I worked in several slaughterhouses. I can comment on specifics from each. What does 'professionals' mean?Lozzer wrote:I didn't omit your question.Cunt wrote:Speaking of 'novice', I noticed you missed my questions. Thanks for that.Lozzer wrote:This is disingenuous, we aren't discussing how a 'humane' enthusiasm should be performed. And we certainly are not disputing the girl's 'novice' approach.Cunt wrote:So how would all of you choose to kill puppies?
I know I wouldn't toss them in a river, but what humane method would you all choose?
I saw another video on 4chan of a dog being beaten to death with a shovel. Many anon's raged about it, but when you consider that the blows were as fast as they were, the wielder was trying to make his kill quickly. If he fucked around for awhile, I would suggest abuse, but doing it fast and certainly is just putting an animal down.
So if you would never kill an animal yourself, think hard before you hate someone for doing the job you admit you couldn't do.Good of you to make that decision based on a few seconds of video. Even better of you to share it.Lozzer wrote: She was killing the puppies, it was an act of cruelty.Have you ever worked at a slaughterhouse, Lozzer? Occasionally, workers go 'weeee' as they 'do it'. Trust me.Lozzer wrote: You can clearly hear going 'weeee' as she did it. It was for entertainment, not a contestable necessity for well-being of the animals.
Is your hate equal to the young lady who kills a few one afternoon to a pork processing facility which can 'process' (love them euphemisms!) 6700 pigs in a 7.5h shift.
When you have had to kill an animal, how did you do it? Is hiring a hitman (veterenarian) to do it 'painlessly' more ethical than this method?When you say 'we' do you mean you and some other folks who personally kill, or are you just taking some of the credit for others who do this (necessary) dirty work?Lozzer wrote: Unlike third-world barbarians such as herself, here in Britain we put animals to sleep through veterinary application.So you know that she purchased a mother animal?Lozzer wrote: We do this because we have a responsibility to our pets welfare. If she had to discard these animals for whatever reason, she should have never purchased the mother animal in the first place. If you have to do this, you're in no position for accepting the responsibility entailed through pet ownership.
Or are you making some assumptions because you already don't like her anyway? Maybe just a little?
-=+OoO+=-A bit harsh, but true enough.Warren Dew wrote:Posting personal information here on this forum seems questionable to me, even if the rule only applies to forum members. It reminds me too much of people who post abortion doctors' personal information on "pro life" web sites.
To the poster who put it up - please take it down.
-=+OoO+=-
Should she have recorded more than the 40 seconds that she did, maybe I'd have more to go by. It's fair to extrapolate that from the briefness of the clip, she had no intention of journaling anything other than the cruelty.
Now who's making assumptions? Slaughter house workers are professionals, they aren't committed to the job for recreational purposes.
You seemed to assume the mother was the girl's responsibility.Lozzer wrote:
Pigs aren't domestic animals.
So it's a step too far to presume that these puppies had a mother? Maybe you think it's more reasonable to believe they just miraculously manifested out of thin air? Or maybe they were stolen?
It could have been her Dad who said 'go toss these in the river'. Maybe it's his responsibility you are pinning on her.
The girl may be responsible for killing a bit callously, but there is no reason to think a young teenaged girl ought to be responsible for spaying the family pet. (in one imagined scenario)
Pigs are smarter than dogs (and tastier!) and are as 'domestic' as anything else.
She did a bucket of puppies once. Those Olymel fuckers do a few thousand a day.