-
Chinaski
- Mazel tov cocktail
- Posts: 3043
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:33 am
- About me: Barfly
- Location: Aberdeen
-
Contact:
Post
by Chinaski » Mon Apr 20, 2009 5:43 pm
Xamonas Chegwé wrote:The US didn't even go in the first place. See the BBC quote in the earlier post by klr.
Woops

-
Xamonas Chegwé
- Bouncer

- Posts: 50939
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:23 pm
- About me: I have prehensile eyebrows.
I speak 9 languages fluently, one of which other people can also speak.
When backed into a corner, I fit perfectly - having a right-angled arse.
- Location: Nottingham UK
-
Contact:
Post
by Xamonas Chegwé » Tue Apr 21, 2009 10:56 pm
The full text of Ahmedinnerjacket's speech can be read here - if you have the stomach for it. I managed about half of it before the constant repetition and polemic got too much to bear.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle ... 010747.stm
A book is a version of the world. If you do not like it, ignore it; or offer your own version in return.
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing 
Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur
-
Existentialist1844
- Clique Infiltrator
- Posts: 6373
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:45 pm
- About me: Trying to avoid existential despair.
-
Contact:
Post
by Existentialist1844 » Tue Apr 21, 2009 11:16 pm
I couldnt make it past the first paragraph.

"Anyone can give up, it's the easiest thing in the world to do. But to hold it together when everyone else would understand if you fell apart, that's true strength."

-
Tigger
- 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 piccolos
- Posts: 15714
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:26 pm
- About me: It's not "about" me, it's exactly me.
- Location: location location.
Post
by Tigger » Wed Apr 22, 2009 12:00 am
I read this:
In the name of God, the Merciful, the Compassionate. Thanks to God, the Lord of the worlds, and peace and praise be upon our master and prophet, Muhammad...
before stopping.
The useless, fucking, deluded, cunting, ingnorant, misogynous, un-fucking-believable, un-forgiveable, be-bearded, fuckwitted, motherfucking cuntyflap.
I detest him and others of his ilk with every fibre of my being.
Words fail me.
I think.
Seth wrote:Fuck that, I like opening Pandora's box and shoving my tool inside it
-
Woodbutcher
- Stray Cat

- Posts: 8306
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:54 pm
- About me: Still crazy after all these years.
- Location: Northern Muskeg, The Great White North
-
Contact:
Post
by Woodbutcher » Wed Apr 22, 2009 12:05 am
I read it all. He makes some good points, but negates all of them by referring to a new religion-based world order that should be in charge. We all know this means islam. His referring to the"Zionist Plot" time after time reminds me of the Roman senator who always used to start his speeches:" Caeterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam"."I believe Carthage should be destroyed".
If women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy.-Red Green
"Yo". Rocky
"Never been worried about what other people see when they look at me". Gawdzilla
"No friends currently defined." Friends & Foes.
-
Arse
- Posts: 1609
- Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 12:28 pm
-
Contact:
Post
by Arse » Wed Apr 22, 2009 12:16 am
Woodbutcher wrote:I read it all. He makes some good points, but negates all of them by referring to a new religion-based world order that should be in charge. We all know this means islam. His referring to the"Zionist Plot" time after time reminds me of the Roman senator who always used to start his speeches:" Caeterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam"."I believe Carthage should be destroyed".
Is that what he reminds you of? Funny, he reminds me of someone slightly more German, or more accurately, Austrian.
-
al-rawandi
- Posts: 150
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 10:25 pm
-
Contact:
Post
by al-rawandi » Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:58 pm
Woodbutcher wrote:I read it all. He makes some good points, but negates all of them by referring to a new religion-based world order that should be in charge. We all know this means islam. His referring to the"Zionist Plot" time after time reminds me of the Roman senator who always used to start his speeches:" Caeterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam"."I believe Carthage should be destroyed".
It was Cato the Elder, and he began all of his speeches in the Senate with "Carthago delenda est".
Last edited by
al-rawandi on Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
al-rawandi
- Posts: 150
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 10:25 pm
-
Contact:
Post
by al-rawandi » Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:59 pm
Woodbutcher wrote:I read it all. He makes some good points, but negates all of them by referring to a new religion-based world order that should be in charge. We all know this means islam. His referring to the"Zionist Plot" time after time reminds me of the Roman senator who always used to start his speeches:" Caeterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam"."I believe Carthage should be destroyed".
What exactly did you agree with in that speech? Mercifully he removed the Holocaust denial bullshit he usually throws in. So let's have it, what did you like about it?
-
Xamonas Chegwé
- Bouncer

- Posts: 50939
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:23 pm
- About me: I have prehensile eyebrows.
I speak 9 languages fluently, one of which other people can also speak.
When backed into a corner, I fit perfectly - having a right-angled arse.
- Location: Nottingham UK
-
Contact:
Post
by Xamonas Chegwé » Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:38 pm
al-rawandi wrote:Woodbutcher wrote:I read it all. He makes some good points, but negates all of them by referring to a new religion-based world order that should be in charge. We all know this means islam. His referring to the"Zionist Plot" time after time reminds me of the Roman senator who always used to start his speeches:" Caeterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam"."I believe Carthage should be destroyed".
What exactly did you agree with in that speech?
Mercifully he removed the Holocaust denial bullshit he usually throws in. So let's have it, what did you like about it?
Yes. He went from denying it to blaming holocaust guilt for the creation of Israel and the whole ME conflict. Quite a U-turn! But hardly progress. Wanker

