sandinista wrote:JimC wrote:sandinista wrote:and you think some shit on a doorstep is going to change the governments plans? Don't think so. Blockades, do you think that would change anything? The peaceful sit down picnic "protest" would also accomplish nothing. It was done at the G20 in Toronto and accomplished nothing but getting protesters arrested. When I asked "such as..." I was looking for actions that would actually have some effect on government decisions and neo liberal policies. Sure anyone can come up with "clever" protest ideas, but as I was saying previous, they will accomplish nothing. Even if, as you are saying the students simply refused to pay the increase, all that would mean is their schooling would be done.
Find me somewhere in the Western world in the post WW2 years where violent, destructive action achieved real change in government policy that peaceful protest was totally ineffective in altering...
(not counting liberation struggles in 3rd world countries to throw out colonial remnants...)
Find me somewhere post 2001 where "peaceful protest" has effected meaningful change on government/neo liberal policies. I must admit I am speaking mostly from a north american standpoint as I have never been to europe or australia, perhaps those kinds of actions work there still, they don't here.
Ducked that question nicely, I see...
However, I am coming from a perspective that you would probably repudiate, that it is the will of the people, as expressed in some form of parlamentary democracy, that should ultimately prevail. Non-violent protest movements, union action, boycotts, media stunts and many other things are part of the mix which can affect and mobilise public opinion, and either lead to a change in policy (if the government of the day sees which way the wind blows), or a change of government at the next election.
And yes, I know that media bias can hamper this, that party systems in government can get too cosy, and that corporations are canny enough to use whatever influence they can...
As against that, Australia has a strong and proud tradition of union involvement in politics, and a diverse media with an independent ABC.
The key for me is that the anarchist-inspired violence at international meetings over the past 10 years have caused nothing but widespread revulsion in the vast majority of the populace in the west, completely tarnishing and devaluing the sometimes valid arguments about international economic trends they may wish to put in the public domain. Small, violent bands of protesters are the ultimate elitists - the whole, deceptive "vanguard of the people" crap that the extreme left (which I am not suggesting you belong to) has used to justify its deeply anti-democratic position since the days of the bolsheviks...