Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

A forum to talk about other sites and things you've found in the jungle that is the internet.

Please take a moment to read the rationalia guidelines: http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3449
Locked
User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by Robert_S » Sun Nov 07, 2010 2:00 pm

eXcommunicate wrote:Josh liked Chinchillas before it was cool to like Chinchillas.
He's trying to look sensitive, that means the poor things gonna be a chinchilla chimichanga before the weeks out is we don't do something!!! :panic:
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
Bella Fortuna
Sister Golden Hair
Posts: 79685
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require.
Location: Scotlifornia
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by Bella Fortuna » Sun Nov 07, 2010 2:12 pm

Robert_S wrote:
eXcommunicate wrote:Josh liked Chinchillas before it was cool to like Chinchillas.
He's trying to look sensitive, that means the poor things gonna be a chinchilla chimichanga before the weeks out is we don't do something!!! :panic:
Nah - he'll just say that he invented it and claim all the profits deriving from chinchillas rightly belong to him.
Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Image
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/

hopey_dishwasher
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 9:52 pm
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by hopey_dishwasher » Sun Nov 07, 2010 8:00 pm

I've sort of been following this, but am not legally-literate enough to understand what the point of the new documents is. What's being removed?

Does this mean the case has been dropped, or moved to another court, or what? Are they documents that he has received, or that he has submitted?

Also, what's his defense? Is it

a) that he never took the money
b) he was entitled to the money and he took it, and hasn't done anything wrong
c) the precise manner in which he was employed did not legally prevent him from taking the money, so he did; You snooze you lose.

?

User avatar
hadespussercats
I've come for your pants.
Posts: 18586
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:27 am
About me: Looks pretty good, coming out of the back of his neck like that.
Location: Gotham
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by hadespussercats » Sun Nov 07, 2010 9:25 pm

hopey_dishwasher wrote:I've sort of been following this, but am not legally-literate enough to understand what the point of the new documents is. What's being removed?

Does this mean the case has been dropped, or moved to another court, or what? Are they documents that he has received, or that he has submitted?

Also, what's his defense? Is it

a) that he never took the money
b) he was entitled to the money and he took it, and hasn't done anything wrong
c) the precise manner in which he was employed did not legally prevent him from taking the money, so he did; You snooze you lose.

?
I just looked up "notice of removal"-- the gist I get is that a defendant can apply to have his case removed from state to federal jurisdiction, or from one state to another (as long as all defendants in a case agree to do so.) The reasons for this could be that the defendant doubts their ability to get a fair trial under the initial jurisdiction, or that possibly the statutes of the new jurisdiction would be more favorable to the defendant's case. Or possibly so that two people who just moved to Oregon don't have to travel to California for their court dates. I'm not sure.

What I don't understand is why JT is publishing all this. What's the point? These forms do nothing to establish the facts of the case. Nor do they engender sympathy-- any more than a photo of a douchy-looking guy nuzzling a chinchilla engenders sympathy. But all I can think is that he's trying to fight his court case one-handed in the public sphere, before it actually takes place in the legal one. Which, quite frankly, reeks of the man who doth protest too much. And it makes him seem very immature and loose-lipped-- which, what with the chinchilla photos and all, he probably is.
The green careening planet
spins blindly in the dark
so close to annihilation.

Listen. No one listens. Meow.

User avatar
Bella Fortuna
Sister Golden Hair
Posts: 79685
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require.
Location: Scotlifornia
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by Bella Fortuna » Sun Nov 07, 2010 9:29 pm

I think the chinchilla photo may be the most damning thing about the whole matter. :hehe:

"If the chinchilla fits, you must acquit"
Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Image
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/

User avatar
Tigger
1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 piccolos
Posts: 15714
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:26 pm
About me: It's not "about" me, it's exactly me.
Location: location location.

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by Tigger » Sun Nov 07, 2010 9:34 pm

It's not actually a chinchilla
Image
Image
Seth wrote:Fuck that, I like opening Pandora's box and shoving my tool inside it

User avatar
Bella Fortuna
Sister Golden Hair
Posts: 79685
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require.
Location: Scotlifornia
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by Bella Fortuna » Sun Nov 07, 2010 9:39 pm

Tigger wrote:It's not actually a chinchilla
Image
^^^ Cross breeding between Timonen and a chinchilla...
Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Image
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/

User avatar
hadespussercats
I've come for your pants.
Posts: 18586
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:27 am
About me: Looks pretty good, coming out of the back of his neck like that.
Location: Gotham
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by hadespussercats » Sun Nov 07, 2010 10:01 pm

Bella Fortuna wrote:I think the chinchilla photo may be the most damning thing about the whole matter. :hehe:

"If the chinchilla fits, you must acquit"
I'm suddenly seeing images in my head of Richard Gere... huh. Funny.
The green careening planet
spins blindly in the dark
so close to annihilation.

