The "Sanity" Rally. Is Jon Stewart naive?

Post Reply
User avatar
Ian
Mr Incredible
Posts: 16975
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:42 pm
Location: Washington DC

Re: The "Sanity" Rally. Is Jon Stewart naive?

Post by Ian » Tue Nov 02, 2010 10:26 pm

Yes, I still say it was not a political rally!

Why must everything be political, of have some ulterior motive? The entire point of the rally was to address the state of angry, partisan discourse in the country. Period. Feel free to read whatever deeper motives you like, but that was what it was all about.

User avatar
sandinista
Posts: 2546
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:15 pm
About me: It’s a plot, but busta can you tell me who’s greedier?
Big corporations, the pigs or the media?
Contact:

Re: The "Sanity" Rally. Is Jon Stewart naive?

Post by sandinista » Tue Nov 02, 2010 10:39 pm

Ian wrote:Yes, I still say it was not a political rally!

Why must everything be political, of have some ulterior motive? The entire point of the rally was to address the state of angry, partisan discourse in the country. Period. Feel free to read whatever deeper motives you like, but that was what it was all about.
why must everything be political? because it is. simple. Everything is, whether you like it or not, or wish it wasn't or whatever, everything is political.
Our struggle is not against actual corrupt individuals, but against those in power in general, against their authority, against the global order and the ideological mystification which sustains it.

User avatar
Ian
Mr Incredible
Posts: 16975
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:42 pm
Location: Washington DC

Re: The "Sanity" Rally. Is Jon Stewart naive?

Post by Ian » Tue Nov 02, 2010 11:04 pm

FYI, in case this thread was missed - my report and pictures from the rally:

http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.p ... 25#p645857

User avatar
eXcommunicate
Mr Handsome Sr.
Posts: 821
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 6:49 pm
Location: Indiana, USA
Contact:

Re: The "Sanity" Rally. Is Jon Stewart naive?

Post by eXcommunicate » Wed Nov 03, 2010 12:09 am

Is that Richard Gere?

Image
Michael Hafer
You know, when I read that I wanted to muff-punch you with my typewriter.
One girl; two cocks. Ultimate showdown.

User avatar
Ian
Mr Incredible
Posts: 16975
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:42 pm
Location: Washington DC

Re: The "Sanity" Rally. Is Jon Stewart naive?

Post by Ian » Wed Nov 03, 2010 12:13 am

Believe it or not, I think that was a woman!

User avatar
Warren Dew
Posts: 3781
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Contact:

Re: The "Sanity" Rally. Is Jon Stewart naive?

Post by Warren Dew » Wed Nov 03, 2010 3:28 am

Coito ergo sum wrote:The "middle" are folks that voted for Obama and were surprised that he pushed Obamacare, unions, and the other issues he championed. I mean - these are folks that were inundated for 18 months of Obama's campaign wherein he promised to do all the things he's done and tried to do, and then are now surprised that he did them? People are fucking idiots.
They're not surprised that he did them. They're surprised that those policies largely prevented and still prevent recovery from the recession. You can consider them "fucking idiots" for not understanding basic macroeconomics, but the fact is, few people do - even many very intelligent and otherwise well educated people have serious misconceptions about how the economy works.

Trolldor
Gargling with Nails
Posts: 15878
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 5:57 am
Contact:

Re: The "Sanity" Rally. Is Jon Stewart naive?

Post by Trolldor » Wed Nov 03, 2010 4:32 am

A small correction from an outside perspective:
The entire thing was, to the rest of the world, a rally for moderate, civil discourse in politics.

I'll let the faithful of the left and right battle their little scriptural differences now.
"The fact is that far more crime and child abuse has been committed by zealots in the name of God, Jesus and Mohammed than has ever been committed in the name of Satan. Many people don't like that statement but few can argue with it."

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: The "Sanity" Rally. Is Jon Stewart naive?