A book is a version of the world. If you do not like it, ignore it; or offer your own version in return.
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing 
Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur
-
al-rawandi
- Posts: 150
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 10:25 pm
-
Contact:
Post
by al-rawandi » Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:57 pm
Xamonas Chegwé wrote:al-rawandi wrote:Woodbutcher wrote:I read it all. He makes some good points, but negates all of them by referring to a new religion-based world order that should be in charge. We all know this means islam. His referring to the"Zionist Plot" time after time reminds me of the Roman senator who always used to start his speeches:" Caeterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam"."I believe Carthage should be destroyed".
What exactly did you agree with in that speech?
Mercifully he removed the Holocaust denial bullshit he usually throws in. So let's have it, what did you like about it?
Yes. He went from denying it to blaming holocaust guilt for the creation of Israel and the whole ME conflict. Quite a U-turn! But hardly progress. Wanker

It is the standard Muslim pathology...
Muslim: "There was no Holocaust"
Some guy: "Yes there was"
Muslim: "Exactly, and the Jews deserved it"
They both deny the Holocaust and say that the Jews deserve it. So Ahmedinejad originally had outright denial in the speech then he adjusted that to say that it is a tool for the Jews. He needs to pick a story. The anti-Semitism is bad when you use completely conflicting opinions on the Holocaust simply to abuse Jews.
-
Trolldor
- Gargling with Nails
- Posts: 15878
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 5:57 am
-
Contact:
Post
by Trolldor » Fri Apr 24, 2009 1:28 am
FrigidSymphony wrote:Europe and the other "Westerners" (US) walked out. I'm guessing the rest of the Middle East was cheering.
I don't think many stayed at all.
The UN is a cesspool of symbolistic clap trap. Nothing can be done unless you accept the UN's authority, what the fuck is the point of it?
"The fact is that far more crime and child abuse has been committed by zealots in the name of God, Jesus and Mohammed than has ever been committed in the name of Satan. Many people don't like that statement but few can argue with it."
-
Woodbutcher
- Stray Cat

- Posts: 8306
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:54 pm
- About me: Still crazy after all these years.
- Location: Northern Muskeg, The Great White North
-
Contact:
Post
by Woodbutcher » Fri Apr 24, 2009 11:58 am
al-rawandi wrote:Woodbutcher wrote:I read it all. He makes some good points, but negates all of them by referring to a new religion-based world order that should be in charge. We all know this means islam. His referring to the"Zionist Plot" time after time reminds me of the Roman senator who always used to start his speeches:" Caeterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam"."I believe Carthage should be destroyed".
What exactly did you agree with in that speech? Mercifully he removed the Holocaust denial bullshit he usually throws in. So let's have it, what did you like about it?
Some of the minor points, but none of his rhetoric. You know, must work towards common good, help the poor, be charitable. The man is a total fuckwit because he has a Messiah complex. I've rarely seen anyone so in love with himself and his self-importance. My comment was actually more cynical than anything, because I am quite sure that if he was in charge the West (and all the other compass points) would be fucked. He'd be worse than Hitler.
If women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy.-Red Green
"Yo". Rocky
"Never been worried about what other people see when they look at me". Gawdzilla
"No friends currently defined." Friends & Foes.
-
Arse
- Posts: 1609
- Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 12:28 pm
-
Contact:
Post
by Arse » Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:36 pm
You know, must work towards common good, help the poor, be charitable.
He should start working on the appalling human rights record in his own fucking country instead of lecturing the west. And I'm shocked at all the wombats who stayed in the room and applauded this hypocrite. Good for the Norwegian delegate who called him out and the ones who walked.
-
al-rawandi
- Posts: 150
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 10:25 pm
-
Contact:
Post
by al-rawandi » Sat Apr 25, 2009 3:00 am
ghost wrote:You know, must work towards common good, help the poor, be charitable.
He should start working on the appalling human rights record in his own fucking country instead of lecturing the west. And I'm shocked at all the wombats who stayed in the room and applauded this hypocrite. Good for the Norwegian delegate who called him out and the ones who walked.
Absolutely. His calls for good works are meaningless so long as he supports terrorism and continues to execute homosexuals.
Fuck him.
-
charlou
- arseist
- Posts: 32530
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am
Post
by charlou » Sat Apr 25, 2009 3:02 am
al-rawandi wrote:ghost wrote:You know, must work towards common good, help the poor, be charitable.
He should start working on the appalling human rights record in his own fucking country instead of lecturing the west. And I'm shocked at all the wombats who stayed in the room and applauded this hypocrite. Good for the Norwegian delegate who called him out and the ones who walked.
Absolutely. His calls for good works are meaningless so long as he supports terrorism and continues to execute homosexuals.
Fuck him.
Well, Woodbutcher did say:
He makes some good points, but negates all of them by referring to a new religion-based world order that should be in charge. We all know this means islam.
(my bold)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests