Tarot Mafia: Days 1 - 7 archive

[Gallstones]

Lynching me means one of two things but accomplishes the same goal.
You are scum and are trying to eliminate a known town.
You are town and can't tell who is and who isn't and are guessing based on the flimsiest of reasons.

[Morticia]

Lynching me means one of two things but accomplishes the same goal.
You are scum and are trying to eliminate a known town.
You are town and can't tell who is and who isn't and are guessing based on the flimsiest of reasons.

This is what I am trying to avoid. Also to answer your question before about why I left a part of your quote out was my point was not to deny that it was right but to point out that you could also be employing scum tactics by insisting on ur innocence and having been cleared. Also about Zigmen, there are many reasons he could have said you were cleared. Mainly that he could have been wrong which others have pointed out. Also he would have no way to know if you were scum or not at that point. I'm just pointing out that the mess with Zigmen could mean nothing. Also that said I have been trying to decifer how these roles are assigned. From what I can see reading thru the wiki a double vote is a town option. You did have the double vote last night so that may speak in your favor. Unless it is a role that can go either way. Which I don't have the answer to but some of the veteran plays may know.

[Morticia]

Also after reading through the roles further it seems that the only role that is both town and scum is the roleblocker. That could mean that UT was scum and blocked two instead of killing to cloud the issue.

[Gallstones]

I think uslesstwit is almost certainly scum.

[Morticia]

PS I have RL stuff to do for a few hours (it's friday night here now) I will be back.

[Morticia]

but first Unvote Gallstones

[Gallstones]

I have RL stuff to do too. I'll be gone a few hours.

[Uselesstwit]

Or maybe Charlou and UT are the remaining scum.

'Cause it doesn't seem to be Gall & Mort.


Useless, how were you able to block 2 people at one time?

read the op for day five

http://www.rationalia.com/forum/viewtop ... 81#p594486

The pm said I could use a night action on two people. If I were scum I would have killed two people not blocked them. I had the choice of blocking or protecting that night. I went with the block since it was more likely to show us scum. I figured if there was no kill we'd have a 50/50 split for lynch targets( I obviously didn't know about gallstones block as well). Protecting two people would have just given us a 50/50 choice between two possible innocents and there would be no way to confirm my story.

[Mantisdreamz]

Useless, who are you going to vote for?

[Uselesstwit]

Useless, who are you going to vote for?

I'm not sure. I can see a case for damn near everyone.

You?

[Gallstones]

Vote Charlou.

[Mantisdreamz]

vote Charlou

I think you've set a little something up, Uselesstwit. I feel a little wary about your whole story.

[charlou]

I'm just in and read the day's debate.

Gallstones, you're flailing wildly.

Morticia ... it turned out it wasn't Denny so it must be you.

vote Morticia

[Mantisdreamz]

vote Charlou

I think you've set a little something up, Uselesstwit. I feel a little wary about your whole story.

I meant to unvote

then vote Charlou

Char, I think UT made that scheme about blocking Denny & Mort to try and frame them, in a way. I think it's the 2 of you.

[charlou]

I don't know about UT, but you think wrong about me, Mantis.

Of the three blocked players, one is now cleared by his lynch. I know I'm clear so that leaves Morticia. She's the only one I can be certain about.