Post by Hermit » Wed Nov 03, 2010 5:42 am

eXcommunicate wrote:Sitting around together and politely discussing politics and policy, coming to an agreement on what's best, then deciding upon an implementation is what I'd prefer to do. Unfortunately, the current political and human realities just don't allow for that. What does extending an olive branch to the other side gain when the other side simply throws it back in your face?
I am glad that the apathy of middle-of-the-road liberals* can be sufficiently overcome for a quarter of a million of them to attend a rally. It's a welcome sign that the right is not going to entirely get its way over the next few years.

Apart from that, if the closing speech encapsulates what Stewart is trying to convey, the motivation is fundamentally ill conceived. It was an appeal for tolerance of diversity, and how that enhances quality of life. Very democratic indeed, but just how and why are we supposed to tolerate what we perceive to be the intolerable beliefs and behaviour that result from such beliefs? Stewart never explains that. He simply says that we should. His lane-merging metaphor is profoundly unhelpful. It was all so banal, naive and lacking in practical suggestions that the whole shebang reminded me of Culture Club's pap song Melting Pot. The speech is crying out for a parody akin to the way Culture Club's song was ridiculed in another one named Pop-Up Toaster.


*Comments to the effect they are in fact "left wingers" are noted, but then that's the US for you. In most of Europe and in Australia Steward, Colbert and the audience they appeal to would be regarded as nowhere near the left of the political spectrum.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

User avatar
sandinista
Posts: 2546
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:15 pm
About me: It’s a plot, but busta can you tell me who’s greedier?
Big corporations, the pigs or the media?
Contact:

Re: The "Sanity" Rally. Is Jon Stewart naive?

Post by sandinista » Wed Nov 03, 2010 7:24 am

The Mad Hatter wrote:A small correction from an outside perspective:
The entire thing was, to the rest of the world, a rally for moderate, civil discourse in politics.

I'll let the faithful of the left and right battle their little scriptural differences now.
Not just a genius...the mad hatter speaks for the entire world. He IS the outside perspective. :indub:
Our struggle is not against actual corrupt individuals, but against those in power in general, against their authority, against the global order and the ideological mystification which sustains it.

User avatar
JOZeldenrust
Posts: 557
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 11:49 am
Contact:

Re: The "Sanity" Rally. Is Jon Stewart naive?

Post by JOZeldenrust » Wed Nov 03, 2010 11:00 am

sandinista wrote:
Ian wrote:Yes, I still say it was not a political rally!

Why must everything be political, of have some ulterior motive? The entire point of the rally was to address the state of angry, partisan discourse in the country. Period. Feel free to read whatever deeper motives you like, but that was what it was all about.
why must everything be political? because it is. simple. Everything is, whether you like it or not, or wish it wasn't or whatever, everything is political.
If everything is political, then "political" is a meaningless term.

The central message of this rally wasn't political, it was an objection to tendentious retoric. Tendentious retoric is more prevalent among conservatives, but progressives aren't free of blame entirely. This was explicitely adressed during the rally and its build-up.

I think it was a shame there was quite a bit of tea party hate. It wasn't quite as outrageous as some of the things some tea partiers get up to, but still possibly counterproductive. Other then that, I think the rally did a good job of increasing the visibility of moderates.

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: The "Sanity" Rally. Is Jon Stewart naive?

Post by Coito ergo sum » Wed Nov 03, 2010 11:05 am

Ian wrote:Yes, I still say it was not a political rally!

Why must everything be political, of have some ulterior motive? The entire point of the rally was to address the state of angry, partisan discourse in the country. Period. Feel free to read whatever deeper motives you like, but that was what it was all about.
I have to say, I agree with sandinista on this one. Clearly, it was a political rally.

Not everything must be political, but the rally was political. If the entire point of the rally was to address the state of angry, partisan discourse in the country, then it did so with massively partisan discourse, some of which was itself angry.

I mean - the names alone - "Rally to Restore Sanity," is an accusation that the other guy is "insane." The "Keep Fear Alive" - is along the constant refrain from the left or liberals that those they oppose are always in "fear" of something. Hate - Fear - Stupidity - common characteristics of non-liberals, so they say.

Image

Image

Image

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: The "Sanity" Rally. Is Jon Stewart naive?

