Tea Party Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5

[higgs2]

Good lord. No, there is almost no chance that there is a town role blocker. Couldn't believe the gallstones comment and charlou digging into it. Charlou, why did you do that? Do you have any explanation why you'd try to out a seer if you're town? UT, you said you're not "feeling" that any more. Any other reason you're not suspecting Charlou?

Totals you're right in thinking that a seer would not normally want to out, especially if there's not a serious bw on a town person. Then I can see it.

I have to be honest, I can't remember; was anyone blocked last night? If no scum whore, then I think it's more likely there's a don.

I wasn't feeling it anymore because I thought char's claim that Gallstones statement was so definitive as to be a self outing made sense. But you're right, that still doesn't explain why Charlou asked that question in that way.

Mind you that's very similar to how galls screwed everyone over at the RatSkep game

Tell me more.

I meant, I want to hear more about gallstones in the other game. I don't play ratskep games.
This.

[charlou]

He has an extra .5 vote and stuck it on FP without explanation

Actually, he did make comments about FP earlier in the thread. It was just his vote post that didn't contain an explanation, so scratch that bit.

[higgs2]

screwed up quotes, this is what I meant to say:

"I meant, I want to hear more about gallstones in the other game. I don't play ratskep games."

[mononoke]

Good lord. No, there is almost no chance that there is a town role blocker. Couldn't believe the gallstones comment and charlou digging into it. Charlou, why did you do that? Do you have any explanation why you'd try to out a seer if you're town? UT, you said you're not "feeling" that any more. Any other reason you're not suspecting Charlou?

Totals you're right in thinking that a seer would not normally want to out, especially if there's not a serious bw on a town person. Then I can see it.

I have to be honest, I can't remember; was anyone blocked last night? If no scum whore, then I think it's more likely there's a don.

I wasn't feeling it anymore because I thought char's claim that Gallstones statement was so definitive as to be a self outing made sense. But you're right, that still doesn't explain why Charlou asked that question in that way.

Mind you that's very similar to how galls screwed everyone over at the RatSkep game

Tell me more.

She was one of sum the leaders, so she was immune to viewing. And once she was viewed she simply to a very very pro town position, even at risk of getting assassinated by one of the competing bad guys. I''m not suspecting galls or anything, but she shouldn't be cleared as town yet

[higgs2]

Good lord. No, there is almost no chance that there is a town role blocker. Couldn't believe the gallstones comment and charlou digging into it. Charlou, why did you do that? Do you have any explanation why you'd try to out a seer if you're town? UT, you said you're not "feeling" that any more. Any other reason you're not suspecting Charlou?

Totals you're right in thinking that a seer would not normally want to out, especially if there's not a serious bw on a town person. Then I can see it.

I have to be honest, I can't remember; was anyone blocked last night? If no scum whore, then I think it's more likely there's a don.

Last game scum had a role blocker and no one mentioned getting blocked so I don't think we can go by that.

Well, if anyone was blocked, please speak up.

Sometimes people know they are whored and sometimes they don't know about a block. To know you are blocked and not speak up is p. scummy.

[higgs2]

Oh, UT, last game had a scum role blocker and a don? I didn't pay attn after I was out. What specials did town have?

[Uselesstwit]

While we have some activity here could a few of you go back and reread fecks posts? Keep in mind some questions I asked myself.

Why did he try so hard to be mayor and have his actions backed his reasons?

He has an extra .5 vote and stuck it on FP without explanation and seemed a bit blase about whether or not it's the right place to put his vote.

mononoke, was just going to comment on your absence ... good to see you postng ... and yes, please do tell us more about Gallstones' gameplay tactics.

re Feck's post ... I haven't discounted the possibility that he's the don. When Feck is scum he plays a more crafty game ... he wouldn't usually 1. be so obvious, and 2. let his comments reveal his scumminess. I think he's playing a clumsy town game.

I think you put your finger on just what is bothering me. He had all this energy to get elected and get viewed. Now that it's happened, he doesn't seem interested in the game. Let's not forget his team's main tactic last game was to hide on the sidelines.

[higgs2]

Good lord. No, there is almost no chance that there is a town role blocker. Couldn't believe the gallstones comment and charlou digging into it. Charlou, why did you do that? Do you have any explanation why you'd try to out a seer if you're town? UT, you said you're not "feeling" that any more. Any other reason you're not suspecting Charlou?

Totals you're right in thinking that a seer would not normally want to out, especially if there's not a serious bw on a town person. Then I can see it.

I have to be honest, I can't remember; was anyone blocked last night? If no scum whore, then I think it's more likely there's a don.

I wasn't feeling it anymore because I thought char's claim that Gallstones statement was so definitive as to be a self outing made sense. But you're right, that still doesn't explain why Charlou asked that question in that way.

Mind you that's very similar to how galls screwed everyone over at the RatSkep game

Tell me more.

She was one of sum the leaders, so she was immune to viewing. And once she was viewed she simply to a very very pro town position, even at risk of getting assassinated by one of the competing bad guys. I''m not suspecting galls or anything, but she shouldn't be cleared as town yet

Thanks. Actually, that doesn't really seem relevant now.

[charlou]

Specials last game were seer and vig.

I''m not suspecting galls or anything, but she shouldn't be cleared as town yet

Even if she is town, her gameplay has put town at greater risk. Unnecessarily so.

[Morticia]

We had both a don and a role blocker last game.

[higgs2]

So, we actually kind of need gallstones to claim. No counterclaim would tend to clear her.

For now I think we need to focus elsewhere. Here is my dilemma. Feck seems v. suspicious, there have been numerous posts pointing that out. Would he really put himself up for mayor as don and ask to be viewed after the hoohah last game? (Believe me I won't ever overlook that behavior again either.)

I'm going tovote feck I haven't heard a good explanation from him for his behavior, so I'm thinking he figured we wouldn't believe that someone would actually do that again.

[Uselesstwit]

Oh, UT, last game had a scum role blocker and a don? I didn't pay attn after I was out. What specials did town have?

I had to go check, Town only had a seer and vig. Scum had a don and prozzie.

[higgs2]

looks like this game prolly seer, doc and don? Did people not know they were blocked last game?

[mononoke]

Feck is playing a very strange game. why does he want us to think he's playing a suspicious game?

[charlou]

While we have some activity here could a few of you go back and reread fecks posts? Keep in mind some questions I asked myself.

Why did he try so hard to be mayor and have his actions backed his reasons?

He has an extra .5 vote and stuck it on FP without explanation and seemed a bit blase about whether or not it's the right place to put his vote.

mononoke, was just going to comment on your absence ... good to see you postng ... and yes, please do tell us more about Gallstones' gameplay tactics.

re Feck's post ... I haven't discounted the possibility that he's the don. When Feck is scum he plays a more crafty game ... he wouldn't usually 1. be so obvious, and 2. let his comments reveal his scumminess. I think he's playing a clumsy town game.

I think you put your finger on just what is bothering me. He had all this energy to get elected and get viewed. Now that it's happened, he doesn't seem interested in the game. Let's not forget his team's main tactic last game was to hide on the sidelines.

Yeah, I don't know ... it just seems a bit too brazenly risky ... that hasn't been Feck's style when he's been scum in the past ... not discounting it though. I want to hear what he has to say about it before agreeing we should be making anything more of it.