Listen. No one listens. Meow.

User avatar
Bella Fortuna
Sister Golden Hair
Posts: 79685
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require.
Location: Scotlifornia
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by Bella Fortuna » Sun Nov 07, 2010 10:02 pm

hadespussercats wrote:
Bella Fortuna wrote:I think the chinchilla photo may be the most damning thing about the whole matter. :hehe:

"If the chinchilla fits, you must acquit"
I'm suddenly seeing images in my head of Richard Gere... huh. Funny.
Maybe JT's just a bigger arsehole...
Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Image
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/

User avatar
lordpasternack
Divine Knob Twiddler
Posts: 6459
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:05 am
About me: I have remarkable elbows.
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by lordpasternack » Sun Nov 07, 2010 10:02 pm

As I already said, Mai - Josh cares more about trying to have his ego stroked, massaged and consoled than he does about being in the right.

This was perfectly evident when he (perhaps with assistance from sidekick Andrew) flung poo at us unwashed masses during the very exciting renovation of RD.net, and Josh then assisted Richard in publishing his "Outrage" post, which Josh KNEW contained blatant falsehoods and misrepresentations - and which he must have known would cause even more ill-feeling. And he must have known that it would be frankly embarrassing for Richard to publish and then have to retract that, and perhaps only after the sorry mess had made some of the popular press.

That is of no consequence. EGO, EGO, EGO.

Might I add though that perhaps one of his biggest mistakes in all this has been greatly underestimating and insulting our intelligence. Does he really, really, think we are going to be moved by vague protestations of innocence with no real substance, alongside sweet, soppy pictures? :coffee:
Then they for sudden joy did weep,
And I for sorrow sung,
That such a king should play bo-peep,
And go the fools among.
Prithee, nuncle, keep a schoolmaster that can teach
thy fool to lie: I would fain learn to lie.

User avatar
Rum
Absent Minded Processor
Posts: 37285
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by Rum » Sun Nov 07, 2010 10:25 pm

I find it quite worrying that people are influenced by opinion, impressions (the chinchilla was certainly a mistake!), and prejudice here. I don't like the look of this guy either from what I know, but I am happy for the courts to decide what was legal and what was not.

User avatar
lordpasternack
Divine Knob Twiddler
Posts: 6459
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:05 am
About me: I have remarkable elbows.
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by lordpasternack » Sun Nov 07, 2010 10:38 pm

Rum wrote:I find it quite worrying that people are influenced by opinion, impressions (the chinchilla was certainly a mistake!), and prejudice here. I don't like the look of this guy either from what I know, but I am happy for the courts to decide what was legal and what was not.
As I've already stated, it's not just a question of legalities here. Someone can be a downright cunt, and still be within the letter of the law. Timonen could have led Dawkins down a long garden path, wilfully deceived and misled him, and used money that was ostensibly agreed to be used for charity coffers instead for his own selfish purposes - and he could get away with this partially or fully so far as the law is concerned - and we can all still agree that it's completely bastardly, all the same.
Then they for sudden joy did weep,
And I for sorrow sung,
That such a king should play bo-peep,
And go the fools among.
Prithee, nuncle, keep a schoolmaster that can teach
thy fool to lie: I would fain learn to lie.

User avatar
Pappa
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Posts: 56488
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by Pappa » Sun Nov 07, 2010 10:51 pm

Hahahaha.... the documents have been removed. What a surprise. Josh is an utter dufus for posting anything online about it while proceeding are... erm... proceeding.

User avatar
klr
(%gibber(who=klr, what=Leprageek);)
Posts: 32964
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 1:25 pm
About me: The money was just resting in my account.
Location: Airstrip Two
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by klr » Sun Nov 07, 2010 10:56 pm

Pappa wrote:Hahahaha.... the documents have been removed. What a surprise. Josh is an utter dufus for posting anything online about it while proceeding are... erm... proceeding.
Indeed, especially as the Google cache sees all ... something RD himself once pointed out. :read:
God has no place within these walls, just like facts have no place within organized religion. - Superintendent Chalmers

It's not up to us to choose which laws we want to obey. If it were, I'd kill everyone who looked at me cock-eyed! - Rex Banner

The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression. - Gary Larson

:mob: :comp: :mob:

User avatar
lordpasternack
Divine Knob Twiddler
Posts: 6459
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:05 am
About me: I have remarkable elbows.
Contact:

Re: Dawkins sues Josh Timonen

Post by lordpasternack » Sun Nov 07, 2010 11:21 pm

Pappa wrote:Josh is an utter dufus
Pappa's post: abridged version. Practically lossless compression. :tea:
Then they for sudden joy did weep,
And I for sorrow sung,
That such a king should play bo-peep,
And go the fools among.
Prithee, nuncle, keep a schoolmaster that can teach
thy fool to lie: I would fain learn to lie.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests