
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:25 pm
Contact:

Re: LOL @ RatSkep

Post by Feck » Sat Nov 13, 2010 11:05 am

That's why we have a Play nice rule here ,very difficult to bend that one .
:hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog:
Give me the wine , I don't need the bread

devogue

Re: LOL @ RatSkep

Post by devogue » Sat Nov 13, 2010 11:52 am

Bella Fortuna wrote:I always feel, though, if I post any kind of a quip or anything not wholly serious or narrowly on-topic elsewhere that there's dead silence afterward and get the sense I'm being stared down at a bit scornfully. It's just a mood I sense... keep things siloed. I find it terribly off-putting.
I don't get that at all.

I've posted plenty of flippant remarks around the "serious" forums there and they've pretty much all been followed up with a :mrgreen: and a slight derail, or been ignored (which doesn't bother me in the slightest because that can also happen in social forums). Here's an example:

http://www.rationalskepticism.org/astro ... ml#p570870

I also started a thread titled "Calm the fuck down" in the Tech forum and then proceeded to muck about and have a laugh about drama - eventually the thread descended (ascended?) in to singing "I'm a little teapot". I didn't receive any sanction at all, the thread was quietly and correctly moved to Social and Fun and everyone got on with it. I feel very comfortable there because I feel happy among old friends, just as I do here, and I feel that many people there are happy to see me about as well. Yes, there are certain rigid restrictions (most notably the sex discussions) but it doesn't spoil my enjoyment, in the same way that when the smoking ban came in I could still enjoy a night in the pub even though I had to stand outside whenever I wanted a cigarette. I think for the most part it's a good, well run, stimulating forum.

User avatar
Feck
.
.
Posts: 28391
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:25 pm
Contact:

Re: LOL @ RatSkep

Post by Feck » Sat Nov 13, 2010 11:59 am

devogue wrote:
Bella Fortuna wrote:I always feel, though, if I post any kind of a quip or anything not wholly serious or narrowly on-topic elsewhere that there's dead silence afterward and get the sense I'm being stared down at a bit scornfully. It's just a mood I sense... keep things siloed. I find it terribly off-putting.
I don't get that at all.

I've posted plenty of flippant remarks around the "serious" forums there and they've pretty much all been followed up with a :mrgreen: and a slight derail, or been ignored (which doesn't bother me in the slightest because that can also happen in social forums). Here's an example:

http://www.rationalskepticism.org/astro ... ml#p570870

I also started a thread titled "Calm the fuck down" in the Tech forum and then proceeded to muck about and have a laugh about drama - eventually the thread descended (ascended?) in to singing "I'm a little teapot". I didn't receive any sanction at all, the thread was quietly and correctly moved to Social and Fun and everyone got on with it. I feel very comfortable there because I feel happy among old friends, just as I do here, and I feel that many people there are happy to see me about as well. Yes, there are certain rigid restrictions (most notably the sex discussions) but it doesn't spoil my enjoyment, in the same way that when the smoking ban came in I could still enjoy a night in the pub even though I had to stand outside whenever I wanted a cigarette. I think for the most part it's a good, well run, stimulating forum.
Well do they put up with you then ? huh
:hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog:
Give me the wine , I don't need the bread

User avatar
Thinking Aloud
Page Bottomer
Posts: 20111
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:56 am
Contact:

Re: LOL @ RatSkep

Post by Thinking Aloud » Sat Nov 13, 2010 12:49 pm

I go to RatSkep for the same reason I went to RDF - to occasionally read and sometimes contribute to the more serious discussions. Though I also sometimes feel that same "tumbleweed" sensation if I do post. I suspect it's more a case that I'm an infrequent visitor, not well known there, and with a low post count - consciously or unconsciously that results in being excluded by residents from conversations. RDF never drew me in to the degree that I was a regular poster - I was never part of the social side of that place, and likewise RatSkep doesn't fulfill that role either.

I suspect the tumbleweed would blow away if I spent as much time there as I do here, and probably the same for others.

In terms of discussing their "dramas" - I think it does everyone good to discuss what's perceived to be causing problems elsewhere. That helps "us" to avoid the same things happening here.

User avatar
Ronja
Just Another Safety Nut
Posts: 10920
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 8:13 pm
About me: mother of 2 girls, married to fellow rat MiM, student (SW, HCI, ICT...) , self-employed editor/proofreader/translator
Location: Helsinki, Finland, EU
Contact:

Re: LOL @ RatSkep

Post by Ronja » Sat Nov 13, 2010 4:21 pm

Thinking Aloud wrote:...
In terms of discussing their "dramas" - I think it does everyone good to discuss what's perceived to be causing problems elsewhere. That helps "us" to avoid the same things happening here.
Spot on. :tup:
"The internet is made of people. People matter. This includes you. Stop trying to sell everything about yourself to everyone. Don’t just hammer away and repeat and talk at people—talk TO people. It’s organic. Make stuff for the internet that matters to you, even if it seems stupid. Do it because it’s good and feels important. Put up more cat pictures. Make more songs. Show your doodles. Give things away and take things that are free." - Maureen J

"...anyone who says it’s “just the Internet” can :pawiz: . And then when they come back, they can :pawiz: again." - Tigger

User avatar
ED209
Posts: 93
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:39 pm
Contact:

Re: LOL @ RatSkep

Post by ED209 » Sun Nov 14, 2010 3:26 pm

Hello, you all probably don't know me :biggrin:

I registered here after the RDF meltdown but drifted over to RatSkep primarily because the blue theme and selection of subforums made it a close substitute for RDF. I lurk a lot but don't have a massive post count over there, I've never received so much as an advisory and I don't have any axe to grind against anyone.