Post by Coito ergo sum » Wed Nov 03, 2010 11:08 am

JOZeldenrust wrote:
The central message of this rally wasn't political, it was an objection to tendentious retoric.
...through the use of tendentious rhetoric.
JOZeldenrust wrote: Tendentious retoric is more prevalent among conservatives, but progressives aren't free of blame entirely.
I don't see that. I see tendentious rhetoric as common throughout the political spectrum. And, not only are progressives not free of it, they revel in it. That's why those they oppose are "idiots," and "hateful" and "racist" and [insert comparison to Hitler] and insane, etc.

User avatar
JOZeldenrust
Posts: 557
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 11:49 am
Contact:

Re: The "Sanity" Rally. Is Jon Stewart naive?

Post by JOZeldenrust » Wed Nov 03, 2010 11:10 am

Warren Dew wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:The "middle" are folks that voted for Obama and were surprised that he pushed Obamacare, unions, and the other issues he championed. I mean - these are folks that were inundated for 18 months of Obama's campaign wherein he promised to do all the things he's done and tried to do, and then are now surprised that he did them? People are fucking idiots.
They're not surprised that he did them. They're surprised that those policies largely prevented and still prevent recovery from the recession. You can consider them "fucking idiots" for not understanding basic macroeconomics, but the fact is, few people do - even many very intelligent and otherwise well educated people have serious misconceptions about how the economy works.
Including you, by the look of it. Obama's economic policies have been pretty solid, even if a bit half-hearted.

In a recession, government should stimulate spending. The way to do this is not to indiscriminately lower taxes, because lack of trust among the public will just lead afluent people to hoard money. Getting money into the hands of people who have very little, and are pretty much forced to spend it, has a much larger effect on spending, and has the additional benefit of increasing social mobility. So, in a recession, increase government spending and redistribute the wealth.

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: The "Sanity" Rally. Is Jon Stewart naive?

Post by Coito ergo sum » Wed Nov 03, 2010 11:15 am

Warren Dew wrote: They're not surprised that he did them. They're surprised that those policies largely prevented and still prevent recovery from the recession.
Well, I'm moreso referring to folks who voted for the guy and were surprised that he, oh, pushed through "health care reform." I mean - he said he was going to do that, and the independents cheered and cheered. A year later they're pissed because he pushed through health care reform? I don't get it. Did the independents think he was promising "free" health care at improved service levels with shorter lines and zero denials of coverage for any procedure? What hell did people expect when he promised to "guarantee health insurance for all people?" Suddenly, it seems, they're like...."hey.....wait a cotton pickin' minute here.....you mean we're going to have to PAY for the insurance????"

So, in 12 to 18 months, a group of folks who were four square behind the Democratic agenda turned around 180 degrees and are now repudiating what they were told would be the agenda....

User avatar
JOZeldenrust
Posts: 557
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 11:49 am
Contact:

Re: The "Sanity" Rally. Is Jon Stewart naive?

Post by JOZeldenrust » Wed Nov 03, 2010 11:23 am

Coito ergo sum wrote:
JOZeldenrust wrote:
The central message of this rally wasn't political, it was an objection to tendentious retoric.
...through the use of tendentious rhetoric.
Through the use of humor, much of it self-depricating, and yes, a bit of tendentious rhetoric (spelling of Greek derivates in English is hard, thanks). It's a rally, and tendentious rhetoric is the idiom of rallies.
JOZeldenrust wrote: Tendentious retoric is more prevalent among conservatives, but progressives aren't free of blame entirely.
I don't see that. I see tendentious rhetoric as common throughout the political spectrum. And, not only are progressives not free of it, they revel in it. That's why those they oppose are "idiots," and "hateful" and "racist" and [insert comparison to Hitler] and insane, etc.
I don't see much harm in calling someone who you think hold radically irrational beliefs an idiot. Calling them racist when they're not, or accusing them of being hateful, or gratuitously comparing anyone to Hitler is a bit much.

I can't really tell if progressives (and by "progressive" I mean anything left of center) rival conservatives (anything right of center) in their use of vitriol. The conservative vitriol is certainly a lot more visible.

Keith Olberman is clearly a hateful, elitist, progressive nazi though.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: L'Emmerdeur and 26 guests