So from what I consider neutral perspective I will agree that the moderation team over there has lost the fucking plot altogether. Application of the increasingly silly FUA has passed being entirely partial and is now completely unhinged. I may not have deactivated/lost it at anyone over there but I am not very excited about the changes in tone. In fact, I think that they are total fucking bullshit, and I wish I had stuck on here instead.

:tea:

User avatar
Bella Fortuna
Sister Golden Hair
Posts: 79685
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require.
Location: Scotlifornia
Contact:

Re: LOL @ RatSkep

Post by Bella Fortuna » Sun Nov 14, 2010 3:28 pm

I know you - nice to see you again. :td:

Settle in and stay a spell. :flowers:
Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Image
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/

User avatar
cowiz
Shirley
Posts: 16482
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 11:56 pm
About me: Head up a camels arse
Location: Colorado
Contact:

Re: LOL @ RatSkep

Post by cowiz » Sun Nov 14, 2010 3:28 pm

ED209 wrote:Hello, you all probably don't know me :biggrin:

I registered here after the RDF meltdown but drifted over to RatSkep primarily because the blue theme and selection of subforums made it a close substitute for RDF. I lurk a lot but don't have a massive post count over there, I've never received so much as an advisory and I don't have any axe to grind against anyone.

So from what I consider neutral perspective I will agree that the moderation team over there has lost the fucking plot altogether. Application of the increasingly silly FUA has passed being entirely partial and is now completely unhinged. I may not have deactivated/lost it at anyone over there but I am not very excited about the changes in tone. In fact, I think that they are total fucking bullshit, and I wish I had stuck on here instead.

:tea:
Welcome back Ed.

Once a Ratz, always a Ratz....
It's a piece of piss to be cowiz, but it's not cowiz to be a piece of piss. Or something like that.

User avatar
Bella Fortuna
Sister Golden Hair
Posts: 79685
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require.
Location: Scotlifornia
Contact:

Re: LOL @ RatSkep

Post by Bella Fortuna » Sun Nov 14, 2010 3:30 pm

ED209 wrote: drifted over to RatSkep primarily because the blue theme
:lol: :tup: Nice.
Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Image
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/

User avatar
maiforpeace
Account Suspended at Member's Request
Posts: 15726
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:41 am
Location: under the redwood trees

Re: LOL @ RatSkep

Post by maiforpeace » Sun Nov 14, 2010 3:31 pm

ED209 wrote:Hello, you all probably don't know me :biggrin:

I registered here after the RDF meltdown but drifted over to RatSkep primarily because the blue theme and selection of subforums made it a close substitute for RDF. I lurk a lot but don't have a massive post count over there, I've never received so much as an advisory and I don't have any axe to grind against anyone.

So from what I consider neutral perspective I will agree that the moderation team over there has lost the fucking plot altogether. Application of the increasingly silly FUA has passed being entirely partial and is now completely unhinged. I may not have deactivated/lost it at anyone over there but I am not very excited about the changes in tone. In fact, I think that they are total fucking bullshit, and I wish I had stuck on here instead.

:tea:
Well you're here now! Glad you're back. Tan and brown suit you rather well anyway.

:cheers: :flowers:
Atheists have always argued that this world is all that we have, and that our duty is to one another to make the very most and best of it. ~Christopher Hitchens~
Image
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3534/379 ... 3be9_o.jpg[/imgc]

User avatar
Thinking Aloud
Page Bottomer
Posts: 20111
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:56 am
Contact:

Re: LOL @ RatSkep

Post by Thinking Aloud » Sun Nov 14, 2010 3:32 pm

ED209 wrote:drifted over to RatSkep primarily because the blue theme
You can get rid of the brown in the User Control Panel if you want - I think one of the bluey/silver ones is available as an alternative.

:cheers:

User avatar
Rob
Carpe Diem
Posts: 2558
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 1:49 am
About me: Just a man in love with science and the pursuit of knowledge.
Location: Seattle, WA
Contact:

Re: LOL @ RatSkep

Post by Rob » Sun Nov 14, 2010 3:32 pm

:whisper:

I use blue and silver.
I can live with doubt, and uncertainty, and not knowing. I think it's much more interesting to live not knowing than to have answers which might be wrong. [...] I don’t feel frightened by not knowing things, by being lost in a mysterious universe without having any purpose, which is the way it really is, as far as I can tell, possibly. It doesn’t frighten me. - Richard Feynman

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests